• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

WTFBBQ! MS Access 2007 includes a feature that does some good

EyeMWing

Banned
So, here I am at work. We're about 10 seconds from porting a database that has been in Microsoft Access format for WAY TOO LONG to PostgreSQL.

Go to open the DB in Access 2003, and bam: "Database is in an unexpected state. Access can't open it." Try all the run of the mill textbook Google recovery utilities that "should work" - nothing. Nothing at all. The server that housed the backups for this went down yesterday - in what can be reasonably described as a ball of flames. Head crash on the HDD. Bad ******. The file was apparently corrupted sometime before that box went down, because all the backups to the replacement server are all corrupted as well. Backup strategy is being CRITICALLY reevaluated.

We can recover the table data through Excel, but that's not cool, because we intended to reuse all the VBA and forms and ****** as a temporary frontend to the pgSQL database with minimal modifications. As a last resort, one of the sysadmins from another department offers to try to open it in Access 2007 Beta. The damn thing just freakin' worked. No fuss, no whiney errors, it just opened. Save as Access 2003 file. Instantly back into a usable format, with EVERYTHING intact. Literally everything.

I am completely, thoroguhly, and totally impressed with Microsoft - apparently something FUNDAMENTAL actually changed in this version of Access/Office, instead of pretty little enduser bull, and a rejuggling of some toolbar buttons.
 
Originally posted by: EKKC
good thing Access 2007 is free for the moment too, eh?

If it weren't, these guys would've bought it already. They're the beancounter's own personal IT department, so they get priority spending.
 
Originally posted by: tfinch2
Originally posted by: EKKC
Originally posted by: tfinch2
So there was no tape backup of the database?

The server that housed the backups for this went down yesterday - in what can be reasonably described as a ball of flames.

That explains nothing. Why is the backup on a server and not on a tape?

Because whoever was in charge of this DB's creation and planning sucked at everything - hence why it's using access.
 
Originally posted by: z0mb13
Originally posted by: tfinch2
Originally posted by: z0mb13
why are u porting it to postgreSQL? what are the benefits?

What are the benefits of using Access?

ease of use. cheap. easy to maintain.

Just kidding 😀

From what I can tell, there are none. Access makes an okay-ish frontend for a backend SQL server, though (that's our intermediate setup, until we can get the new frontend coded)
 
Back
Top