Xigmatek HDT-S1283 or ZEROtherm Nirvana NV120

[lopri]

Here are the links if you are not familiar with their names.

Xigmatek HDT-S1283

ZEROtherm Nirvana NV120

I'm thinking of building a Phenom system, and despite my preference toward top-down coolers, I have to worry that a typical top-down cooler might not cut it for an overclocked Phenom. Certainly Ultra-120 was a consideration, but after having quite a few (mostly bad ones) I'd like to try a different one.

I noticed the above two are very positively reviewed around the net, so I figured I'd ask if anyone has a first-hand experience. Just by glance:

- Advantage Xigmatek: Direct heatpipe touch might - more of my curiosity.
- Advantage ZEROtherm: The build looks more solid.
- Advantage Xigmatek: In case I change my mind, it will fit in Intel rig without taking the mobo out. Also it looks like I can use a fan of my choice.
- Advantage ZEROtherm: Got an extra heatpipe (4 vs Xigmatek's 3), and it looks way cool.

To be frank, none of the above really matters. I just want to know which one performs better. 😀

 

[BlueAcolyte]

I think the Xigamatek works better than the Nirvana.

 

[lopri]

Originally posted by: BlueAcolyte
I think the Xigamatek works better than the Nirvana.

From your experience, or.. ?

 

[ther00kie16]

According to frostytech, Nirvana on high speed is equal to Xigmatek on low with Xigmatek on high being about 2 degrees better. There are people out there who will dispute frostytech's data, especially with the TRU and TRUE (because of fan used). However I think their data for heatsinks that come with fans (Xigmatek and Nirvana) are trustworthy.

 

[Tullphan]

I've not tried the Nirvana, but I do know my Xigmatek is withing 3-4c of my lapped Tuniq Tower, if that helps any.

 

[lopri]

Thank you. All replies are helpful. I was concerned about S1283's somewhat skinny look (and only 3 heatpipes), but I guess that's a baseless worry.