ww2 shooter

w33bo

Senior member
Jan 4, 2004
208
0
0
just bought medal of honor, allied assault, but i was also looking at call of duty and battlefield 1942

did i make the right choice? should i return it and get one of the other two instead???

which one is the best

thanks for any quick replies

Daniel
 

Jayczar

Golden Member
Aug 28, 2001
1,628
1
81
Well if you like to play online BF 1942 is the clear choice, but if you
prefer single player games C.O.D is awesome and Medal of Honor
is a classic, especially if you have never played it.

This is of course jusy my opinion. :)
 

Schadenfroh

Elite Member
Mar 8, 2003
38,416
4
0
Get both

1942 has supperior multiplayer and a great mod called desert combat
COD has one of the best single player i have ever played
 

Super56K

Golden Member
Feb 27, 2004
1,390
0
0
You honestly can't make a bad choice with choosing any of those 3 games. MOH:AA has awesome single player missions. So does call of duty but I honestly think call of duty is a little bit too intense. I couldn't ever sit down for more than an hour playing COD. While i've actually beat medal of honor a couple times. There awesome games though. And battlefield is pretty much a multiplayer/lan party game. I own it and play it single player a lot but the game really shines when your playing it with your friends or on the net.
 

jfall

Diamond Member
Oct 31, 2000
5,975
2
0
MOH:AA is a great game, I thought call of duty was better.. but I would still highly recommend playing MOH:AA and the expanion pack
 

Shagga

Diamond Member
Nov 9, 1999
4,421
0
76
Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
Get both

1942 has supperior multiplayer and a great mod called desert combat
COD has one of the best single player i have ever played

I would agree, but you need cable/broadband to play 1942 online. It's a biatch on Dial-up... :(