WSJ: Sprint to bet the company on iPhone5

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

boomhower

Diamond Member
Sep 13, 2007
7,228
19
81
A iPhone 5 with Wimax exclusive to Sprint, seriously? I can't believe they would actually waste the time and bandwidth on that article.
 

NoStateofMind

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2005
9,711
6
76
Sprint exclusivity until Q1 is plausible IMO. Certainly it would be easier to fit WiMax into a thinner phone at this point that an LTE radio.
 

senseamp

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
Hopefully they don't jack up prices on us V-Mo $25/month peeps to pay for this :)
 

Dulanic

Diamond Member
Oct 27, 2000
9,951
570
136
That is fucking insane for Sprint to do. Sprint would need to convert all of it's customers to iphones... good luck! It really kind of pisses me off that Apple cost me a higher ETF fee and no more premier status. If it wasn't for unlimited staying.. which Sprint swears it will stay right now... I'd be gone.

I can't imagine that Sprint would do this without some kind of exclusivity for a certain amount of time. It kind of makes sense that they did get that however. Verizon looks to be getting the Prime exclusive for at least a couple of months.
 
Last edited:

Bateluer

Lifer
Jun 23, 2001
27,730
8
0
Sprint may have made a poor move with WiMAX, in hindsight, but I don't see them as being this stupid. Nor do I see Apple being dumb enough to make a single iP5 with a WiMAX radio.

It'll be standard GSM and CDMA radios. I highly doubt any of the iP models will have a real 4G radio, HSPA+ at most.
 

lothar

Diamond Member
Jan 5, 2000
6,674
7
76
What's your math? They generate $4b/year in operating cash flow, half of which goes to capex leaving them with $2b/year to pay down their debt. And they have $5b in the bank right now.

$20b commitment over 4 years = $5b/year. Consumers will pay up front money to buy iPhone, let's say $200 while Sprint pays $400 to Apple, leaving them with a 50% hole in CF in year 1. So with 60+ days AP turnover they will have more than enough cash to cover. If iPhone sales are not as stellar as their "bet" then they can renegotiate with Apple and start not accepting inventory.

Regardless, I thought LightSquared would be posting most of the capex related to LTE infrastructure?
30.5 million iPhones? Sprint only has 52 million customers.
Seems to me like Sprint is betting the farm.

As for LightSquared LTE infrastructure CapEx, that is correct.
 

Pliablemoose

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
25,195
0
56
Meh, BGR is full of it, why would AT&T stock iP5 cases if it'll be exclusive to Sprint?

With the volume the iPhone does, Sprint agreeing to sell a ton of iPhones isn't as crazy as it sounds.

Can't wait for the launch tomorrow.
 

lothar

Diamond Member
Jan 5, 2000
6,674
7
76
Sprint may have made a poor move with WiMAX, in hindsight, but I don't see them as being this stupid. Nor do I see Apple being dumb enough to make a single iP5 with a WiMAX radio.

It'll be standard GSM and CDMA radios. I highly doubt any of the iP models will have a real 4G radio, HSPA+ at most.
They didn't.
If they didn't make the move to WiMax, they would have lost that spectrum.
Use it or lose it.

$20 billion is a lot of money...I'm to lazy to look it up, what is Apple's profit margin on the iPhone?
Paging Pliablemoose...
 

Fox5

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2005
5,957
7
81
Maybe they'll play some kind of crazy game:
Verizon and ATT get "iPhone 4S"
Sprint gets "iPhone 5"
And the phones are identical, except sprint's version uses Wimax, while the ATT/Verizon one is CDMA/UMTS. Which means ATT will offer speeds as fast as Sprint's wimax anyway.
 

silverpig

Lifer
Jul 29, 2001
27,703
11
81
There's no way the next iPhone will be WIMAX only. Everyone else is going LTE, even Sprint themselves.

The only way this is true is if an LTE iPhone 6 launches the month after.
 

Pliablemoose

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
25,195
0
56
They didn't.
If they didn't make the move to WiMax, they would have lost that spectrum.
Use it or lose it.

$20 billion is a lot of money...I'm to lazy to look it up, what is Apple's profit margin on the iPhone?
Paging Pliablemoose...

~61% on the iP4, so about 12B profit over 4 years.
 

s44

Diamond Member
Oct 13, 2006
9,427
16
81
This makes Sprint worthless to non-iPhans. Guess I'm sticking with Verizon.
 

kaerflog

Golden Member
Jul 23, 2010
1,899
4
76
I don't think it will happen but it makes some sense.
Theres rumor that Apple is in short supply of IP5 parts.
So if they couldn't provide enough IP5 for everyone, why not make some money for an exclsuive, lets say 3-6 months.
By that time, they will have enough IP5 to release for everyone.
There is some crazy sense to this.
Theres continuous rumors that Apple will only realease an IP4s but we all know there is a IP5 in the works.
 

Mopetar

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2011
8,081
6,691
136
We'll know for sure what's going to happen in less than twelve hours. Not much sense in speculating at this point.
 

poofyhairguy

Lifer
Nov 20, 2005
14,612
318
126
So glad I am not on Sprint. It is obvious that Sprint's play will be "The Only iPhone With Unlimited Data Still!" Goodbye Sprint's network....
 

Dulanic

Diamond Member
Oct 27, 2000
9,951
570
136
Meh, BGR is full of it, why would AT&T stock iP5 cases if it'll be exclusive to Sprint?

With the volume the iPhone does, Sprint agreeing to sell a ton of iPhones isn't as crazy as it sounds.

Can't wait for the launch tomorrow.

It sounds absolutely insane. Considering Sprint has ~50 million customers, that would mean in the next 2 years nearly 2/3 of Sprint's customers would need to upgrade to the iphone. Here is the issue... less than 1/3 of phones sold are iphones. And even less probably upgrade nearly as often as us crazy users do.

Or Sprint would need to gain at least 10 million customers for the iphone. Considering every carrier (except TMo) carries the same phone, they can't expect to gain THAT many customers.
 

Fingolfin269

Lifer
Feb 28, 2003
17,948
31
91
Or it could be that Sprint thinks it's gamble will expand it's base to some number greater than ~50 million. After all, they're still dangling that unlimited data carrot.
 

Fire&Blood

Platinum Member
Jan 13, 2009
2,331
16
81
For the consumer's sake, I wish Sprint could put a dent in VZW or AT&T's numbers. Even if this rumor were true, Sprint might actually attract more of the T-Mo crowd for the iphone but I don't think they can attract massive defections from VZW or AT&T.
 

lothar

Diamond Member
Jan 5, 2000
6,674
7
76
Their stock was down -10% yesterday on news of this report and it's down another -10% today again.
Those people who jumped on Sprint in the stock market thread 1-2 months ago might lose their shirts if they bet their farm on Sprint the same way Sprint is betting their farm on the iPhone.
 

JS80

Lifer
Oct 24, 2005
26,271
7
81
30.5 million iPhones? Sprint only has 52 million customers.
Seems to me like Sprint is betting the farm.

As for LightSquared LTE infrastructure CapEx, that is correct.

If Sprint is unable to sell the "committed" contracted amount, they will just force Apple to the table and renegotiate or breach the contract out right. The 30.5 million number just means the commitment to sell at ass rape rates as long as the sales meets to the contract.