Originally posted by: allies
If a 8800GTX was overclocked to 1GHz, I'm sure we'd see similar results![]()
Today, 01:06 AM
Brent_Justice (H) Video Card Managing Editor
All I'm gonna say is, 3dmark scores mean jack in relation to real gaming performance that I am experiencing.
Originally posted by: Gstanfor
Well, if you want to purchase a video card soley for 3dmark06, be my guest, but its not what I play on my system...
Originally posted by: Gstanfor
Well, if you want to purchase a video card soley for 3dmark06, be my guest, but its not what I play on my system...
Originally posted by: LOUISSSSS
Originally posted by: allies
If a 8800GTX was overclocked to 1GHz, I'm sure we'd see similar results![]()
but its not, therefore the x2900xt wins if the image isn't fake
Originally posted by: swtethan
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=1005117
first of all, look at the FPS it gets vs this 16k flat run, fake screenshot
Originally posted by: allies
Originally posted by: swtethan
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=1005117
first of all, look at the FPS it gets vs this 16k flat run, fake screenshot
Definitely NOT a fake screenshot, as the 2900XT was run with a C2Q, boosting the CPU and overall 3dmark score up significantly.
Originally posted by: swtethan
Originally posted by: allies
Originally posted by: swtethan
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=1005117
first of all, look at the FPS it gets vs this 16k flat run, fake screenshot
Definitely NOT a fake screenshot, as the 2900XT was run with a C2Q, boosting the CPU and overall 3dmark score up significantly.
so that means: xt oced to 1ghz, still slower than gtx