Would Raid 0 setup would be fastest?

[Mysteriouskk]

I have a couple of choices, and I currently do some video capture, so I do need something fast. I don't really care about backing things up, so if I lose the data; it doesn't really matter. Here are my choices:

- (3) 320 gb Drives in RAID 0 + (1) 320 gb as Primary (for windows)

- (2) 500gb drives in RAID 0 - windows is on raid 0 drive.

If I put windows on the RAID drives, will programs lose performance?

Update: sorry, meant to put this in the hardware forum.

 

[tfinch2]

HOT

 

[legoman666]

in for 12

 

[Glavinsolo]

Congratulations on changing your avatar

 

[sisq0kidd]

I'd go with the 500gb setup for pure speed. But get ready to be bent over if one drive crashes.

 

[Blain]

Mysteriouskk,
Why are you still beating this dead RAID 0 horse? :roll:

 

[Jiggz]

Originally posted by: Blain
Mysteriouskk,
Why are you still beating this dead RAID 0 horse? :roll:

AND JUST LIKE IN THE ABOVE LINK, YOU NEVER ONCE REPLIED TO POSTS BY OTHER MEMBERS, INSTEAD YOU STARTED ANOTHER STOOOPID THREAD OF THE SAME STOOOPID TOPIC. GET OVER IT AND GET A LIFE!