• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Wow! I got 4 billion frames per second!

C

coolpurplefan

Golden Member
Well, I have no idea what caused this particular "bug" but I have a screenshot that shows that I have 4 billion frames per second in UT2004. It's odd because I only have an X2 5400+ and HD 4670, lol. Anyway, here's the screenshot:

http://sharebee.com/c34c9652

I also included two 1600x1200 screenshots of a Quicktime 1080p movie trailer. I have a 17 inch Sony CRT capable of 1600x1200 so I think it may not appear "full size".

I kind of feel like bragging about my e-penis, but then, it wouldn't be believable.
 
That's very close to the size of a 32-bit unsigned integer (not exactly equal since UT averages stuff out before it shows it). Maybe your video card really did render the frame in a negligible amount of time and something got divided by zero? 🙂
 
Originally posted by: Quiksilver
.bmp files suck and so did that link.

Also sames the QT movie screenshots were completely unimportant here's a re-link to the important image.

http://i36.tinypic.com/6t2q9c.png
Click to expand...

Really? I thought the QT screenshots were impressive. Is it that good on most video cards?

Anywho, the .bmp files were over 3mb so I couldn't upload on imageshack. And jpeg is not the same quality.
 
My Norton Antivirus (corporate edition) popped up when I went to that site, and blocked IP traffic from it - some serious malware with that link.
 
Unsigned long integer: 0 to +4,294,967,295
the average fps is 2 less then this number... so i guess that is an FPS of 3 and it is subtracted instead of added to 0 in a long integer. (or something is subtracted and something is added in some fuzzy math)
the cur FPS (what is cur?) is 100 below that number
 
Originally posted by: coolpurplefan
Originally posted by: Quiksilver
.bmp files suck and so did that link.

Also sames the QT movie screenshots were completely unimportant here's a re-link to the important image.

http://i36.tinypic.com/6t2q9c.png
Click to expand...

Really? I thought the QT screenshots were impressive. Is it that good on most video cards?

Anywho, the .bmp files were over 3mb so I couldn't upload on imageshack. And jpeg is not the same quality.
Click to expand...

jpeg is fine when used right. Here's a example of a high quality jpeg and it's only 1.19MB.

http://i38.tinypic.com/tah35s.jpg
 
Originally posted by: SSChevy2001
Originally posted by: coolpurplefan
Originally posted by: Quiksilver
.bmp files suck and so did that link.

Also sames the QT movie screenshots were completely unimportant here's a re-link to the important image.

http://i36.tinypic.com/6t2q9c.png
Click to expand...

Really? I thought the QT screenshots were impressive. Is it that good on most video cards?

Anywho, the .bmp files were over 3mb so I couldn't upload on imageshack. And jpeg is not the same quality.
Click to expand...

jpeg is fine when used right. Here's a example of a high quality jpeg and it's only 1.19MB.

http://i38.tinypic.com/tah35s.jpg
Click to expand...

Oh, OK. I used Paint. What kind of program did you use?

I got a free version of Photoimpact with my Asus motherboard.

I should add that the X2 5400+ and HD4670 gave me a 7841 score on 3DMark06.
 
4294967295 is the max unsigned 32bit integer
your fps is a bit lower than that, so you have some room for improvement 😛
maybe your PC clock is stuck? or going backwards?
maybe you have 100fps but somehow it reads it as -100?
 
Originally posted by: coolpurplefan
Anywho, the .bmp files were over 3mb so I couldn't upload on imageshack. And jpeg is not the same quality.
Click to expand...

Who cares about quality when all you're doing is giving us a game screenshot? MSPAINT does JPG and PNG, both better than BMP.
 
Originally posted by: coolpurplefan
I should add that the X2 5400+ and HD4670 gave me a 7841 score on 3DMark06.
Click to expand...

That is strange. On my stock 5000+ BE and HD3850 512MB, I got 8455 in 3DMark06. When I overclocked both, I was able to get a score of 9900.

That 128 bit memory bus in the HD4670 must be holding it back quite a bit.
 
Originally posted by: cusideabelincoln
Originally posted by: coolpurplefan
I should add that the X2 5400+ and HD4670 gave me a 7841 score on 3DMark06.
Click to expand...

That is strange. On my stock 5000+ BE and HD3850 512MB, I got 8455 in 3DMark06. When I overclocked both, I was able to get a score of 9900.

That 128 bit memory bus in the HD4670 must be holding it back quite a bit.
Click to expand...

nothing a memory OC cant fix 😀
 
Originally posted by: Scholzpdx
My 3dmark06 is 8002. Your score is lower. What gives?
Click to expand...

What kind of CPU do you have? In any case, that was still with an invalid copy of WinXP. I want to use this until CAT 8.10 comes out before installing a legit copy of WinXP Media Center Edition.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top