You're going to have to plan it with a good aliby then!Originally posted by: Kanalua
I told my wife that if somehow she died under auspicious terms like that, her parents would immediately think I killed her. They're like that...
I love that crap. If it wasn't the hubby that did it (and I really doubt he did, just because of the "went home for lunch" part... The timing would be way too tight..) then whoever did it may just be randomly knocking on doors!"There is . . . no evidence to indicate that anyone in the community should be in fear," Poteet said. "This is an isolated incident."
I think you mean "suspicious terms", but even that seems a bit wrong. Maybe "violent" would be a better word.Originally posted by: Kanalua
I told my wife that if somehow she died under auspicious terms like that, her parents would immediately think I killed her. They're like that...
Nope. The police arent legally responsible for your protection. The name of the USSC case that decided this has momentarily escaped me, but I'll think of it... or Amused will post in this thread, one of the twoOriginally posted by: DurocShark
I love that crap. If it wasn't the hubby that did it (and I really doubt he did, just because of the "went home for lunch" part... The timing would be way too tight..) then whoever did it may just be randomly knocking on doors!"There is . . . no evidence to indicate that anyone in the community should be in fear," Poteet said. "This is an isolated incident."
My question is that if the Police tell everyone it's an "isolated incident", then can the family of the next victim sue the cops? :Q
No indication of any break end, husband went home to check on wife. I would imagine she is insured as well...I definitely would not want to be in the husbands shoes whether he did it or not.Originally posted by: Elemental007
That is the definite bias you get from the newspaper article. Especially how they kept on emphasizing she was pregnant. In this country you are innocent until proven guilty though. But this is not a thread for accusations.Originally posted by: iwearnosox
I wan't kidding in my post, odds are better than not that when something like this happens it's the spouse that's behind it. We'll see, though. If he's not, my condolences.
Yeah...definitelyOriginally posted by: Nitemare
No indication of any break end, husband went home to check on wife. I would imagine she is insured as well...I definitely would not want to be in the husbands shoes whether he did it or not.Originally posted by: Elemental007
That is the definite bias you get from the newspaper article. Especially how they kept on emphasizing she was pregnant. In this country you are innocent until proven guilty though. But this is not a thread for accusations.Originally posted by: iwearnosox
I wan't kidding in my post, odds are better than not that when something like this happens it's the spouse that's behind it. We'll see, though. If he's not, my condolences.
I was just about to say that. Especially if there's no sign of entry or anything stolen. It's a terrible thing thoughOriginally posted by: iwearnosox
I wan't kidding in my post, odds are better than not that when something like this happens it's the spouse that's behind it. We'll see, though. If he's not, my condolences.