• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Would this kill my SSD quick ?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
I run 2 VMs on a SSD, so, yes, that is fine for them.
Disadvantages compared to what?
If you are worried about writes, then use a MLC SSD, and don't sweat it, just don't go crazy by writing 500GB/day and expect it to last the same as someone writing 50GB/day.
 
^

Buy good brands like Samsung and Intel and start using the thing. People seem to think they are fragile but I've found that the above two name brands are anything but.
 
How much writes can a hard drive take compared to a SSD ?

Quite a lot more if its an enterprise drive I think. I was told a long time back that enterprise drives were different and were more beefed up compared to ordinary consumer drives when I asked a rep why server drives were much more expensive. Theres an Intel writeup from 2008 which says enterprise drives are rated for high workloads and not rated for sitting idle most of the time.
http://download.intel.com/support/m...e_class_versus_desktop_class_hard_drives_.pdf
WD says its current Gold and RE server/datacenter drives are rated for 550Tb/year. SE is 180Tb/yr.

Even if consumer ssd's can last for a few hundred Terabytes of writes, the performance does decrease with its degraded state according the the data from the endurance testing from Techreport.

edit-

Seagate consumer desktop drives rated for 8x5 55tb/yr, NAS drives 7x24 180tb/yr.
http://www.seagate.com/as/en/products/desktop-storage/desktop-internal-drives/
 
Last edited:
^

Buy good brands like Samsung and Intel and start using the thing. People seem to think they are fragile but I've found that the above two name brands are anything but.

"A poor man can't afford a cheap suit."

So far, I have adhered to that recommendation: you can't afford to spend your money on crap.

We're also looking at M.2 and PCI-express SSDs, using bandwidth from the PCI-E bus. Not entirely very cheap at the moment.

I just took a chance on an ADATA SP550, and would've looked again at Samsung or Crucial but for the ADATA specs and other features. Taken with a grain of salt to be sure, the Egg customer reviews seemed encouraging. 480GB for about $110. No problems yet; the drive has been in the system for a couple months now. And that's about 25% of what I'd spent on a 500GB 840-Pro in early 2014.

And . . so far . . . it shows about 1.4TB of accumulated writes. Since this includes the cloning of a Win 7 OS and the installation of a Win 10 on a separate partition, and since the last time I looked at it two weeks ago when it was about 1.29TB, I could be writing more than 200GB/month. Suppose it's really double that; suppose I'm writing 5TB per annum. The drive will still be pre-adolescent after 5 years.
 
Back
Top