x1900 AIW Currently at 93C under load with ATI tool...

D22

Senior member
Nov 13, 2004
396
0
0
How bad is this? I have been running the artifact test for like 6 minutes now. I am just waiting for this thing to crash. It is running at default clocks...

It is also showing as 35.5A, is this normal?

Edit - now at 97C 20 minutes in
 

Captante

Lifer
Oct 20, 2003
30,340
10,859
136
Not as bad as you might think but it does still seem a bit high... it may be that the fan isn't ramping up quickly enough to keep tempeture in check, so I suggest you try installing either ATI tool or RIVA Tuner to increase the fan speed manually & see if that helps.
 

Ayah

Platinum Member
Jan 1, 2006
2,512
1
81
The temp is pretty high, but it isn't as crazy as you might think.
 

Maximilian

Lifer
Feb 8, 2004
12,604
15
81
Theyre supposed to run hot. Its one of the reasons i always thought about ditching mine and getting a 79xx and when it eventually broke thats just what i did.
 

D22

Senior member
Nov 13, 2004
396
0
0
It was just a fan issue after all...manually setting the fan to 100% and then increasing my voltages actually lowered my temps drastically to the 80's under load.

And wow I am bottlenecked by my CPU even more than I thought...I just overclocked it to 1.98ghz with a 220 bus running 1:1 and my 3dmark05 score jumped over 500 points...to 5950. That is low as hell for an x1900 at these clocks though...

I got my card stable 637 core/639 memory so that is actually a pretty damn good AIW overclock. I bumped my voltages but the temps are lower now oddly enough. I guess now I have to decide on either grabbing a A64 3400+ or 3700+ for the cheapo upgrade or core 2 but then I have to flip my entire platform...At least I know right now I won't really take any performance hit at 1650x1080 even if I max everything for my GPU
 

moonboy403

Golden Member
Aug 18, 2004
1,828
0
76
when you overclock your cpu, the in game difference isn't as big as you might think

3dmark shows otherwise simply because it's a synthetic benchmark tool