Just doing it yourself with wirewrap may be possible but it would be quite difficult to get high speed busses to work like that.
Flat-out impossible for anything modern, for the same reason you can almost never use 2 layer PCBs.
Signal traces need to be kept REALLY close (thousandths of an inch) to a power or ground plane, such that when current flows one direction in the trace, it can complete the loop by flowing in the other direction in the plane. In real motherboards, this is done by stacking signal layers next to power or ground layers.
I wouldn't be surprised if the developement costs of a motherboard reach the mid six figures and then some.
It's not quite THAT bad.
If you do this, here is a quick hint: do not put 90 degree bends in the traces. do 2 45 degree ones.
Ooh! Let's have a holy war over this "rule"
🙂 The theory is that the trace is SLIGHTLY more capaciitive at the bend (since it's a little wider), and that the increased capacitance leads to an impedance discontinuity and thus a reflection. Frankly, I've never been convinced there's a noticeable impact or reflection here, even when you're looking with a TDR...
Sure. You'll need to buy all the parts, get all the non-disclosure agreements from the chip makers to get the documents to learn what you're supposed to do, come up with a schematic, layout and route it, and then have a professional production line manufacture it.
That's a little overly discouraging. The hard parts are getting the components and the BIOS. For Intel parts, at least, there're published reference schematics and routing rules that are available off
http://developer.intel.com once a part is launched. Professional board fab houses can be found in the back of every EE magazine there is.
If you seriously want to do these things, start a career in that direction. In about five to ten years you'll have learnt enough to get assigned your first mainboard project.
Hardly 5 to 10 years. I'm 5 years out of school, and on my third mainboard (I keep moving to more complex stuff; I'm doing DP servers and workstations now.)
Note: I do not want to sound discouraging at all - it's a rewarding path, and a really fine job with a perspective
Actually, I'm not sure how much future there is in heads-down mainboard design; there're a lot of people in a lot of different places (Asia) with those skills. The guys who're getting and staying employed now understand not only board design, but also big-picture systemwide stuff.
I second what others have said: Start small. If you want to toy around in your spare time, try figuring out something much simpler like a PCI I/O card, made from parts and using busses and ports whose specifications are public.
The one reason I miss ISA - as a junior, I had a PC interfacing class where we designed and wirewrapped an ISA printer interface card. That's the class where things finally started to click for me.
it's a set of about 3-courses to be able to design high speed i/o boards, and those require a few years worth of physics, materials and of course comp sci, comp E and EE courses.
Yep - EM Theory's actually REALLY important to understand high-speed PCB design.
My most recent mainboard design