- Nov 30, 2004
- 60,298
- 10,719
- 126
Here's a cut/paste of an email I sent to someone else. I thought it might be of interest to some of you. This wasn't scientific in any way, and my procedures could probably be improved. It's a good quick and dirty comparison though.
I booted into XP today to take care of some maintenance =-O and thought I'd re-download 3dMark for comparison to Vista(I couldn't transfer my previously downloaded copy due to folder permissions) so here's the results:
XP | Vista
3DMark Score - 5125 | 5263
SM 2.0 Score - 1967 | 2019
SM 3.0 Score - 1941 | 2011
CPU Score - 2838 | 2818
Return To Proxycon - 16.082fps | 16.353fps
Firefly Forest - 16.708fps | 17.298fps
CPU1 Red Valley - 0.907fps | 0.886fps
CPU2 Red Valley - 1.421fps | 1.434fps
Canyon Flight(SM 3.0) - 17.035fps | 17.302fps
Deep Freeze(SM 3.0) - 21.792fps | 22.927fps
Conclusion? Vista is the winner by a small margin . Tbh it really isn't that big a difference between them. I would call them equal in performance.
I booted into XP today to take care of some maintenance =-O and thought I'd re-download 3dMark for comparison to Vista(I couldn't transfer my previously downloaded copy due to folder permissions) so here's the results:
XP | Vista
3DMark Score - 5125 | 5263
SM 2.0 Score - 1967 | 2019
SM 3.0 Score - 1941 | 2011
CPU Score - 2838 | 2818
Return To Proxycon - 16.082fps | 16.353fps
Firefly Forest - 16.708fps | 17.298fps
CPU1 Red Valley - 0.907fps | 0.886fps
CPU2 Red Valley - 1.421fps | 1.434fps
Canyon Flight(SM 3.0) - 17.035fps | 17.302fps
Deep Freeze(SM 3.0) - 21.792fps | 22.927fps
Conclusion? Vista is the winner by a small margin . Tbh it really isn't that big a difference between them. I would call them equal in performance.
