• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

Would Jesus do the shocker?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

FleshLight

Diamond Member
Mar 18, 2004
6,883
0
71
Originally posted by: Cerb
Originally posted by: ironcrotch
didn't he create the shocker?!?!?!?!
No. It is older than Jesus, though the sexual connotation is much newer.

Actually the sexual connotation was derived from one of the techniques used in the Egyption embalming process.
 

ATLien247

Diamond Member
Feb 1, 2000
4,597
0
0
Originally posted by: FleshLight
Originally posted by: Cerb
Originally posted by: ironcrotch
didn't he create the shocker?!?!?!?!
No. It is older than Jesus, though the sexual connotation is much newer.

Actually the sexual connotation was derived from one of the techniques used in the Egyption embalming process.

I don't even want to know!

No, wait... yes... yes I do.
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,584
984
126
Originally posted by: shilala
Originally posted by: FallenHero
Originally posted by: shilala
WWJS?
I'm thinkin Florence Henderson.

What about Paris Hilton?

He's Jesus, not Lil John.
That bitch is trailer trash in a shiny wrapper.

I'd still hit it. :D

And if you say you wouldn't hit it then you're either a liar or gay.
 

SagaLore

Elite Member
Dec 18, 2001
24,036
21
81
What's so shocking about the shocker? And why does it have such a stupid name?
 

geno

Lifer
Dec 26, 1999
25,074
4
0
Originally posted by: SagaLore
What's so shocking about the shocker? And why does it have such a stupid name?

Have one done to you, you'll see why it's so shocking
 
Dec 27, 2001
11,272
1
0
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
this is just wrong.

:|

The mods decide what is right and wrong on ATOT. The fact they've let this go this long tells you where their beliefs lie. I'm preparing my final post ever on ATOT as I am not comfortable any more contributing to a forum run in such a manner.
 

SagaLore

Elite Member
Dec 18, 2001
24,036
21
81
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
this is just wrong.

:|

Just curious but if the OP had just started the thread about the "shocker" and not mentioned anything about Jesus, would your reply have been more like "that is so good. ;)"
 

KarenMarie

Elite Member
Sep 20, 2003
14,372
6
81
Originally posted by: SagaLore
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
this is just wrong.

:|

Just curious but if the OP had just started the thread about the "shocker" and not mentioned anything about Jesus, would your reply have been more like "that is so good. ;)"

I think the whole shocker thing is immature. The fact that it is about Jesus makes it, imho, offensive... as it would if it were about ANY religious leader or Mr. Rogers, Sesame Street character, or Princess Diana. But I am willing to bet that if it were about any of the others mentioned, it would have been locked.

Some things are just tasteless.

 

glugglug

Diamond Member
Jun 9, 2002
5,340
1
81
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
this is just wrong.

:|

The mods decide what is right and wrong on ATOT. The fact they've let this go this long tells you where their beliefs lie. I'm preparing my final post ever on ATOT as I am not comfortable any more contributing to a forum run in such a manner.


Woohoo!
 

SagaLore

Elite Member
Dec 18, 2001
24,036
21
81
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
Originally posted by: SagaLore
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
this is just wrong.

:|

Just curious but if the OP had just started the thread about the "shocker" and not mentioned anything about Jesus, would your reply have been more like "that is so good. ;)"

I think the whole shocker thing is immature. The fact that it is about Jesus makes it, imho, offensive... as it would if it were about ANY religious leader or Mr. Rogers, Sesame Street character, or Princess Diana. But I am willing to bet that if it were about any of the others mentioned, it would have been locked.

Some things are just tasteless.

Yes I agree that the OP started an immature and tasteless thread.

And I don't personally get this "shocker" gesture. There are much better ways to pleasure your wife's/girlfriend's anus than with a pinky. ;)
 

KarenMarie

Elite Member
Sep 20, 2003
14,372
6
81
Originally posted by: SagaLore

Yes I agree that the OP started an immature and tasteless thread.

And I don't personally get this "shocker" gesture. There are much better ways to pleasure your wife's/girlfriend's anus than with a pinky. ;)

While the shocker thing is immature, and someone starting a thread about it shows the level of contribution... my point is this...

If it were an anti-gay thread, an anti-muslim thread, anything remotely offensive to any other religion or race, it would be locked. But when threads are created to offend, belittle or poke fun at Christians, Jesus, or God... it is put down to 'differing opinions'.

I am not religious in any way, nor do I expect this thread to be locked. But just as the OP was voicing his opinion.. exercising his freedom of thought... I wanted to do the same and state that this is just wrong.

:)