WTF is going on with Obama's DOJ?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Siddhartha

Lifer
Oct 17, 1999
12,505
3
81
Originally posted by: Lemon law
Where does this thread premise of the OP come from? That somehow Obama and new Holder AG should blindly honor the policies and precedents of Gonzales and GWB??????????

How crazy is that? There is a new Sherrif in town and the new Sherrif does not subscribe to the prior policies of GWB&co.

There are consequences to the Republirats screwing up the country, and the American people have already fired the GOP, get over it GOP, you are not the deciders any more.
And to ask the new AG, to ape GOP justice department policy is simply chutzpah, pure, plain, and simple.

If some crazed GOP commenter is upset, its no damn skin off my ass. Its a matter of mind over matter, if we don't care she does not matter. WE simply need to learn to not feed trolls.

Didn't the DOJ void the convictions and dismiss the indictment against Sen Ted Stevens?
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Originally posted by: boomerang
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: boomerang
The times they are-a-changin'.

The Constitution is meaningless to the administration.

White has ruled long enough. It's time for brown to rule.
This is essentially what's happening. This is your answer.

You're insane if you think the whites in America are about to become in the same oppressed situation blacks have been, under their thumb. You make a fool of yourself.
Craig, I know you're a twisted fuck, but don't put words in my mouth. Only you could spin what I wrote into that and I see you've garnered the attention of some other weak minds.

If I'd meant what you're implying, I would have come right out and said it.

You're obsiously one of those posters so vonfused you can't tell what you write yourself; you say 2+2 and deny you said 4. I bolded what you actually wrote to help you.

You're the one who wrote that blacks ("brown") are going to replace whites - and not benevolently, but in a way "The Constitution is meaningless".

You wrote it, and are missing the two balls to stand by what you wrote. You're just not used to having your blather pointed out for what it is and challenged, it appears.

I've seen that deer in the headlights reaction a lot when people in the right-wing talk radio vacuum where everyone nods their head run into the truth.

Huh? What? No one argues with Rush. That's why they give you 24/7 right-wing shows to avoid this sort of confusion when the nonsense is pointed out.

Gee, I wonder why Rush pretty much never has hostile guests on. I don't watch Glenn Beck, but suspect he avoids them too.
 

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,986
3,321
126
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: boomerang
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: boomerang
The times they are-a-changin'.

The Constitution is meaningless to the administration.

White has ruled long enough. It's time for brown to rule.
This is essentially what's happening. This is your answer.

You're insane if you think the whites in America are about to become in the same oppressed situation blacks have been, under their thumb. You make a fool of yourself.
Craig, I know you're a twisted fuck, but don't put words in my mouth. Only you could spin what I wrote into that and I see you've garnered the attention of some other weak minds.

If I'd meant what you're implying, I would have come right out and said it.

You're obsiously one of those posters so vonfused you can't tell what you write yourself; you say 2+2 and deny you said 4. I bolded what you actually wrote to help you.

You're the one who wrote that blacks ("brown") are going to replace whites - and not benevolently, but in a way "The Constitution is meaningless".

You wrote it, and are missing the two balls to stand by what you wrote. You're just not used to having your blather pointed out for what it is and challenged, it appears.

I've seen that deer in the headlights reaction a lot when people in the right-wing talk radio vacuum where everyone nods their head run into the truth.

Huh? What? No one argues with Rush. That's why they give you 24/7 right-wing shows to avoid this sort of confusion when the nonsense is pointed out.

Gee, I wonder why Rush pretty much never has hostile guests on. I don't watch Glenn Beck, but suspect he avoids them too.

earth to BGoomerang.......
You have no better defernse than to deny what you stated??
Craig has called you on what you said.....
Be a man and own up to what you said...........
let me remind you---
Originally posted by: boomerang
The times they are-a-changin'.

The Constitution is meaningless to the administration.

White has ruled long enough. It's time for brown to rule.
This is essentially what's happening. This is your answer.
 

wkabel23

Platinum Member
Dec 7, 2003
2,505
0
0
I don't understand why the charges were dropped. Apparently, no one is interested.

I don't know if I dislike the liberal or conservative zealots more...but looks like we at least get 4 years of the partisanship that worked so well for the Bush admin. Just on the other side of the aisle.

:roll:
 

jonks

Lifer
Feb 7, 2005
13,918
20
81
I've found some small coverage of the story in the mainstream press but nothing extensive or satisfyingly explanatory. If anyone comes across further articles please post em. I'm curious what the other side of the argument is, if there is one.
 

piasabird

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
17,168
60
91
It is the job of election officials to challenge people they do not believe are valid voters. However, I think in some cities the precincts are way too large and there should be more voting locations. These really large voting precincts are a major problem in large cities.

This is very bad when people dont bother to register to vote, then go to vote when they know they never registered to vote. They should just be thrown in jail for impersinating a real voter.