Woohoo, One Down, Two To Go!

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Now that the mandate is clear for the next four years, what are your thoughts on the continuing war on terror?
 

alchemize

Lifer
Mar 24, 2000
11,486
0
0
Can you add "sanctions followed by pre-emption if sanctions fail"?

I see diplomacy as worthless if there is no muscle behind it.
 

Darkhawk28

Diamond Member
Dec 22, 2000
6,759
0
0
Militarily, we can't do squat. Economically, we can't do squat. Because of the state of the morale in this country, we can't do squat. We've laid our hands on the table, came up with a pair of deuces against a full house.
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
I can't imagine us actually invading North Korea pre-emptivly. They would put up a much harder fight than Iraq, and let's face it, tens of thousands of military deaths to prevent something that might never happen is NOT going to go over well.
 

alchemize

Lifer
Mar 24, 2000
11,486
0
0
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Militarily, we can't do squat. Economically, we can't do squat. Because of the state of the morale in this country, we can't do squat. We've laid our hands on the table, came up with a pair of deuces against a full house.
Not all military options involve invading and nation building, ya know. How many carrier groups are being utilized in Iraq versus are available for other duty? Strategic bombers? Cruise missles etc.?
 

Darkhawk28

Diamond Member
Dec 22, 2000
6,759
0
0
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Militarily, we can't do squat. Economically, we can't do squat. Because of the state of the morale in this country, we can't do squat. We've laid our hands on the table, came up with a pair of deuces against a full house.
Not all military options involve invading and nation building, ya know. How many carrier groups are being utilized in Iraq versus are available for other duty? Strategic bombers? Cruise missles etc.?

True, but we could've done that with Iraq...
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,267
126
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Militarily, we can't do squat. Economically, we can't do squat. Because of the state of the morale in this country, we can't do squat. We've laid our hands on the table, came up with a pair of deuces against a full house.
Not all military options involve invading and nation building, ya know. How many carrier groups are being utilized in Iraq versus are available for other duty? Strategic bombers? Cruise missles etc.?

True, but we could've done that with Iraq...

TaDa!
 

Aimster

Lifer
Jan 5, 2003
16,129
2
0
They'll stike you right back if you hit them from air or cruise missles. North Korea will destroy South Korea and Iran will cause thousands of deaths in Israel and attack U.S bases around the gulf.

Iraq = easy
afghanistan = world war 2 weapons. a joke.
 

klah

Diamond Member
Aug 13, 2002
7,070
1
0
There will be no sanctions on Iran for the same reason none have been implemented against Sudan for their ongoing genocide; China won't allow it.