Originally posted by: Ornery
Gee, you'd think a $300.00 camera would work just fine "for general pic taking", wouldn't you? I had the Canon S50, which had the exact same problem in low light. It could focus quickly, if there was enough light, but wouldn't lock focus in low light. I doubt the A70/A80 would fare any better.
My solution was to cough up more money for Sony's hologram autofocus system. That works 100%, everytime in low light, and even NO light at all. There may be other cameras that can do it with a different system, but I don't know which ones. I only know the one I got really does work. $455.00 for the DSC-V1 is about 50% more than you probably paid for the S330, but gets the job done "for general pic taking".
I can only speak for the S50. OUCH is right! Pissed me off that spending over $300.00 still wasn't enough. Well, I'll get over spending the extra money, but that low light shooting issue would have pissed me off for as long as we owned that camera.Originally posted by: screw3d
Originally posted by: Ornery
Gee, you'd think a $300.00 camera would work just fine "for general pic taking", wouldn't you? I had the Canon S50, which had the exact same problem in low light. It could focus quickly, if there was enough light, but wouldn't lock focus in low light. I doubt the A70/A80 would fare any better.
My solution was to cough up more money for Sony's hologram autofocus system. That works 100%, everytime in low light, and even NO light at all. There may be other cameras that can do it with a different system, but I don't know which ones. I only know the one I got really does work. $455.00 for the DSC-V1 is about 50% more than you probably paid for the S330, but gets the job done "for general pic taking".
Ouch!I am hoping that I would not spend more than $50 for a switch (A70).. the A70 is just as bad in low-light situations?
