WOW...there are so many GENIUS GERMAN generals in WWII that it is just AMAZING!

wasserkool

Banned
Jul 16, 2005
1,125
0
0
NO! I am not a Nazi Supporter and I hate the SS too. What i am refering to is their regular army generals and some of them are just GENIUS!
 

Mucho

Guest
Oct 20, 2001
8,231
2
0
Originally posted by: wasserkool
NO! I am not a Nazi Supporter and I hate the SS too. What i am refering to is their regular army generals and some of them are just GENIUS!

If thats the case how come they lost?
 

jkersenbr

Golden Member
Jun 22, 2000
1,691
0
0
You are indeed correct. And had they not been hamstrung by the arrogant socialist power hungery Hitler, they might have won the war.
 

GasX

Lifer
Feb 8, 2001
29,033
6
81
The German military's whole doctrine of warfare was light years ahead of anyone else's at the beginning of the war. By the time everyone else had figured out the basic concepts of blitzkrieg, the German's had mastered it. Does this mean they were geniuses or just operating a superior war machine?
 

wasserkool

Banned
Jul 16, 2005
1,125
0
0
They lost because hitler went mad. But their generals kept their composure and did their best job as a professional soldier. Morever, german generals are more caring for their troops compared to the Japanese. They know when the cause is lost and surrender, saving many lives and agony.
 

Analog

Lifer
Jan 7, 2002
12,755
3
0
Originally posted by: wasserkool
NO! I am not a Nazi Supporter and I hate the SS too. What i am refering to is their regular army generals and some of them are just GENIUS!




W H Y ?
 

shuan24

Platinum Member
Jul 17, 2003
2,558
0
0
how else could they have whooped up on all of europe and almost russia? (and africa too)
 

boredhokie

Senior member
May 7, 2005
625
0
0
Originally posted by: Mwilding
The German military's whole doctrine of warfare was light years ahead of anyone else's at the beginning of the war. By the time everyone else had figured out the basic concepts of blitzkrieg, the German's had mastered it. Does this mean they were geniuses or just operating a superior war machine?

Obviously some sort of intelligence has to go into creating a superior war machine. All the countries then had an equal or better footing economically and military-wise after WW1. Germany was really an underdog and I think the intelligence of their generals is what gave them such an advantage.
 

wasserkool

Banned
Jul 16, 2005
1,125
0
0
Originally posted by: shuan24
how else could they have whooped up on all of europe and almost russia? (and africa too)

Yes, during WWII, the german army (NOT THE SS) are one of the best trained and disciplined army in the world. Even the US army who oversaw the surrender in Europe were impressed by their professionalism. When the order is given to surrender, they do it in a professional manner marching as on unit. If that was the japanese, they probly have all did a last minute BANZAI charge
 

shuan24

Platinum Member
Jul 17, 2003
2,558
0
0
on a side note, did you watch "Blind Spot: Hilter's Secretary" as well? If so, which one is better?
 

GasX

Lifer
Feb 8, 2001
29,033
6
81
Originally posted by: boredhokie
Originally posted by: Mwilding
The German military's whole doctrine of warfare was light years ahead of anyone else's at the beginning of the war. By the time everyone else had figured out the basic concepts of blitzkrieg, the German's had mastered it. Does this mean they were geniuses or just operating a superior war machine?

Obviously some sort of intelligence has to go into creating a superior war machine. All the countries then had an equal or better footing economically and military-wise after WW1. Germany was really an underdog and I think the intelligence of their generals is what gave them such an advantage.
The advantage was purely political. Germany wanted to prepare for and make war. The Allied countries wanted to avoid a war - to the point of being grossly naive about its inevitability. This drove the different levels of preparation for the war.
 

PingSpike

Lifer
Feb 25, 2004
21,751
595
126
I think had Germany not wasted its resources trying to conquer the soviet union, they probably would have held on to the gains they made for a signifigantly long time. Had it not been for Russia's virtually endless supply of soldiers things certainly would have played out differently.

Hilter made a lot of stupid decisions, but the German army was an impressive war machine.
 

mugs

Lifer
Apr 29, 2003
48,920
46
91
Originally posted by: jkersenbr
You are indeed correct. And had they not been hamstrung by the arrogant socialist power hungery Hitler, they might have won the war.

To what extent? World domination? Or just control of all of Europe? I don't think they could fend off us, Russia and GB forever. We'd have been able to cut off their supply of oil eventually.
 

PurdueRy

Lifer
Nov 12, 2004
13,837
4
0
Too bad one of the generals couldn't accomplish his plans to kill hitler....but thats what rushing will do...
 

Slikkster

Diamond Member
Apr 29, 2000
3,141
0
0
The obligatory disclaimer: Hitler was an evil madman, who with the complicit help of many, many Germans (and others) inside the military and out, killed untold numbers of people. One of the bleakest chapters of world history.

On a strict note about the German military machine: Obviously, they had some brilliant strategists and tactics. Not to mention their scientists. Goodness knows we learned much about jet propulsion from them, and enlisted many in our own space program.

I think that in the end, we were all very fortunate that Hitler as as stupid as he was, in terms of his capacity for military strategy. Had the Germans been content with controlling Europe vs. the fatal push into Russia, I'm afraid things might have been quite different.

Breaking the Enigma codes was extremely important, too.
 

PingSpike

Lifer
Feb 25, 2004
21,751
595
126
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: jkersenbr
You are indeed correct. And had they not been hamstrung by the arrogant socialist power hungery Hitler, they might have won the war.

To what extent? World domination? Or just control of all of Europe? I don't think they could fend off us, Russia and GB forever. We'd have been able to cut off their supply of oil eventually.

They couldn't fend off us, Russia and GB forever but its possible they could have fended off just us and GB. Germany wasted tons of resources on the utterly hopeless and probably unnecessary offensive against the soviet union. Its very difficult to win a two front war, much less one against the production giant of the United States and the sheer manpower of the soviets.

The fact of the matter is, if GB hadn't been an island she would have been overrun just like France. The United States wasn't is much better condition at the onset of the war...our vast distance frm the front allowed us to build up forces.

Hitler made some other stupid decisions, like splitting his sciencists into tons of different teams working on different projects instead of focusing them all on one thing, like the atomic bomb. He had seperate projects going to build a nuclear warhead and a intercontinental missle to carry it to the united states.
 

vtqanh

Diamond Member
Jan 4, 2001
3,100
0
76
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: jkersenbr
You are indeed correct. And had they not been hamstrung by the arrogant socialist power hungery Hitler, they might have won the war.

To what extent? World domination? Or just control of all of Europe? I don't think they could fend off us, Russia and GB forever. We'd have been able to cut off their supply of oil eventually.

Had Hitler focused on the Middle East to control the oil that his tanks/planes much needed and not gone mad for Russia, the outcome would probably have been different.
 

GTaudiophile

Lifer
Oct 24, 2000
29,767
33
81
I just watched "Downfall" last night. WTF did Bruno Ganz not get at least an Oscar nomination?

Fvcking idiot Academy!
 

UpGrD

Golden Member
Oct 9, 1999
1,412
0
0
The true downfall of the German Army was the fact that it supported and supplied its impressive mechanized army with horse and wagon supply trains, and built to few over priced and over complicated war machines. Where as the US army built 3 supply trucks for every tank in Europe. The Sherman tank was no match for the Tiger, but unlike the tiger it ran like a clock and for every Tiger there were 10 Sherman's. There were only actually a handful of qualified German generals, but they were in the right places for the most part.
Fortunately for the Allies the good generals were over ruled by Hitler and is henchman.
 

Triumph

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
15,031
14
81
An even more interesting question to ask would be, "What would Europe be like 20 years after the war if Germany had won?" Now you have the issue of establishing a government to secure vast plots of conquered land, where the people don't want you there anyway. After you are done fighting, how do you go back to living? What exactly did Hitler plan to do after he conquered Europe? Sure we all know about his final solution and all that jazz, but mose of Europe was not a part of that and the German citizens would eventually stop buying into that. He was a crazy dictator, even if he had won I doubt he'd be able to sustain his empire for very long.
 

GasX

Lifer
Feb 8, 2001
29,033
6
81
Originally posted by: UpGrD
The true downfall of the German Army was the fact that it supported and supplied its impressive mechanized army with horse and wagon supply trains, and built to few over priced and over complicated war machines. Where as the US army built 3 supply trucks for every tank in Europe. The Sherman tank was no match for the Tiger, but unlike the tiger it ran like a clock and for every Tiger there were 10 Sherman's. There were only actually a handful of qualified German generals, but they were in the right places for the most part.
Fortunately for the Allies the good generals were over ruled by Hitler and is henchman.
Red Ball Express FTW!