• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Would you sacrifice resolution for graphical quality?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Would you sacrifice resolution for graphical quality?

  • Yes

  • No

  • I have other ideas


Results are only viewable after voting.
I definitely prefer to play Crysis at 720p with higher quality settings than at 1080p with lower quality setting. Sometimes I prefer 720p with AA than 1080p with no AA because for most games jaggies are still very noticeable at 1080p no AA.
 
Resolution is my first criteria. If it supports 2560x1600 then that's what it runs at and I lower graphical settings when needed to get smooth framerates.
 
Wow, amazing replies guys!

My 8600GT is ancient ?!? :'( Oh well, I don't think I could expect anything else. I bought that about 2 or 3 years ago anyway. But, the only game I've ever really tried out with it was Oblivion. I got TLR recently enough, so it just doesn't feel like I got my money's worth from the card. Still ... I know what you mean.

I think I've heard of the LCD vs CRT argument before. But I'm still going to go with non-native resolutions. Looks good enough for me!

Even, back when I used to play Oblivion, I think I set the resolution to lower than my native one, as I wanted to up all the other graphical settings. I just don't see the point of playing a game with the eye-candy set low.

To keep playing at a distance from my monitor, I've ordered a gamepad. This one - Saitek P3600 Cyborg Rumble Pad

-chronodekar
 
LCD scale horribly when non-native res, especially if you change aspect ratio (unless you use that silly setting where part of the screen is just black, but then its tiny.). And no AA? Resolution makes up for lack of AA and vice versa... I'd like to have one or the other.
 
Native all the way.

If my graphics card *really* couldn't take it, then I'll go lower, but windowed.
 
On a CRT sure turn down the res is not a problem, on a LCD it looks really bad, its super noticable and i will only Run LCD at native res. Im considering another 4890 just to play crysis at 1080P with some AA on, runs fine at 1080P now but with no AA. And that 8600GT is OLD.
 
Back
Top