XP2000+ =1.67GHz, XP2100+ =what? etc.

[Squisher]

So at what MHz pionts will the AMD equivilances occur?

XP2100=?
XP2200=?
XP2300=?
etc.

 

[xarar]

every 66mhz its up 1 level because each new proc has .5 multiplier more so 133 * .5 = 66

1.67+.066 = 1733 then 1800 then 1866

 

[Squisher]

Thanks

 

[meaty]

we need a new standard to start calling cpu's by.
with amd 1.6 beating 2.0 intel in most benches, im all confused

 

[GeForceG]

The AMD 2100+ and so on it going to be with the AMD T-Bred 333Mhz FBS .13micron.
Just a rumor that I heard. Although makes a lot of sence.

 

[n18mets]

The inquirer's article gives some info about the T-bred. Do not listen to their statement about the higher cache. A more recent article, which they released cleared that up...can't find it though. I think they said that the later T-bred models will have more on-die cache, while the first bach has already been finalized.

 

[meaty]

anyone know when these 333 t-breds will be available?

 

[MadRat]

You can show a 1.0GHz XP beating a 2.0GHz P4 in benchmarks with the right benchmark. Likewise a 1.3GHz P4 can beat a 2000+ XP in the right benchmarks. Its not easy to compare when they don't use fair or optimized benchmarks.

btw - They ought to just release them as XP####A+'s, to denote the alternate core. This way they can call the larger cache T-bred something completely different. I'd like to see the XP####A+'s at a 166fsb, but its not going to happen.