Worlds largest Oil Reserve...... in Canada?

Googer

Lifer
Nov 11, 2004
12,576
7
81
Link



There was a big acquisition announced today [subscription required] in the world of oil and gas, as Marathon Oil Corp (NYSE: MRO) is picking up Canada's Western Oil Sands Inc. for $5.56 billion plus assumed debt of $650 million.

The deal is going to give Marathon Oil a huge presence in one of the world's largest crude oil reservoirs, the Athabasca Oil Sands Project. The deal, which is scheduled to finalize during the fourth quarter of this yea,r is going to give Marathon control over 300,000 gross acres of oil sands.

There are lots of hopes riding on the future of oil coming out of the Canadian oil sands. While the cost of getting that oil out of the ground is much higher than the cost of normal oil exploration, there are several reasons why it is being viewed as very profitable. The primary reason is the close proximity that the area has to America, which is after all, the world's largest consumer. Being the closest supplier to the world's largest consumer of oil puts companies in Canada in a very enviable position.

Another reason why investors are pouring money into the Canadian oil sands is the ever present threat of instability in the Middle East. With all of the instability that surrounds the Middle East, one can never be sure if the supplies going West will be interrupted.

The area is currently producing 1.2 million barrels a day, but expectations are far higher for the higher. Analysts are estimating that the area is going to be pumping out 3.7 million barrels a day by 2020.

The company's acquisition plan was not the only item in the news today for Marathon. The company also posted second quarter earnings this morning of $2.25 per share which beat analysts' estimates of $2.12.

Michael Fowlkes has worked as a stock trader for seven years and spent the last two years working as an analyst for the online investment advisory service Investor's Observer.


 

iamwiz82

Lifer
Jan 10, 2001
30,772
13
81
The area is currently producing 1.2 million barrels a day, but expectations are far higher for the higher. Analysts are estimating that the area is going to be pumping out 3.7 million barrels a day by 2020.

Wait, I thought peak oil was this year? :confused:
 

NanoStuff

Banned
Mar 23, 2006
2,981
1
0
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
The area is currently producing 1.2 million barrels a day, but expectations are far higher for the higher. Analysts are estimating that the area is going to be pumping out 3.7 million barrels a day by 2020.

Wait, I thought peak oil was this year? :confused:

That's likely. 3.7 million barrels a day isn't nearly enough to offset traditional sources.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,392
8,549
126
bah, there is more oil stuck in oil shale under colorado and wyoming than has been produced in the history of the world.

World deposits of oil shale are estimated to equal 2.9?3.3 trillion barrels of recoverable oil, 1.5?2.6 trillion barrels of which are in the United States.

the oil sands, by comparison, are estimated at 166 billion barrels. total proven, recoverable reserves (including the sands) are about 1.266 trillion barrels. total production has been about 930 billion barrels.
 

iamwiz82

Lifer
Jan 10, 2001
30,772
13
81
Originally posted by: NanoStuff
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
The area is currently producing 1.2 million barrels a day, but expectations are far higher for the higher. Analysts are estimating that the area is going to be pumping out 3.7 million barrels a day by 2020.

Wait, I thought peak oil was this year? :confused:

That's likely. 3.7 million barrels a day isn't nearly enough to offset traditional sources.

It will certainly help. All of OPEC only supplies the US with 5.5 million barrels per day. Remember that this isn't Canada's only oil field.
 

CPA

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
30,322
4
0
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
NOW the talk of merging North America into a single country makes sense.

I would consider it an acquisition more than a merger. :D
 

LS20

Banned
Jan 22, 2002
5,858
0
0
Originally posted by: amddude
We should also plunder their maple syrup

great idea. at the moment, grade A maple is 50x price of crude oil per volume
 

PricklyPete

Lifer
Sep 17, 2002
14,582
162
106
Originally posted by: LS20
Originally posted by: amddude
We should also plunder their maple syrup

great idea. at the moment, grade A maple is 50x price of crude oil per volume

Let the government know...they may subsidize it in hopes it will become an alternative fuel!
 

Scouzer

Lifer
Jun 3, 2001
10,358
5
0
And before anyone says it: These operations have been profitable since $15/barrel. Yes they are feasible for the long haul and a legitimate source of oil alongside traditional sources.
 

Xavier434

Lifer
Oct 14, 2002
10,373
1
0
Hmm this is pretty cool. It is possible that prices will go down if this happens due to competition.

btw, the topic summary made me lol :laugh:
 

TruePaige

Diamond Member
Oct 22, 2006
9,874
2
0
Canada = weed, eighteen year old drinking, maple syrup and awesomeness.

Let them acquire us! =D
 

LegendKiller

Lifer
Mar 5, 2001
18,256
68
86
The biggest problem is that in order to liquify and extract the oil it needs to be pumped full of steam and then processed a few times to get the sand and other stuff out. This is extremely water intensive and produces a lot of nasty crap afterwards, which drains local streams and creates a lot of crap that goes back into them. Naturally future processes will become much more efficient.

If it can be perfected we will never need the ME again.
 

Googer

Lifer
Nov 11, 2004
12,576
7
81
Originally posted by: TruePaige
Canada = weed, eighteen year old drinking, maple syrup and awesomeness.

Let them acquire us! =D

If you think it's so great, then emigrate to Canada. Don't bring it here.
 

Googer

Lifer
Nov 11, 2004
12,576
7
81
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: Googer
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
NOW the talk of merging North America into a single country makes sense.

Negative.

Yes huh!

I'd be willing to bet most of you whom say this are opposed to the Iraq War and say it's for oil. But it'd beg to differ.


I am not willing to give up my sovereignty and freedoms to a foreign government. It's counter-constitutional and any senator or congressman whom supports such should be tried for treason for not upholding and defending our existing union. Such hypocrites.
 

manowar821

Diamond Member
Mar 1, 2007
6,063
0
0
Originally posted by: Googer
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: Googer
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
NOW the talk of merging North America into a single country makes sense.

Negative.

Yes huh!

I'd be willing to bet most of you whom say this are opposed to the Iraq War and say it's for oil. But it'd beg to differ.


I am not willing to give up my sovereignty and freedoms to a foreign government. It's counter-constitutional and any senator or congressman whom supports such should be tried for treason for not upholding and defending our existing union. Such hypocrites.

From your previous posts, you sound like a good in-line nationalist.

FYI, I appose a North American Union, as well.
 

Nocturnal

Lifer
Jan 8, 2002
18,927
0
76
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
NOW the talk of merging North America into a single country makes sense.

The North American Union isn't merging the actual countries.