XP, 754 and 939 CPU benchmark comparisons

[deeppow]

Have been accumulating testing results for my rigs over the last few years and put together a comparison just for the fun of it. Plus I was curious.

For those that are curious about such a comparison too, here is a link to a html page.

 

[BlingBlingArsch]

i like it

 

[formulav8]

nice job!

 

[deeppow]

Thanks folks!

 

[Avalon]

Neat to show how the XP platform is getting dated, but needs more tests

 

[phaxmohdem]

Nice comparo, I get bored occassinoally and do similar testing on my rigs... (I've got a buttload of em in my home office) The thing is I can't really do 3d tests because most of them are rackmounted, and I just use IGP, or crappy PCI vid cards to save on power and heat, as all the machines do is render stuff for me. Here is an interesting links to some apache web benchmarks that I ran, comaring my Single A-X 2600+ web-server to my Dual PPro 200, and Dual OC'd Celeron rigs. Kind of interesting results.

 

[robertk2012]

Wish you had a dual core 165 in that comparison

 

[deeppow]

Thanks for taking the time to provide feedback folks.

Originally posted by: Avalon... needs more tests

You mean more statistics or different tests. The second isn't going to happen, at least by me, the systems have been parted out.

Originally posted by: phaxmohdem... I can't really do 3d tests because most of them are rackmounted, and I just use IGP, or crappy PCI vid cards to save on power and heat, as all the machines do is render stuff for me.

Common for server-like machines of course. Just concentrate on calculational testing when it is useful. Thanks for linking to your data, yes it is interesting. I've not looked at this particular aspect before.

Originally posted by: robertk2012Wish you had a dual core 165 in that comparison

Me too!!! That would mean I had one.