• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

XP 2600+ is it 266 or 333??

well you might check the chip itself assuming you don't have the retail box. and the 2600+ even if it is a 133fsb it should be able to do 166. If it can't then it is definatly a 133 but it should be able to do the 166.
 
Originally posted by: edmundoab
check the bios default CPU settings

that is not reliable! i have built about a dozen athlon systems in the last month only half of which registered properly in the bios by default.
 
Originally posted by: DerwenArtos12
Originally posted by: edmundoab
check the bios default CPU settings

that is not reliable! i have built about a dozen athlon systems in the last month only half of which registered properly in the bios by default.

That has more to do with the motherboard... I've owned 7 different AMD CPU's in the past 3 years... and I've built many other AMD based systems for friends, familiy, etc. and never had a problem with the CPU being recognized. The only time I would ever expect trouble is when you're using a motherboard that doesn't officially support a processor... like putting a 333 Mhz bus processor in a KT266 chipset motherboard.
 
Back
Top