World War Z The Surprise Hit of the Year??

wangel00

Banned
Jul 22, 2013
2
0
0
After 3 weeks at the box office it has made 370 Million Worldwide… with 150 Domestic (seems like 200 is very reachable)

Over 500 Million Worldwide is a lock at this point but how far can it go? IMO it will close its run with 580 million… I

Considering this was looking like one of the biggest flops of the year, with some websites prediction a gross of less then 250 million worldwide, and less then 100 domestic…it is doing very well… with rentals, sales and streaming rights it will add a huge profit… and a sequel is already in the works..

It seems like Johnny Depp has taken the Bullet that Brad Pitt dodged…Lone Ranger is tanking hard in the us.

Is anyone suprised at this?? Personally I thought it would be this years John Carter/Battleship


_____________________________________________
Faux spam sig deleted.
admin allisolm
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Wreckem

Diamond Member
Sep 23, 2006
9,541
1,106
126
It needs $500million worldwide to break even. That is why everyone said it was a flop.
 

Eug

Lifer
Mar 11, 2000
24,053
1,685
126
I was convinced Lone Ranger would flop, but I thought WWZ would too. It wasn't necessarily an either/or scenario.
 

GagHalfrunt

Lifer
Apr 19, 2001
25,284
1,997
126
Given that The Walking Dead set a bunch of cable ratings records it's not too hard to see why WWZ is kicking ass at the box office. Zombies are hot right now.
 

ProchargeMe

Senior member
Jun 2, 2012
679
0
0
I haven't seen it, but I will once it hits shelves. I thought superman was the hit movie this summer? I heard it was doing well, around 600+ million I believe?
 

AKACyrano

Junior Member
Jul 30, 2009
14
0
66
Other than zombies, which were to quick, it shared little with the book. Was still an enteraining flik none the less.
 

Fritzo

Lifer
Jan 3, 2001
41,920
2,161
126
After 3 weeks at the box office it has made 370 Million Worldwide… with 150 Domestic (seems like 200 is very reachable)

Over 500 Million Worldwide is a lock at this point but how far can it go? IMO it will close its run with 580 million… I

Considering this was looking like one of the biggest flops of the year, with some websites prediction a gross of less then 250 million worldwide, and less then 100 domestic…it is doing very well… with rentals, sales and streaming rights it will add a huge profit… and a sequel is already in the works..

It seems like Johnny Depp has taken the Bullet that Brad Pitt dodged…Lone Ranger is tanking hard in the us.

Is anyone suprised at this?? Personally I thought it would be this years John Carter/Battleship


_____________________________________________


Everyone on ATOT thinks every movie will flop.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Fingolfin269

Lifer
Feb 28, 2003
17,948
34
91
It needs $500million worldwide to break even. That is why everyone said it was a flop.

Wow. I know we're talking 10-15 years ago but I believe the Lord of the Rings trilogy didn't even require that much across all three to break even.
 

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,133
38
91
It needs $500million worldwide to break even. That is why everyone said it was a flop.

Why would it need $500m to break even? Was the cost and distribution that expensive? Wouldn't that make it the most expensive movie in history?
 

Wreckem

Diamond Member
Sep 23, 2006
9,541
1,106
126
Why would it need $500m to break even? Was the cost and distribution that expensive? Wouldn't that make it the most expensive movie in history?

Production was allegedly over $200million. Advertising was over $100million. It had over $300million in costs. Gross = costs doesn't does not equal break even.
 
Last edited:

Fingolfin269

Lifer
Feb 28, 2003
17,948
34
91
Production was over $200million. Advertising was over $100million. It had over $300million in costs. Gross = costs doesn't does not equal break even.

so just throw an extra couple of hundred mil in there in a break even analysis and call it a day?
 

velillen

Platinum Member
Jul 12, 2006
2,120
1
81
Why would it need $500m to break even? Was the cost and distribution that expensive? Wouldn't that make it the most expensive movie in history?

I dont know the actual break downs but you have a lot going into that 500 million. Theres paying actor, film production, cgi, and well all the stuff you normally think of. Then there is advertising (huge), on tv, films, ect which can be quite expensive as well. Then like you said you have distribution which shouldnt be all that much for the theaters.

Im sure it had a high overhead just on the film portion. If spider man 2 cost 200million just for the film im sure this was up there too
 

Meghan54

Lifer
Oct 18, 2009
11,684
5,227
136
After 3 weeks at the box office it has made 370 Million Worldwide… with 150 Domestic (seems like 200 is very reachable)


I'm confused. Everywhere I see WWZ was released June 21, which gives it 5 weekends in theatres, or 5 weeks, not 3, and entering its 6th week.

And I think WWZ is almost out of steam as it only took in $5.2M this past weekend.

I also think everyone is missing the real hit that's out there right now, although most here won't bother even acknowledging its existence---Despicable Me 2. Since its July 3 release date, it's had over $275M in domestic box office and almost $475M globally, beating everything so far except Man of Steel, which has had $285M domestically....but really almost out of legs as MoS only garnered $1.8M this past weekend while DM2 garnered $25.1M.
 
Last edited:

Wreckem

Diamond Member
Sep 23, 2006
9,541
1,106
126
so just throw an extra couple of hundred mil in there in a break even analysis and call it a day?

No. The production company/studio who spent all the money doesn't get anywhere near all the gross. The distributors get their cut off the top. Then you have the theaters which their cut is typically a sliding scale that goes up each week. The $500million is the number that was thrown around by industry analysts. In any even the movie will be profitable. Not nearly as profitable as some other movies this year. And way better than the flops. Some of the flops had epic write downs in the $150-200million range.

WWZ just isnt a good movie though. No one I've talked to actually liked it.
 
Last edited:

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,560
6,393
126
lol wow so many of you got baited by this spammer with his fake sig caked into his first post.
 

dud

Diamond Member
Feb 18, 2001
7,635
73
91
How much does a "regular", i.e. non-matinee ticket cost these days?

How much would you be willing to pay to see one of these movies? I ask because I agree and hope that the zombie gravy train is near an end. All are variations on a theme ...
 

Jadow

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2003
5,962
2
0
Production was allegedly over $200million. Advertising was over $100million. It had over $300million in costs. Gross = costs doesn't does not equal break even.

they split the gross with the theaters about 50/50 in the US, and overseas, the studios gets less than 50%.

They need to make about 5x costs to break even.
 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
How much does a "regular", i.e. non-matinee ticket cost these days?

How much would you be willing to pay to see one of these movies? I ask because I agree and hope that the zombie gravy train is near an end. All are variations on a theme ...

they're monster movies, though, what do you really expect?

I'm sure eventually we'll recycle back through werewolves, mummies, frankenstein, and back to vampires again.
 

MontyAC

Diamond Member
Feb 28, 2004
4,112
1
81
Everyone wants to see anything with zombies. Have they decided to make a sequel?