I've read the article on the former CPU with interest and the conclusion says that for 20 bucks more to definitely get the 880K. Now the RX 460 is a PCIe x8 card so no bottleneck. That leaves the question of the smaller cache of the 845. 6% performance loss in gaming attributable to it? You might say that the 845 costs 15% less and has a 32% lower TDP. I'm planning to overclock the 880K to 4.2GHz without raising voltage kind of like a free speed boost. You can't do that with the 845. Please don't tell me to buy Intel or wait for Zen. This is not my main rig and is supposed to be for gaming on the cheap without taking upgradability into consideration. The only thing that might be upgraded down the line will be the graphics card in two years or so. Which CPU will give me more value in this case? I'm guessing the 880K because the chance of it being a bottleneck down the line is lower?