WTF $#@!!$%#@!$ loosing credits

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
25,542
14,496
136
Windows update turned off. Its a dedicated folding box, so I don't worry about security. Not even AV installed.

As for memory, why would it make it to 100% , then exactly at that point 3 times in a row fail ? and the 2 GPU units never have a problen on that box.

This just doesn't make any sense.
 

Rudy Toody

Diamond Member
Sep 30, 2006
4,267
421
126
Windows update turned off. Its a dedicated folding box, so I don't worry about security. Not even AV installed.

As for memory, why would it make it to 100% , then exactly at that point 3 times in a row fail ? and the 2 GPU units never have a problen on that box.

This just doesn't make any sense.

It can't create the arcfile, which sounds like a permissions problem. No "write" available to the user.

I had a BOINC upgrade change the user name and as a consequence, no write permission. Tough to find, easy to fix.
 

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
25,542
14,496
136
OK. this is windows XP. I am logged in as administrator. This worked for 3 weeks. How could it all of a sudden have a problem like that ? Administrator can do anything. This is not Win7.
 
Last edited:

GLeeM

Elite Member
Apr 2, 2004
7,199
128
106
It can't create the arcfile,
I gotta agree again here - but maybe it doesn't have enough time to write or something? Some of these files are huge. Could it be the way the drive is set to pre-write or something, did anything get changed in bios or OS on how the HD behaves?

Aaarrrgggghhh! These type problems are frustrating :(
 

VirtualLarry

No Lifer
Aug 25, 2001
56,327
10,035
126
I assume that you've done several passes of the RAM with Memtest86+, as well as done a surface-scan of the HD using mfg's diagnostic bootable CD, right?
 

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
25,542
14,496
136
One of the site moderators at F@H is having the same problem as me, with his stock dual Xeon rig. I think they got my attention, and wanted full log files. We will see where this goes.

As for memtest, not since I built the rig a month ago, but its running under rated speed. Also, again, memory errors are random, this is exactly as the 100% mark, and as for the HD, the 2 GPU units are going fine.
 

ZipSpeed

Golden Member
Aug 13, 2007
1,302
169
106
I got a Client Core Communication Error. Mines a bit different from Mark though. My unit finished and uploaded with no problems. As soon as it downloaded a new workunit, I got the error message. The client then tried to delete the WU and get a new one, which resulted in the client crashing.

EDIT: Deleted everything in my FAH folder except for the .exe and .cfg file and rebooted the computer. Loaded up the SMP client, got a new WU and error message again. The client deleted the WU and attempted to download a new one. Seems to be okay now. Bad batch of WUs?
 
Last edited:

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
25,542
14,496
136
I just noticed that the GPU unit on that box are on the old ide drive (on a pci card) and the smp was on the sata, so I just moved it to the IDE drive. I will know in 2 hours if that was it (sata bug ??)
 

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
25,542
14,496
136
OK, this one finished. One of two things fixed it (I shouldn't have done 2 at once, but..) I downclocked from 4.4 to 4.2 (I don't) think that was it, and I moved the directory off the sata drive to the IDE drive ( using a pci card, not the motherboard)

Even though it boots off the sata drive, and thats the OS drive. my gut tell me the "sata bug" did this to me.

I will update this thread as things progress. It may be days now, I am not messing with the setup any time soon. Log file below:

[03:11:48] Completed 250000 out of 250000 steps (100%)
[03:12:00] DynamicWrapper: Finished Work Unit: sleep=10000
[03:12:10]
[03:12:10] Finished Work Unit:
[03:12:10] - Reading up to 52713120 from "work/wudata_03.trr": Read 52713120
[03:12:10] trr file hash check passed.
[03:12:10] - Reading up to 47140748 from "work/wudata_03.xtc": Read 47140748
[03:12:10] xtc file hash check passed.
[03:12:10] edr file hash check passed.
[03:12:10] logfile size: 213455
[03:12:10] Leaving Run
[03:12:11] - Writing 100235263 bytes of core data to disk...
[03:12:14] ... Done.
[03:12:22] - Shutting down core
[03:12:22]
[03:12:22] Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
[03:12:27] CoreStatus = 64 (100)
[03:12:27] Unit 3 finished with 59 percent of time to deadline remaining.
[03:12:27] Updated performance fraction: 0.576281
[03:12:27] Sending work to server
[03:12:27] Project: 6900 (Run 24, Clone 2, Gen 30)


[03:12:27] + Attempting to send results [February 14 03:12:27 UTC]
[03:12:27] - Reading file work/wuresults_03.dat from core
[03:12:27] (Read 100235263 bytes from disk)
[03:12:27] Connecting to http://130.237.232.141:8080/
[03:17:43] Posted data.
[03:17:43] Initial: 0000; - Uploaded at ~305 kB/s
[03:17:47] - Averaged speed for that direction ~241 kB/s
[03:17:47] + Results successfully sent
[03:17:47] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home.
[03:17:47] + Number of Units Completed: 3

[03:17:54] Trying to send all finished work units
[03:17:54] + No unsent completed units remaining.
[03:17:54] - Preparing to get new work unit...
[03:17:54] Cleaning up work directory
[03:17:55] + Attempting to get work packet
[03:17:55] Passkey found
[03:17:55] - Will indicate memory of 3062 MB
[03:17:55] - Detect CPU. Vendor: GenuineIntel, Family: 6, Model: 10, Stepping: 7
[03:17:55] - Connecting to assignment server
[03:17:55] Connecting to http://assign.stanford.edu:8080/
[03:17:55] Posted data.
[03:17:55] Initial: ED82; - Successful: assigned to (130.237.232.141).
[03:17:55] + News From Folding@Home: Welcome to Folding@Home
[03:17:56] Loaded queue successfully.
[03:17:56] Sent data
[03:17:56] Connecting to http://130.237.232.141:8080/
[03:18:04] Posted data.
[03:18:04] Initial: 0000; - Receiving payload (expected size: 24864527)
[03:19:25] - Downloaded at ~299 kB/s
[03:19:25] - Averaged speed for that direction ~512 kB/s
[03:19:25] + Received work.
[03:19:25] Trying to send all finished work units
[03:19:25] + No unsent completed units remaining.
[03:19:25] + Closed connections
[03:19:25]
[03:19:25] + Processing work unit
[03:19:25] Core required: FahCore_a3.exe
[03:19:25] Core found.
[03:19:25] Working on queue slot 04 [February 14 03:19:25 UTC]
[03:19:25] + Working ...
[03:19:25] - Calling '.\FahCore_a3.exe -dir work/ -nice 19 -suffix 04 -np 8 -checkpoint 15 -verbose -lifeline 2192 -version 630'

[03:19:25]
[03:19:25] *------------------------------*
[03:19:25] Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core
[03:19:25] Version 2.22 (Mar 12, 2010)
[03:19:25]
[03:19:25] Preparing to commence simulation
[03:19:25] - Looking at optimizations...
[03:19:25] - Created dyn
[03:19:25] - Files status OK
[03:19:29] - Expanded 24864015 -> 30796293 (decompressed 123.8 percent)
[03:19:29] Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=24864015 data_size=30796293, decompressed_data_size=30796293 diff=0
[03:19:29] - Digital signature verified
[03:19:29]
[03:19:29] Project: 6900 (Run 47, Clone 5, Gen 9)
[03:19:29]
[03:19:30] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[03:19:30] Entering M.D.
[03:19:39] Completed 0 out of 250000 steps (0%)
 
Last edited:

Denithor

Diamond Member
Apr 11, 2004
6,300
23
81
I will second the CCleaner idea, plus completely uninstall the client & install fresh.

I have seen problems before with clients that just suddenly flake out and nothing works until you replace with a fresh copy.