X1950Xt (256MB) Vs 7900GTO (512) Vs 7950GT (512)

[bluemaverick]

Pick between this 3 cards for a friend... pretty much overall performace for gaming.


Thanks

 

[tuteja1986]

Battlefield 2 1600x1200x32 4xAA 8xAF
$250 X1900XT 256MB : 80.1
$250 7900GTO : 77.3
$200 X1950PRO : 64.2
$250 7900GT : 59.7

Halflife 2 Lost Coast 1600x1200x32 4xAA 8xAF
$250 X1900XT 256MB : 57.2
$250 7900GTO : 51.9
$200 X1950PRO : 43.5
$250 7900GT : 40.9

Fear 1600x1200 0xAA 8xAF
$250 X1900XT 256MB : 47
$250 7900GTO : 41
$200 X1950PRO : 35
$250 7900GT : 34

Quake 4 1600x1200x32 4xAA 8xAF
$250 X1900XT 256MB : 55.1
$250 7900GTO : 55.5
$200 X1950PRO : 40.1
$250 7900GT : 45.4

Call of Duty 2 1600x1200 4xAA 8xAF
$250 X1900XT 256MB : 40.5
$250 7900GTO : 34.9
$200 X1950PRO : 32
$250 7900GT : 30.7

Farcry HDR 1600x1200 0xAA 8xAF
$250 X1900XT 256MB : 54.1
$250 7900GTO : 50
$200 X1950PRO : 44.1
$250 7900GT : 39.5


Oblivion HDR Mountain Area 1600x1200 0xAA 8xAF
$250 X1900XT 256MB : 39.1
$250 7900GTO : 32.5
$200 X1950PRO : 31.3
$250 7900GT : 24.1

Oblivion HDR Foliage Area 1600x1200 0xAA 8xAF
$250 X1900XT 256MB : 26.8
$250 7900GTO : 16.9
$200 X1950PRO : 21.3
$250 7900GT : 12

http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/ati_radeon_x1950_pro/


X1900XT = 256MB , 625Mhz , 1450Mhz , 16(48 Pixel shader processor)
X1950XT = 256MB , 625Mhz , 1800Mhz , 16(48 Pixel shader processor)
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16814102067

In conclusion the X1900XT 256MB beats all and X1950XT beats up X1900XT. Winner is X1950XT
I just keep on posting the same message ;(

 

[cdalgard]

tuteja,

Where does the 7950GT fall into this equation? I feel like the 7950GT beats the X1900XT 256mb in a few benchmarks but mostly the X1900XT wins. And where do we find benchmarks for the X1950XT 256? Are there any out there? Thanks in advance.

 

[tuteja1986]

I doubt it... 7900GTO beat 7950GT in almost every benchmark , it was about 15% faster than 7900GT... anyways i have posted this benchmark many time because people keep asking same question.

 

[akshayt]

Why not get a 512mb 1900xt or 1900xtx instead.

 

[Kromis]

Originally posted by: akshayt
Why not get a 512mb 1900xt or 1900xtx instead.

Because they suck.

 

[cdalgard]

tuteja, I now agree with you that the 7900gto > 7950gt after reading http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/evga_e-geforce_7900_gto/ but the problem is it looks like the card is rare at best. So it really comes back to X1950xt 256mb at $260 > 7950gt at $230.

 

[Munky]

Check out some more benches in this article:
http://www.hardware.fr/articles/639-3/comparatif-gpu-dx9-200-350.html

They used the x1900xt 256, and it was overall faster than both the 7900gto and the 7950gt. The x1950xt would be even faster still.