wonder should we take 'graphics' out of VC&G to draw a finer line for 'Peripherals'

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ken g6

Programming Moderator, Elite Member
Moderator
Dec 11, 1999
16,700
4,661
75
I've never been sure either. But maybe a rearrangement would be better? "Video and Graphics Cards"? "Video/Graphics Cards"?
 
Dec 30, 2004
12,553
2
76
I've never been sure either. But maybe a rearrangement would be better? "Video and Graphics Cards"? "Video/Graphics Cards"?

the word video is redundant considering the adjective 'graphics'

that said, given G/FreeSync, it wouldn't make sense to enforce the divide. IMO. Rather, I'd LIKE to see monitor stuff in the GPU section. Talk about 10-bit colors, what's good for 1440p, which supports FreeSync, etc. etc. They've always gone together IMO. Mainly, the important thing is to keep stuff visible. Splitting it up too much means people don't see stuff. I completely stopped going to GenHard after CPUs and Overclocking was split off from it. See, I won't have much interest in VISITING Peripherals except if I were considering upgrading, but I like being aware of it. Having displays as part of VC&G ensures that happens.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.