- Feb 4, 2003
- 3,370
- 0
- 71
Being 4:3 insteaed of 5:4, it would be a bit wider and a bit less tall than an equally sized 1280x1024 LCD, so it would be better for movies. All games that don't support 1280x1024 (there are quite a few) could run in native resolution. Having less pixels, it would probably be a bit cheaper than an equivelent 1280x1024 (or would it?). Non native 4:3 resultions would also probably look a bit better. Why have no manufacturers made a panel like this?