Wow! I got 4 billion frames per second!

[coolpurplefan]

Well, I have no idea what caused this particular "bug" but I have a screenshot that shows that I have 4 billion frames per second in UT2004. It's odd because I only have an X2 5400+ and HD 4670, lol. Anyway, here's the screenshot:

http://sharebee.com/c34c9652

I also included two 1600x1200 screenshots of a Quicktime 1080p movie trailer. I have a 17 inch Sony CRT capable of 1600x1200 so I think it may not appear "full size".

I kind of feel like bragging about my e-penis, but then, it wouldn't be believable.

 

[LittleNemoNES]

too hard to get to.
Too many ads -- feels like spam.

 

[tuteja1986]

spam spam spam :!

 

[SunnyD]

I know ATI had kickass price/performance... but geez!

 

[BladeVenom]

I think most people would have preferred just a simple screenshot.

 

[Drsignguy]

That link bytes.

 

[Quiksilver]

.bmp files suck and so did that link.

Also sames the QT movie screenshots were completely unimportant here's a re-link to the important image.

http://i36.tinypic.com/6t2q9c.png

 

[xtknight]

That's very close to the size of a 32-bit unsigned integer (not exactly equal since UT averages stuff out before it shows it). Maybe your video card really did render the frame in a negligible amount of time and something got divided by zero?

 

[coolpurplefan]

Originally posted by: Quiksilver
.bmp files suck and so did that link.

Also sames the QT movie screenshots were completely unimportant here's a re-link to the important image.

http://i36.tinypic.com/6t2q9c.png

Really? I thought the QT screenshots were impressive. Is it that good on most video cards?

Anywho, the .bmp files were over 3mb so I couldn't upload on imageshack. And jpeg is not the same quality.

 

[kmmatney]

My Norton Antivirus (corporate edition) popped up when I went to that site, and blocked IP traffic from it - some serious malware with that link.

 

[taltamir]

Unsigned long integer: 0 to +4,294,967,295
the average fps is 2 less then this number... so i guess that is an FPS of 3 and it is subtracted instead of added to 0 in a long integer. (or something is subtracted and something is added in some fuzzy math)
the cur FPS (what is cur?) is 100 below that number

 

[SSChevy2001]

Originally posted by: coolpurplefan

Originally posted by: Quiksilver
.bmp files suck and so did that link.

Also sames the QT movie screenshots were completely unimportant here's a re-link to the important image.

http://i36.tinypic.com/6t2q9c.png

Really? I thought the QT screenshots were impressive. Is it that good on most video cards?

Anywho, the .bmp files were over 3mb so I couldn't upload on imageshack. And jpeg is not the same quality.

jpeg is fine when used right. Here's a example of a high quality jpeg and it's only 1.19MB.

http://i38.tinypic.com/tah35s.jpg

 

[coolpurplefan]

Originally posted by: SSChevy2001

Originally posted by: coolpurplefan

Originally posted by: Quiksilver
.bmp files suck and so did that link.

Also sames the QT movie screenshots were completely unimportant here's a re-link to the important image.

http://i36.tinypic.com/6t2q9c.png

Really? I thought the QT screenshots were impressive. Is it that good on most video cards?

Anywho, the .bmp files were over 3mb so I couldn't upload on imageshack. And jpeg is not the same quality.

jpeg is fine when used right. Here's a example of a high quality jpeg and it's only 1.19MB.

http://i38.tinypic.com/tah35s.jpg

Oh, OK. I used Paint. What kind of program did you use?

I got a free version of Photoimpact with my Asus motherboard.

I should add that the X2 5400+ and HD4670 gave me a 7841 score on 3DMark06.

 

[TurtleCrusher]

My 3dmark06 is 8002. Your score is lower. What gives?

 

[Visual]

4294967295 is the max unsigned 32bit integer
your fps is a bit lower than that, so you have some room for improvement
maybe your PC clock is stuck? or going backwards?
maybe you have 100fps but somehow it reads it as -100?

 

[theprodigalrebel]

Your CPU is holding you back.

 

[Zap]

Originally posted by: coolpurplefan
Anywho, the .bmp files were over 3mb so I couldn't upload on imageshack. And jpeg is not the same quality.

Who cares about quality when all you're doing is giving us a game screenshot? MSPAINT does JPG and PNG, both better than BMP.

 

[ronnn]

I got 4 billion ads, but no screen shot.

 

[cusideabelincoln]

Originally posted by: coolpurplefan
I should add that the X2 5400+ and HD4670 gave me a 7841 score on 3DMark06.

That is strange. On my stock 5000+ BE and HD3850 512MB, I got 8455 in 3DMark06. When I overclocked both, I was able to get a score of 9900.

That 128 bit memory bus in the HD4670 must be holding it back quite a bit.

 

[SSChevy2001]

Originally posted by: coolpurplefan

Originally posted by: SSChevy2001
jpeg is fine when used right. Here's a example of a high quality jpeg and it's only 1.19MB.

http://i38.tinypic.com/tah35s.jpg

Oh, OK. I used Paint. What kind of program did you use?

I got a free version of Photoimpact with my Asus motherboard.

Adobe Photoshop.

 

[Fox5]

Install the AMD dual core optimizer.

 

[faxon]

Originally posted by: cusideabelincoln

Originally posted by: coolpurplefan
I should add that the X2 5400+ and HD4670 gave me a 7841 score on 3DMark06.

That is strange. On my stock 5000+ BE and HD3850 512MB, I got 8455 in 3DMark06. When I overclocked both, I was able to get a score of 9900.

That 128 bit memory bus in the HD4670 must be holding it back quite a bit.

nothing a memory OC cant fix

 

[coolpurplefan]

Originally posted by: Scholzpdx
My 3dmark06 is 8002. Your score is lower. What gives?

What kind of CPU do you have? In any case, that was still with an invalid copy of WinXP. I want to use this until CAT 8.10 comes out before installing a legit copy of WinXP Media Center Edition.