- Nov 5, 2010
- 938
- 0
- 0
he'd probably be like GHWB.
neither notably good or bad.
If Romney is the best this country can come up with, we are screwed, really really screwed.
He is certainly better than McCain or George W Bush.
Come on, at a minimum Romney is likely to be better than GWB and BHO. He's a smart guy who has been successful in business and in public service. On paper he's the best candidate we've had in a long time.
A poll of Romney supporters found 47% of them want another candidate other than Romney. HIS own supporters want someone else!!!
52.7% of Obama voters wanted someone else in the primaries in 2008.A poll of Romney supporters found 47% of them want another candidate other than Romney. HIS own supporters want someone else!!!
52.7% of Obama voters wanted someone else in the primaries in 2008.
it's a multi-candidate field. this isn't shocking stuff.
When you come up with a poll showing Obama's 2008 supporters wanted someone else during the primaries, then you'll actually have a valid point.
The issue really is the Congress. If the democrats controlled congress a Romney presidency might be okay since he's not much of a partisan and he would work with them.
At the same time, I do not see him confronting the idiot wing of the Republican party. He will never have a "sister soulja" moment IMO. Since there is a good chance that Republicans will gain seats in 2012, Romney would likely be a disastrous presidency.
If you liked Bush, you'll love Romney. Least he's not singing 'Bomb Bomb Bomb, Bomb Bomb Iran' like the last bozo. He'll do it though, and then he'll park our troops in the streets of major Iranian cities so they can die by the thousands the way Bush did in Iraq.
it seems like a safe assumption, given that he only won 47.3% of the popular vote in the primaries (so presumably, 52.7% of his general election supporters wanted someone else but still showed up to vote for their team anyways when it mattered)