Originally posted by: techs
Would you use an ATM that didn't give a receipt?
And in case of dispute there would be no way to verify who was right.
So why would you use a voting machine that doesn't give a receipt or have a way to verify your vote was counted accurately?
Just curious.
Why is it a bad comparison? Diebold makes ATM machines.Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
I always select the "No receipt" option at the ATM
Bad comparison
Originally posted by: RichardE
My Atm withdrawl will not decide my life for the next 4 years.
My vote could.
next
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
Originally posted by: RichardE
My Atm withdrawl will not decide my life for the next 4 years.
My vote could.
next
And if you're halfway intelligent you would still refuse to use an ATM that was incapable of printing a receipt at all, even if you declined to have it actually print one most of the time.
The analogy actually holds up pretty well.
Originally posted by: Jeff7
The problem remains though - the machines themselves aren't secure. The group at Princeton that hacked a voting machine were able to make it so that the machine's own self-diagnostics reported that everything was running normally. Wouldn't it also be possible to plant a virus that'd print out an accurate receipt while incrementing the vote for the wrong candidate? The source code should be released, revised, and the machines should then be tested at random to ensure that they are in fact using the revised code.
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
Originally posted by: RichardE
My Atm withdrawl will not decide my life for the next 4 years.
My vote could.
next
And if you're halfway intelligent you would still refuse to use an ATM that was incapable of printing a receipt at all, even if you declined to have it actually print one most of the time.
The analogy actually holds up pretty well.
No, it doesn't.
A better analogy would be would you accept a contract without a copy of it, or without being able to sign it, yet still have it be legally binding. The only hope you have it is what you want is what you said it was what you wanted it to be.
That is what you are doing with those voting machines.
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
Originally posted by: RichardE
My Atm withdrawl will not decide my life for the next 4 years.
My vote could.
next
And if you're halfway intelligent you would still refuse to use an ATM that was incapable of printing a receipt at all, even if you declined to have it actually print one most of the time.
The analogy actually holds up pretty well.
No, it doesn't.
A better analogy would be would you accept a contract without a copy of it, or without being able to sign it, yet still have it be legally binding. The only hope you have it is what you want is what you said it was what you wanted it to be.
That is what you are doing with those voting machines.
You do that all the time, when you buy phone, internet, and other services and it says on the contract 'we reserve the right to change the terms of this contract without asking your permission' or words to that effect.
I frankly do not understand why you are making this argument, because while not identical (thus the term 'analogy') the two situations are clearly similar.
Do you get bank statements every month?Originally posted by: RichardE
They are not though unless you like breaking things down into the very smallest terms.
Originally posted by: her209
Do you get bank statements every month?Originally posted by: RichardE
They are not though unless you like breaking things down into the very smallest terms.
Okay and what about electronic bank statements?Originally posted by: RichardE
No I don't. Paperless banking.Originally posted by: her209
Do you get bank statements every month?Originally posted by: RichardE
They are not though unless you like breaking things down into the very smallest terms.
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
Originally posted by: RichardE
My Atm withdrawl will not decide my life for the next 4 years.
My vote could.
next
And if you're halfway intelligent you would still refuse to use an ATM that was incapable of printing a receipt at all, even if you declined to have it actually print one most of the time.
The analogy actually holds up pretty well.
No, it doesn't.
A better analogy would be would you accept a contract without a copy of it, or without being able to sign it, yet still have it be legally binding. The only hope you have it is what you want is what you said it was what you wanted it to be.
That is what you are doing with those voting machines.
You do that all the time, when you buy phone, internet, and other services and it says on the contract 'we reserve the right to change the terms of this contract without asking your permission' or words to that effect.
I frankly do not understand why you are making this argument, because while not identical (thus the term 'analogy') the two situations are clearly similar.
They are not though unless you like breaking things down into the very smallest terms.
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Originally posted by: techs
Would you use an ATM that didn't give a receipt?
And in case of dispute there would be no way to verify who was right.
So why would you use a voting machine that doesn't give a receipt or have a way to verify your vote was counted accurately?
Just curious.
I always select the "No receipt" option at the ATM
Bad comparison
