Originally posted by: thekillerjks
I was just looking around and I heard good reviews of the X2. I was wondering if the 3800+ X2 blow the 3700+ venice out of the water? Also is it worth the money?
Originally posted by: raildogg
Originally posted by: thekillerjks
I was just looking around and I heard good reviews of the X2. I was wondering if the 3800+ X2 blow the 3700+ venice out of the water? Also is it worth the money?
the 3700 is a san diego, not a venice. its L2 cache is twice that of the Venices.
the 3700 san diego can be easily overclocked to 2.4 or more speeds and thus be essentially a FX-55 or FX-57. i think for games, it is better if only slightly. i would buy it since it has amazing overclocking potential
you can get to 3ghz or higher on this processor if right cooling is used. its also about $100 cheaper than the X2 3800
Originally posted by: thekillerjks
I was just looking around and I heard good reviews of the X2. I was wondering if the 3800+ X2 blow the 3700+ venice out of the water? Also is it worth the money?
Originally posted by: RichUK
MDE - have you decided what you are going to do with your heat situation on your X2 3800+?
Originally posted by: Frackal
Buy dual core, dont skimp 100 bucks on this one
Originally posted by: thekillerjks
I was just looking around and I heard good reviews of the X2. I was wondering if the 3800+ X2 blow the 3700+ venice out of the water? Also is it worth the money?
Originally posted by: stevty2889
Originally posted by: thekillerjks
I was just looking around and I heard good reviews of the X2. I was wondering if the 3800+ X2 blow the 3700+ venice out of the water? Also is it worth the money?
It depends a lot on what you do with your computer. If all you are going to do is gaming, the single core still makes more sense for now, although future games are going to take advantage of dual cores. If you do things such as video encoding, or 3D rendering, then the dual core is definatly the better choice. Not that I have any problems gaming on my dual core @2.618ghz.
Originally posted by: mOeeOm
Originally posted by: stevty2889
Originally posted by: thekillerjks
I was just looking around and I heard good reviews of the X2. I was wondering if the 3800+ X2 blow the 3700+ venice out of the water? Also is it worth the money?
It depends a lot on what you do with your computer. If all you are going to do is gaming, the single core still makes more sense for now, although future games are going to take advantage of dual cores. If you do things such as video encoding, or 3D rendering, then the dual core is definatly the better choice. Not that I have any problems gaming on my dual core @2.618ghz.
The 3800+ X2/4200+ X2, what is the equivelant single core? At stock of course.