Worst car ever made.

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
80,287
17,082
136
While doing some car shopping recently (I am not happy with my S-10) I also got into some online articles. After 6 hours of reading I was getting into stuff that really didnt help me but was still pretty entertaining. Found the following article online this morning. Was amazed no one else posted it. Thought about posting it in OT for lulz then realized it would quickly turn into P&N with flames and everything. So instead I submit it to you.


I've told you about the Nash Metropolitan that I once owned, but I've never told you about the REALLY bad car I once had. In 1980 I purchased the undoubtedly worst car to ever be towed out of Detroit...a brand spankin' new Pontiac Sunbird. The name, Sunbird, evokes images of being a free spirit, hitting the road for the beach and having the time of your life. In reality this car would familiarize you with being a free spirited hitchhiker because car parts would usually hit the road. Little did I know that, in fact, "Sunbird" was synonymous with "Buzzard". You've heard of "Monday" cars? This thing must have been built on the first Monday after the Christmas shutdown.

While it was under warranty I took it in to the dealer because the driver side door squeaked incessantly. It was late in the day when I got to the dealer and the service manager looked at it while I was standing there. He opened the door, examined it, placed his knee against the door and pulled the window frame out away from the car. I asked if that was the normal procedure for fixing doors and he replied, "We usually take it around back so the customer can't see us do it."
One day when I was sixty miles from home, the clutch pedal dropped to the floor. This is a lot of fun when you are in heavy traffic. The car had 28,000 miles on it at the time so it wasn't covered under warranty. I drove the car home doing a clutchless double-clutch, feathering the gas while shifting gears.

I can only begin to tell you all the things that went wrong with this car. For instance, it had a major electrical problems that resulted in 14 burned out headlights, four or five alternators, and a couple of starters. It ate tires. A set of tires might have lasted fifteen thousand miles. The transmission was quite problematic with the throw-out bearing passing through the pressure plate on a couple of occasions.
One day I stopped at the post office to drop off some mail. I returned to my car and cranked it up. The funny thing was, it wouldn't stop cranking. I turned the key off but the starter kept starting. The only "tool" I had in the car was a butter knife that was in the back floorboard. I jumped out and opened the hood (the interior hood release cable was broken, so I had rigged up a front latch). The starter was cranking itself to death so the only thing I could do was use the butter knife to pry the smoking hot ground cable off the battery. Of course I had done an excellent job of tightening the cable end, so it took about five minutes to get it off. That was fun.

I remember one time when the engine decided to die on thirty second intervals. There was some trash in the carburetor (fuel filters apparently cost too much for Detroit). All I can say is thank God for lack of a safety switch on the clutch pedal. You know how you have to press the clutch in to crank a manual transmission these days? This car didn't have one, thus I was able to drive it home using the starter motor to supplement the gas starved engine.
This car had "Radial Tuned Suspension". Woohoo! That meant you could hear the suspension play a tune as it ate the tires off the car. It didn't matter how many times you had the front end aligned, it would still eat the tires. Once I decided to put bias ply tires on it since they were considerably cheaper. They turned out to be a mere snack for the Sunbird.
When the car had less than 60,000 miles on it, the clutch failed again. The guy that fixed it told me that the rear main bearing cap was broken. This was probably why it had a tendency to leak oil out the rear seal. I didn't want to pay the money to fix the engine, so we left it that way. Needless to say I was changing the clutch in about 15,000 more miles due to slippage. This time I changed it myself.

Since being mechanically challenged wasn't enough for this car, brother-in-law Jim gave it some real personality by ripping the front fender open with his truck bumper. You know how you say "adiós" or "aloha" or "goodbye" when people leave? Way back in 1973 I learned to tell Jim "Watch out for my car!" whenever he left. Jim's a farmer and on a farm there is nothing behind you. There actually is, but nothing that an extremely large truck bumper won't mow down. I was at my sister's house one day and Jim was leaving so I said, "Watch out for my car!" as he walked out the door. A few minutes later he was back in the house explaining that he had backed into my car. It appeared that someone had taken an industrial sized can opener and went to town on the front left fender of the Sunbird. I never got it fixed so it would better deter thieves from stealing it. The reason I didn't want anyone stealing it was the liability if they got hurt.
I kept the car until it had about 78,000 miles on it. I can't imagine owning a car today that was such a piece of junk. I usually get some kind of strange attachment to cars and get the feeling that they actually have a soul or something. Needless to say it never happened with the Sunbird. I traded the Sunbird for a Subaru Justy RS 4WD. I was at the hardware store not long after the trade-in when I saw the Sunbird once again (easy to recognize with the torn open front fender) with a vanity license plate that read "CYNDY". When I was in the store at the check-out line, a teenage girl wearing a name tag with "CYNDY" written on it was at the cash register. I felt horrible. I wanted to tell her about the car, but I knew I couldn't. I should have scrapped that car for the sake of humanity.

We've had numerous other cars that have been so much better quality. A Subaru wagon with 176,000 miles on it. A Subaru Impreza with over 250,000 miles. A Ford truck with 330,000 miles on it. A Scion with 79,000 miles on it and it's never required anything other than regular maintenance. Whenever I think of General Motor's problems today and the billions in bailout money they need, I think about that Sunbird. I think about how broke I was at the time and how GM got $9,000 for a worthless piece of shit car.
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,600
1,005
126
This car had "Radial Tuned Suspension". Woohoo! That meant you could hear the suspension play a tune as it ate the tires off the car. It didn't matter how many times you had the front end aligned, it would still eat the tires. Once I decided to put bias ply tires on it since they were considerably cheaper. They turned out to be a mere snack for the Sunbird.

:laugh:MAO!!!

My Brother-In-Law had one of these cars for a couple years and yes, it was a colossal piece of shit.
 

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,576
126
My brother had the Olds version, a Starfire...

It was a lot of trouble.
 

DVad3r

Diamond Member
Jan 3, 2005
5,340
3
81
LOL I died reading that :)

When we came to Canada my dad's first car was

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plymouth_Reliant

All I remember as a kid was sitting in the drivers seat of that car a few days later while my whole family was pushing the thing back home, lulz. That car was so bad...

It was everything but, reliant.
 

desy

Diamond Member
Jan 13, 2000
5,447
216
106
My brother had one of those wasn't a bad car actually but it never had a long life
Cut short by a light standard
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chrysler_Neon

"Among these, the Neon performed the worst. IIHS stated that the Neon had ?...major problems beginning with its structure. This car is a disaster...The structure is poor...If this had been a real driver in a real crash, it?s likely it wouldn?t have been survivable...if safety is a priority, the Neon is a small car to be avoided.?

ROFL. What a piece.
 

chucky2

Lifer
Dec 9, 1999
10,018
37
91
"They turned out to be a mere snack for the Sunbird."

LMAO...I don't know why, but I found that to be the funniest part of that whole post...

Chuck
 

DVad3r

Diamond Member
Jan 3, 2005
5,340
3
81
Originally posted by: chucky2
"They turned out to be a mere snack for the Sunbird."

LMAO...I don't know why, but I found that to be the funniest part of that whole post...

Chuck

LOL yea man, I started dying at work when I read that, ppl were looking at me like "WTF is going on"
 

LOUISSSSS

Diamond Member
Dec 5, 2005
8,771
58
91
LOL @ the "watch out for my car" part

anyway... just one of the few [many?] failures out of detroit.
 
Mar 10, 2005
14,647
2
0
Originally posted by: chucky2
"They turned out to be a mere snack for the Sunbird."

LMAO...I don't know why, but I found that to be the funniest part of that whole post...

Chuck
this was good too
"The reason I didn't want anyone stealing it was the liability if they got hurt."
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
Aries K....I have an actual event where my really rich friend's dad was forced to accept on of these POS for an LA to Las Vegas jaunt as the rental company didn't have any other cars (his first choosing a car online actually).
died mid stream to Vegas. He left it there and had a HELICOPTER come get him.

He left it with everything open.

They actually tried to sue him.
 

IcePickFreak

Platinum Member
Jul 12, 2007
2,428
9
81
He could of stopped at 1980, most everything was junk. Miles of vacuum lines under the hood and all it took was a year or two before one cracked and you had a vacuum leak. Considering over half the stuff on the car either ran off or was signaled by vacuum you would have big problems.
 

Demon-Xanth

Lifer
Feb 15, 2000
20,551
2
81
Originally posted by: IcePickFreak
He could of stopped at 1980, most everything was junk. Miles of vacuum lines under the hood and all it took was a year or two before one cracked and you had a vacuum leak. Considering over half the stuff on the car either ran off or was signaled by vacuum you would have big problems.

Very true, the "carb to EFI transition era" was a time when the tech wasn't there to make EFI work well and the emissions regulations wouldn't allow carburetors to work well. So regardless of what you got or where you got it, it was unreliable, complex junk with expensive parts that was just an old engine patched up or a "new thing" that didn't have the bugs worked out yet. When the 90's rolled around, the tech for EFI was coming into maturity well and everything started being a hell of a lot more reliable.
 

Pacfanweb

Lifer
Jan 2, 2000
13,158
59
91
Everything Chrysler built during that period sucked. Pretty much the same for Ford, too. GM's were actually the best of the three, but that wasn't saying much.

There really weren't any super-reliable cars built in the early-to-mid-80's. Not like today, anyway.

Cars are the best they have ever been today, and it's really not even close. You have cars going over 200k and more on a regular basis. That hardly ever happened in the "good old days", regardless of what our parents and grandparents like to tell us. 50's, 60's and 70's cars simply did not last as long as cars do now, not without spending a LOT more (adjusted for inflation, obviously) to keep them running.

The automobile has come a long, long way.