Would you buy an iPad Mini ~7inch ??

kaerflog

Golden Member
Jul 23, 2010
1,899
4
76
This rumor has been going on for a while but now that Bloomberg and WSJ and also in on it, it makes it a little bit more concrete.
http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/04/ipad-mini-rumors-resurface-like-so-many-leftovers/
This would be similar to the iPad2 with the same 1024x768 but in a smaller 7" screen.
Personally I would definitely get one.
I've had the iPad3 and loved it except for the size.
It gets a bit heavy after a while.
When I'm holding it and playing games, my arms get tire after a while.
I'd rather just use on my 11.6" macbook air.
A 7" inch iPad would definitely be more portable.
I've already ordered a Nexus 7 but I would also get a mini iPad.
I know there are 2 camps. I happened to like the smaller tablet version much better.
 

sgrinavi

Diamond Member
Jul 31, 2007
4,537
0
76
Maybe - I could use one to replace my iPod - Depends on the price & spec
 

Eug

Lifer
Mar 11, 2000
24,051
1,682
126
No. I want microSD support and good 1080p video support other than QuickTime.
 

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,484
8,345
126
An LTE version really interests me. Actually more so than a 10" LTE/3G one does. That way it's a more portable media browser/hotspot device that I could go month to month on when needed. 7" format is also a better size for reading IMHO.

At $250-$299 I think these things will sell like hotcakes.
 

Axon

Platinum Member
Sep 25, 2003
2,541
1
76
An LTE version really interests me. Actually more so than a 10" LTE/3G one does. That way it's a more portable media browser/hotspot device that I could go month to month on when needed. 7" format is also a better size for reading IMHO.

At $250-$299 I think these things will sell like hotcakes.

Agreed on all points, but you know apple would start 'em at $500 :p
 

Eug

Lifer
Mar 11, 2000
24,051
1,682
126
For LTE, I'd be shocked if it came in at $299. More like $429, or $399 if you're really lucky. Maybe a WiFi-only one at $299.
 

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,484
8,345
126
Well, yeah no way a 3G/LTE version would come in at that $249/$299 price point. But I really do think a basic 7" would be under $300 to make it within reach of the Fire/cheap android tabs.
 

Kenmitch

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,505
2,250
136
Hell no....7" is too small and I don't like iOS. To be fair tho I wouldn't buy any 7" tab.
 

HeXen

Diamond Member
Dec 13, 2009
7,835
37
91
7" wouldn't make for an enjoyable or lengthy book or magazine read. i can't imagine trying to read on anything smaller than my ipad for any length of time.
and clicking bunched up links on websites is hard enough on a 9.7" let alone anything smaller.
 

zerocool84

Lifer
Nov 11, 2004
36,041
472
126
7" wouldn't make for an enjoyable or lengthy book or magazine read. i can't imagine trying to read on anything smaller than my ipad for any length of time.
and clicking bunched up links on websites is hard enough on a 9.7" let alone anything smaller.

Yes but 7" is more portable and easier to handle for extended periods of time.
 

HeXen

Diamond Member
Dec 13, 2009
7,835
37
91
Yes but 7" is more portable and easier to handle for extended periods of time.

so are cell phones, which is what most people really use as far as portable goes. Tablets get used more often when sitting, not walking. plus i wouldn't call a 7 inch tab in your pocket as being comfortable and if its not comfortable its not that portable. so it gets dropped in a bag or purse just like a regular tablet...now were back to square one.
 

Eug

Lifer
Mar 11, 2000
24,051
1,682
126
7" wouldn't make for an enjoyable or lengthy book or magazine read. i can't imagine trying to read on anything smaller than my ipad for any length of time.
and clicking bunched up links on websites is hard enough on a 9.7" let alone anything smaller.
Luckily I don't read books or magazines on tablets. :p However, if I had to read a book on a tablet, I'd choose a 7" e-ink reader over a 10" iPad 3 any day.

so are cell phones, which is what most people really use as far as portable goes. Tablets get used more often when sitting, not walking. plus i wouldn't call a 7 inch tab in your pocket as being comfortable and if its not comfortable its not that portable. so it gets dropped in a bag or purse just like a regular tablet...now were back to square one.
A 10" tablet is a lot bigger, and heavier. I hate holding the thing for long periods, and I never carry mine around out of the house. I'd rather just take an 11" laptop.
 
Last edited:

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,484
8,345
126
7" wouldn't make for an enjoyable or lengthy book or magazine read. i can't imagine trying to read on anything smaller than my ipad for any length of time.
and clicking bunched up links on websites is hard enough on a 9.7" let alone anything smaller.

Yep, those 6" Kindles sure sold like crap and were too small for a lot of people.
 

Bateluer

Lifer
Jun 23, 2001
27,730
8
0
You guys, per the Prophet, you'll have to shave down your finger tips to use an iPad smaller than 10 inches. ;)
 

bearxor

Diamond Member
Jul 8, 2001
6,605
3
81
I still don't think the Android experience on a slate even holds a candle to iOS. So yes, I am interested. 7.8" is still pretty sizable. If it comes with the 32nm A5, I'd hold off until next year. Needs to be $299 or less.

They'll fly off the shelves. It's not like they have a problem moving the 10" versions @ $200 more.
 

HeXen

Diamond Member
Dec 13, 2009
7,835
37
91
Luckily I don't read books or magazines on tablets. :p However, if I had to read a book on a tablet, I'd choose a 7" e-ink reader over a 10" iPad 3 any day.
but you can do more on the ipad..plus it has nice resolution.

A 10" tablet is a lot bigger, and heavier. I hate holding the thing for long periods, and I never carry mine around out of the house. I'd rather just take an 11" laptop.

i'm a man, so i guess it doesn't bother me like it would a girl. though even girls should try to get their muscles into shape cause the ipad is pretty light.
 

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,484
8,345
126
could use the same argument and say the 3.5" screens sell real well and are no indication that the screen size is too small...

Not really. Kindle DX is 10" in size. Amazon doesn't release sales numbers but there's over 10x the number of reviews (30,000+ vs 3,000) for the smaller one vs the bigger one.

Price is obviously a factor, but the 6" size is apparently good enough to warrant a much larger purchase base.
 

Zaap

Diamond Member
Jun 12, 2008
7,162
424
126
I used to think I'd want a 7" iPad, but no longer. If it wouldn't be cheaper than the Nexus 7 tabs, then definitely not.
 

goog40

Diamond Member
Mar 16, 2000
4,198
1
0
At 7.85", it would still have ~33% larger screen area than the 7" 16:10 tablets.
 

Chocu1a

Golden Member
Jun 24, 2009
1,386
79
91
I own a 7" Acer tab100. great portable size. I plan ongetting a Nexus 7 after release. No way in hell I would give a dollar to Apple after blocking the sale of the Galaxy Nexus.
 

Eug

Lifer
Mar 11, 2000
24,051
1,682
126
but you can do more on the ipad..plus it has nice resolution.
I have an iPad already, and I'm not a huge fan of it, which is why I'm looking for a 7" tablet.

i'm a man, so i guess it doesn't bother me like it would a girl. though even girls should try to get their muscles into shape cause the ipad is pretty light.
A real man would carry around a 15" tablet.

modbook-pro.jpg
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
hmm a 7" ipad. yeah depends on price and specs.


i wouldn't pay more then $199 though