- Jun 27, 2004
- 254
- 0
- 76
Originally posted by: Meuge
It's a private company. They can do anything they want.
Originally posted by: Gimli43Orcs
Originally posted by: Meuge
It's a private company. They can do anything they want.
But you still need a legit reason for firing somebody. He was fired cuz there was no evidence???
Originally posted by: Gimli43Orcs
Originally posted by: Meuge
It's a private company. They can do anything they want.
But you still need a legit reason for firing somebody. He was fired cuz there was no evidence???
Originally posted by: LoKe
Clearly he was hiding something that he didn't want them to find.
Originally posted by: supafly
Originally posted by: LoKe
Clearly he was hiding something that he didn't want them to find.
Exactly what I was going to say.
You're not going to try hiding something that's not worth hiding.
Originally posted by: Gimli43Orcs
Read the section titled Risky Business: Stealth Surfing at Work
Can they do something like that???
Originally posted by: Meuge
Originally posted by: supafly
Originally posted by: LoKe
Clearly he was hiding something that he didn't want them to find.
Exactly what I was going to say.
You're not going to try hiding something that's not worth hiding.
Bullshit. I use TrueCrypt to keep an encrypted partition with my "My Documents" folder, yet I have nothing incriminating there. The kind of thinking (or rather its absence) that you exhibited is going to lead us to a police state.
Originally posted by: Meuge
Originally posted by: supafly
Originally posted by: LoKe
Clearly he was hiding something that he didn't want them to find.
Exactly what I was going to say.
You're not going to try hiding something that's not worth hiding.
Bullshit. I use TrueCrypt to keep an encrypted partition with my "My Documents" folder, yet I have nothing incriminating there. The kind of thinking (or rather its absence) that you exhibited is going to lead us to a police state.
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: Meuge
Originally posted by: supafly
Originally posted by: LoKe
Clearly he was hiding something that he didn't want them to find.
Exactly what I was going to say.
You're not going to try hiding something that's not worth hiding.
Bullshit. I use TrueCrypt to keep an encrypted partition with my "My Documents" folder, yet I have nothing incriminating there. The kind of thinking (or rather its absence) that you exhibited is going to lead us to a police state.
On your PC or your work PC?
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: Meuge
Originally posted by: supafly
Originally posted by: LoKe
Clearly he was hiding something that he didn't want them to find.
Exactly what I was going to say.
You're not going to try hiding something that's not worth hiding.
Bullshit. I use TrueCrypt to keep an encrypted partition with my "My Documents" folder, yet I have nothing incriminating there. The kind of thinking (or rather its absence) that you exhibited is going to lead us to a police state.
On a business' computer systems, you stick to their guidelines or you get fired. Having something to hide is completely irrelevant in this case.
Originally posted by: GeekDrew
Originally posted by: Gimli43Orcs
Originally posted by: Meuge
It's a private company. They can do anything they want.
But you still need a legit reason for firing somebody. He was fired cuz there was no evidence???
No, many companies do not need a legit reason for firing somebody.
Originally posted by: Gimli43Orcs
Originally posted by: GeekDrew
Originally posted by: Gimli43Orcs
Originally posted by: Meuge
It's a private company. They can do anything they want.
But you still need a legit reason for firing somebody. He was fired cuz there was no evidence???
No, many companies do not need a legit reason for firing somebody.
Umm..sure. Just be prepared for a costly wrongful dismissal suit
Originally posted by: Gimli43Orcs
Originally posted by: GeekDrew
Originally posted by: Gimli43Orcs
Originally posted by: Meuge
It's a private company. They can do anything they want.
But you still need a legit reason for firing somebody. He was fired cuz there was no evidence???
No, many companies do not need a legit reason for firing somebody.
Umm..sure. Just be prepared for a costly wrongful dismissal suit
Originally posted by: Gimli43Orcs
Originally posted by: GeekDrew
Originally posted by: Gimli43Orcs
Originally posted by: Meuge
It's a private company. They can do anything they want.
But you still need a legit reason for firing somebody. He was fired cuz there was no evidence???
No, many companies do not need a legit reason for firing somebody.
Umm..sure. Just be prepared for a costly wrongful dismissal suit
Originally posted by: Gimli43Orcs
Originally posted by: GeekDrew
Originally posted by: Gimli43Orcs
Originally posted by: Meuge
It's a private company. They can do anything they want.
But you still need a legit reason for firing somebody. He was fired cuz there was no evidence???
No, many companies do not need a legit reason for firing somebody.
Umm..sure. Just be prepared for a costly wrongful dismissal suit
Originally posted by: supafly
Originally posted by: LoKe
Clearly he was hiding something that he didn't want them to find.
Exactly what I was going to say.
You're not going to try hiding something that's not worth hiding.
Originally posted by: yowolabi
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: Meuge
Originally posted by: supafly
Originally posted by: LoKe
Clearly he was hiding something that he didn't want them to find.
Exactly what I was going to say.
You're not going to try hiding something that's not worth hiding.
Bullshit. I use TrueCrypt to keep an encrypted partition with my "My Documents" folder, yet I have nothing incriminating there. The kind of thinking (or rather its absence) that you exhibited is going to lead us to a police state.
On a business' computer systems, you stick to their guidelines or you get fired. Having something to hide is completely irrelevant in this case.
Did they have a guideline that an anonymizer was against the rules? Seems unlikely.
Originally posted by: yowolabi
Did they have a guideline that an anonymizer was against the rules? Seems unlikely.
