Originally posted by: rahvin
Originally posted by: iwantanewcomputer
QFMFT solar is insanely more expensive. if you take the cost of a solar panel and invest the money in an average yield money market, it is cheaper over any amount of time to just buy the electricity. for solar to become economically viable as a large pwer source, photovoltaics need to come down like 90% in cost, or oil/coal/uranium needs to go up a ton
These calculations are almost uniformly based on the assumption that the panels only last through the warranty period. A very high percentage of panels last much longer than their warranty. Reading one of the solar periodicals it was found that someone that installed a solar array in the 90's would typically have one to two bad panel after 25 years (20-30 years is the typical warranty). We to this day don't know what the MTBF is on the panels so cannot effectively estimate lifetime costs. I don't know about you, but we have had bi-yearly increases in electricity cost out here, 10 years ago power cost 5cents/kwh, now we are pusing 8cents/kwh. If prices continue to increase the panel costs start to become reasonable. IIRC panels are typically good for 15cents/kwh using that 25 year life figure. What the costs really are though is up in the air.
So becareful discussing the financials of PV solar panels because the life cycle costs are based on faulty assumptions of panel life IMO.
edit - I should add that a lot of people are talking about energy storage and battaries, you need to consider that about 50% of the states are net-metering states now, net-metering allows you to plug your panels into the grid and spin the meter backwards while you aren't using the power off the panels.