- Jul 16, 2005
- 1,125
- 0
- 0
NO! I am not a Nazi Supporter and I hate the SS too. What i am refering to is their regular army generals and some of them are just GENIUS!
Originally posted by: wasserkool
NO! I am not a Nazi Supporter and I hate the SS too. What i am refering to is their regular army generals and some of them are just GENIUS!
Originally posted by: wasserkool
NO! I am not a Nazi Supporter and I hate the SS too. What i am refering to is their regular army generals and some of them are just GENIUS!
Originally posted by: Mwilding
The German military's whole doctrine of warfare was light years ahead of anyone else's at the beginning of the war. By the time everyone else had figured out the basic concepts of blitzkrieg, the German's had mastered it. Does this mean they were geniuses or just operating a superior war machine?
Originally posted by: shuan24
how else could they have whooped up on all of europe and almost russia? (and africa too)
Originally posted by: shuan24
on a side note, did you watch "Blind Spot: Hilter's Secretary" as well? If so, which one is better?
The advantage was purely political. Germany wanted to prepare for and make war. The Allied countries wanted to avoid a war - to the point of being grossly naive about its inevitability. This drove the different levels of preparation for the war.Originally posted by: boredhokie
Originally posted by: Mwilding
The German military's whole doctrine of warfare was light years ahead of anyone else's at the beginning of the war. By the time everyone else had figured out the basic concepts of blitzkrieg, the German's had mastered it. Does this mean they were geniuses or just operating a superior war machine?
Obviously some sort of intelligence has to go into creating a superior war machine. All the countries then had an equal or better footing economically and military-wise after WW1. Germany was really an underdog and I think the intelligence of their generals is what gave them such an advantage.
Originally posted by: jkersenbr
You are indeed correct. And had they not been hamstrung by the arrogant socialist power hungery Hitler, they might have won the war.
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: jkersenbr
You are indeed correct. And had they not been hamstrung by the arrogant socialist power hungery Hitler, they might have won the war.
To what extent? World domination? Or just control of all of Europe? I don't think they could fend off us, Russia and GB forever. We'd have been able to cut off their supply of oil eventually.
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: jkersenbr
You are indeed correct. And had they not been hamstrung by the arrogant socialist power hungery Hitler, they might have won the war.
To what extent? World domination? Or just control of all of Europe? I don't think they could fend off us, Russia and GB forever. We'd have been able to cut off their supply of oil eventually.
Red Ball Express FTW!Originally posted by: UpGrD
The true downfall of the German Army was the fact that it supported and supplied its impressive mechanized army with horse and wagon supply trains, and built to few over priced and over complicated war machines. Where as the US army built 3 supply trucks for every tank in Europe. The Sherman tank was no match for the Tiger, but unlike the tiger it ran like a clock and for every Tiger there were 10 Sherman's. There were only actually a handful of qualified German generals, but they were in the right places for the most part.
Fortunately for the Allies the good generals were over ruled by Hitler and is henchman.