Would you have voted to ratify the Constitution if no Bill of Rights was possible?

[Anarchist420]

Which would you prefer? I know that I've asked whether people would prefer the Constitution as it is vs. the Articles of Confederation, but I've never asked about the Constitution without the Bill of Rights vs. the Articles of Confederation.

Everyone here knows that I prefer the Articles of Confederation along with the old republicanism that it allowed for. It was about setting a good example, it would've given the people unprecedented liberty and security, and it was quite possibly the most libertarian government ever known to man.

 

[FallenHero]

Which would you prefer? I know that I've asked whether people would prefer the Constitution as it is vs. the Articles of Confederation, but I've never asked about the Constitution without the Bill of Rights vs. the Articles of Confederation.

Everyone here knows that I prefer the Articles of Confederation along with the old republicanism that it allowed for. It was about setting a good example, it would've given the people unprecedented liberty and security, and it was quite possibly the most libertarian government ever known to man.

It also failed miserably and created chaos among the states. There is a reason we went to the constitution, no matter how much your revisionist views try to paint a different picture.

EDIT: Poll is a sham. The only reason some states even voted for it was because of the promise to pass the bill of rights after ratification. You are just looking to get people to vote saying that they would support the articles of confederation.

 

[Vette73]

^

Its a Perry420 thread so...

 

[piasabird]

Are you an idiot?

Why do you ask all these stupid "Would you Rather...." questions?

Would you rather be an intelligent person or a caveman with a rock for a pillow?