- Sep 29, 2000
- 788
- 0
- 0
What do you think.
Would it be economically wise for MS to cause W2k to become odious (SP2) at the time of XP's arrival?
I would not consider XP if W2k would remains stable with upcoming software. Did want to try SP2 for some of the fixes, but rather live without, after hearing about the problems so far.
Personally I don't think this was planned, but it seems that to some, even goofs can be turned into profits.
Would it be economically wise for MS to cause W2k to become odious (SP2) at the time of XP's arrival?
I would not consider XP if W2k would remains stable with upcoming software. Did want to try SP2 for some of the fixes, but rather live without, after hearing about the problems so far.
Personally I don't think this was planned, but it seems that to some, even goofs can be turned into profits.
