GoldenBear

Banned
Mar 2, 2000
6,843
2
0
XFL

The article does take some issues to some extremes like the big consipiracy theory which I think was out of hand..but otherwise there's some good points.
 

loogie

Banned
Oct 18, 1999
2,478
0
0
wow...It's great to read an unbiased opinion...from MSNBC, no less! I'm eagerly anticipating their review of Windows XP and the XBox, since MSNBC is a great source for unbiased news.
 

GoldenBear

Banned
Mar 2, 2000
6,843
2
0
NBC is trying to get RID of the XFL. They've already broken from their two year deal with them, so your point is nullified.
 

pidge

Banned
Oct 10, 1999
1,519
0
0
I wish they didn't give the players microphones. It makes them look silly when you hear their trash talking so much. Just play the damn game and let your skills do the talking for you. Also, I can't stand their uniforms or the team names. It reminds me to much of high school football. I enjoy college football even more than the XFL. And I was originally rooting for the XFL since I think NFL ticket prices are ridiculous.
 

GoldenBear

Banned
Mar 2, 2000
6,843
2
0
<< Trying to get rid of and being rid of are two entirely different things. >>

How about breaking from a two year deal, and after this season (which is within a few weeks) NBC and the XFL will have ZERO assocication?
 

loogie

Banned
Oct 18, 1999
2,478
0
0


<< How about breaking from a two year deal, and after this season (which is within a few weeks) NBC and the XFL will have ZERO assocication? >>



The article was published on March 27th. NBC officially bailed out on April 4th. The article is still biased. Now, don't try to dodge the question like you normally do. Explain how this article is unbiased.
 

GoldenBear

Banned
Mar 2, 2000
6,843
2
0
<< The article was published on March 27th. NBC officially bailed out on April 4th >>

Scroll down the third paragraph, this news report was on 3/26.

http://www.wrestlingobserver.com/news/headlines/default.asp?aID=2104

<< Now, don't try to dodge the question like you normally do. >>

Huh?

<< Explain how this article is unbiased. >>

Huh?? Did I say it was unbiased? All I said was that there were good points..and I even stated that some points were taken to the extreme. You make it sound like you have something personal with me..