WTF..Phoenix traffic cameras

SAWYER

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
16,742
42
91
I was in Phoenix last month and had a rental car for the week. I open the mail to find two speeding tickets issued at one minute apart. What a revenue generating scheme that is.
 

jamesbond007

Diamond Member
Dec 21, 2000
5,280
0
71
I was in Phoenix last month and had a rental car for the week. I open the mail to find two speeding tickets issued at one minute apart. What a revenue generating scheme that is.

Don't speed? It's really not that difficult.
 

olds

Elite Member
Mar 3, 2000
50,124
779
126
If the ticket isn't from the courts and it is from a private company, google "snitch ticket".
 

Gibson486

Lifer
Aug 9, 2000
18,378
2
0
Welcome to today's system. I wish you luck in fighting it. You are just gonna get a judge that says "the machine is never wrong".
 

MotF Bane

No Lifer
Dec 22, 2006
60,801
10
0
I was in Phoenix last month and had a rental car for the week. I open the mail to find two speeding tickets issued at one minute apart. What a revenue generating scheme that is.

That's what speed limits really are about.
 

Slick5150

Diamond Member
Nov 10, 2001
8,760
3
81
Ahh.. These threads always inspire the self righteous to come out in droves. Like they've never gone over the speed limit.
 

mmntech

Lifer
Sep 20, 2007
17,501
12
0
Depends how much over you were actually going. Some of these things are set at a ridiculously low trip point. Makes them a cash cow. That's why photo-radar was scrapped in Ontario.

I say fight it. Deters these programs because the city is forced cough up cash to fight them in court.
 

jlee

Lifer
Sep 12, 2001
48,518
223
106
Last I checked, unless they're served by a law enforcement officer, they're not valid. YMMV.

I got flashed by one when I was going 61-63mph in a 65 zone. Go figure. Never received a ticket, though.
 

SearchMaster

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2002
7,791
114
106
Did anyone read the OP? I don't see that he's even complaining about getting *A* speeding ticket, but two during the same "speed run" is ridiculous.

What if a trooper had clocked him 10 times before he slowed down, should he get 10 tickets?
 

SarcasticDwarf

Diamond Member
Jun 8, 2001
9,574
2
76
Did anyone read the OP? I don't see that he's even complaining about getting *A* speeding ticket, but two during the same "speed run" is ridiculous.

What if a trooper had clocked him 10 times before he slowed down, should he get 10 tickets?

In theory all the cameras here in AZ have these lights that flash once VERY brightly when they catch you. Unless the sun is very low on the horizon you should easily be able to notice them.

But yes, still lame.
 

imagoon

Diamond Member
Feb 19, 2003
5,199
0
0
Last I checked, unless they're served by a law enforcement officer, they're not valid. YMMV.

I got flashed by one when I was going 61-63mph in a 65 zone. Go figure. Never received a ticket, though.

Sounds like the stupid red light cams around here. Stop at the line. Stupid thing flashes. They seem to take pictures of the people turning left across the intersection, people driving by in cross traffic etc. Stupid when you have to go in and refute a ticket in traffic court where even the stupid ticket they mail you shows 3 pictures of your car sitting at the (behind) line but the machine says you blew the light at 30 mph, 45 seconds in to the red...
 

jlee

Lifer
Sep 12, 2001
48,518
223
106
Sounds like the stupid red light cams around here. Stop at the line. Stupid thing flashes. They seem to take pictures of the people turning left across the intersection, people driving by in cross traffic etc. Stupid when you have to go in and refute a ticket in traffic court where even the stupid ticket they mail you shows 3 pictures of your car sitting at the (behind) line but the machine says you blew the light at 30 mph, 45 seconds in to the red...

Yep.

I can't help but wonder where speed cameras fall under the whole due process issue...if you take it to court, who's the witness? If someone was monitoring the cameras, I'd understand that - but a strictly autonomous system blindly issuing tickets doesn't seem right.

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district where in the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence

Then again, we don't have speed/red light cameras here so I've never had to look into it.
 

BarkingGhostar

Diamond Member
Nov 20, 2009
8,410
1,617
136
I was in Phoenix last month and had a rental car for the week. I open the mail to find two speeding tickets issued at one minute apart. What a revenue generating scheme that is.
How can someone be speeding in two separate incidents within the same minute? 1/4 mile playing? :awe:
 

olds

Elite Member
Mar 3, 2000
50,124
779
126
Yep.

I can't help but wonder where speed cameras fall under the whole due process issue...if you take it to court, who's the witness? If someone was monitoring the cameras, I'd understand that - but a strictly autonomous system blindly issuing tickets doesn't seem right.



Then again, we don't have speed/red light cameras here so I've never had to look into it.
About 4 years ago, I got one in the mail. It was issued by a private company and not the court. I threw it away and have never heard anything about it.
 

Demon-Xanth

Lifer
Feb 15, 2000
20,551
2
81
Yep.

I can't help but wonder where speed cameras fall under the whole due process issue...if you take it to court, who's the witness? If someone was monitoring the cameras, I'd understand that - but a strictly autonomous system blindly issuing tickets doesn't seem right.



Then again, we don't have speed/red light cameras here so I've never had to look into it.

Traffic court isn't criminal court. So the burden of proof is much lower. In traffic court, the officer is assumed to be telling the truth and the defendant is assumed to be lieing. The only people who I've ever heard getting off traffic tickets have done so due to technicalities.

A few places skirted the issue regarding cameras simply by changing the law from a criminal one to a tort.
 

AstroManLuca

Lifer
Jun 24, 2004
15,628
5
81
Traffic court isn't criminal court. So the burden of proof is much lower. In traffic court, the officer is assumed to be telling the truth and the defendant is assumed to be lieing. The only people who I've ever heard getting off traffic tickets have done so due to technicalities.

A few places skirted the issue regarding cameras simply by changing the law from a criminal one to a tort.

Not necessarily. A friend of mine got two obviously wrong tickets from a young cop who was in a bad mood, and he got both of them dismissed. It helped that one of the two tickets was issued for a one-way violation when all he did was turn from a two-way street onto another two-way street.

Then again, that wasn't even in court, it was a pre-trial hearing or something, so the cop wasn't even there. They didn't even argue it, he just told the judge what happened and before he could get out his diagrams the judge had already thrown it out.
 

Aharami

Lifer
Aug 31, 2001
21,205
165
106
Ahh.. These threads always inspire the self righteous to come out in droves. Like they've never gone over the speed limit.

QFT. in threads like this everyone just magically ends up on a horse, a la old spice guy