feralkid
Lifer
- Jan 28, 2002
- 16,866
- 4,979
- 136
nobody said such
Try reading your own post.
You said "rape victims who were assaulted while black out drunk must share at least a small amount of blame."
nobody said such
nobody said such
I don't think so.
I'd mostly feel ashamed for being such an idiot. Fortunately for me, the two times in my life that i have blacked-out, I've only ever injured myself and harmed no one or nothing else.
Honestly, I'm not sure how anyone can really do anything while blacked out. walking is hard enough as it is.
I don't think so.
I'd mostly feel ashamed for being such an idiot. Fortunately for me, the two times in my life that i have blacked-out, I've only ever injured myself and harmed no one or nothing else.
Honestly, I'm not sure how anyone can really do anything while blacked out. walking is hard enough as it is.
oh. seems like people are..
And that's exactly, and the only thing, I am actually pointing out here for the other situation.
It's all about holding a certain level of self-blame, because you put yourself into a situation that you should not have created. Fault and blame in this case are very different. Fault is used for punishment, and nothing changes here imho - the attacker receives full penalty regardless.
But the victim, if they let themselves get blackout drunk, should have it weigh on their conscience. Why? Because you shouldn't get blackout drunk when surrounded by other humans - it's really just a bad idea all around.
That's ultimate what that original ad was really about. And my wording beforehand may have been a little vague... nobody should be putting any blame or fault on the victim... but the victim, if they created the opportunity by getting blackout drunk and leaving their body vulnerable and unguarded, it should weigh on their mind, a "personal level of blame" or whatever... because as an animal, we should NEVER willingly leave our body vulnerable in uncertain environments. That's just a bad approach to life (and a sign you've grown way too complacent, comfortable, ignorant, and naive).
And that's exactly, and the only thing, I am actually pointing out here for the other situation.
It's all about holding a certain level of self-blame, because you put yourself into a situation that you should not have created. Fault and blame in this case are very different. Fault is used for punishment, and nothing changes here imho - the attacker receives full penalty regardless.
But the victim, if they let themselves get blackout drunk, should have it weigh on their conscience. Why? Because you shouldn't get blackout drunk when surrounded by other humans - it's really just a bad idea all around.
That's ultimate what that original ad was really about. And my wording beforehand may have been a little vague... nobody should be putting any blame or fault on the victim... but the victim, if they created the opportunity by getting blackout drunk and leaving their body vulnerable and unguarded, it should weigh on their mind, a "personal level of blame" or whatever... because as an animal, we should NEVER willingly leave our body vulnerable in uncertain environments. That's just a bad approach to life (and a sign you've grown way too complacent, comfortable, ignorant, and naive).
Ah, I get it. It's my fault that criminals exist and want to steal my stuff. Never the victim of crime, always the enabler.
He is perhaps talking about the grey zone ?
Perspective :
Suppose, some girl with a sexy short skirt get black out drunk and takes of her panties for whatever reason. Later on, she ends up dancing and making some popular sexy dance moves. Attracts some guys who also had a very lot to drink. She feels sexy and the guys assume they can go for it since these guys are drunk as well and all end up in a more private setting. The problem, she never had the intention to have sex with either 1 or all guys. The guys are to blame, no doubt about that but the girl has some responsibility here as well.
Now i fully agree with that as long as a woman does not give permission, a man has no right to touch her. Even when she is flirting, as long as she did not give permission, no touching. And even when she gives permission, there are boundaries on how far a man can go in private or public. And i fully agree that stealing is wrong and everything. But there are especially in situations where there is sexual tension grey zones that both parties must keep in mind.
To come back to the example :
The problem in this scenario is that both parties can no longer be trusted since both are drunk. When people get drunk, these things happen. Thus who should be the most wise ? The girl or the man ? I say both have equal responsibility, but reality predicts that a girl/ woman is much more safe if she is not drunk unless with people who she can trust that will not take advantage of her. There are not a lot of men, boys out there who would not take the chance for sex . Especially with a "hot" drunk lady friend.
Let's not be confusing drunken consensual sex with rape.
the victim of rape is NEVER at fault. no matter how idiots want to spin it. that's just silly to place the blame on the victim when someone else did the act.
the victim of rape is NEVER at fault. no matter how idiots want to spin it. that's just silly to place the blame on the victim when someone else did the act.
Usually one leg would be out of the panties, correct me if I'm wrong here.
And that's exactly, and the only thing, I am actually pointing out here for the other situation.
It's all about holding a certain level of self-blame, because you put yourself into a situation that you should not have created. Fault and blame in this case are very different. Fault is used for punishment, and nothing changes here imho - the attacker receives full penalty regardless.
But the victim, if they let themselves get blackout drunk, should have it weigh on their conscience. Why? Because you shouldn't get blackout drunk when surrounded by other humans - it's really just a bad idea all around.
That's ultimate what that original ad was really about. And my wording beforehand may have been a little vague... nobody should be putting any blame or fault on the victim... but the victim, if they created the opportunity by getting blackout drunk and leaving their body vulnerable and unguarded, it should weigh on their mind, a "personal level of blame" or whatever... because as an animal, we should NEVER willingly leave our body vulnerable in uncertain environments. That's just a bad approach to life (and a sign you've grown way too complacent, comfortable, ignorant, and naive).
Do you believe females that wear "short" shorts deserve to be raped and/or deserve some of the blame? :hmm:
no
HOLY FUCK WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU?
![]()
Let's not be confusing drunken consensual sex with rape.
