Woman Sues Over Ticket for Anti-Bush Bumper Sticker

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

palehorse

Lifer
Dec 21, 2005
11,521
0
76
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
This is the same Dekalb County that locked me up for Distributed Computing as they said it cost 59 cents a second for 1/2 a floppy of data. They wanted me in jail for 125 years (7 Felony counts) and $815,000 in fines and restitution.
now THAT is a story I'd like to hear!
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Originally posted by: palehorse74
YAYYY for frivolous lawsuits!!

bah... f'n ACLU.... "emotional distress" my arse! what a total bunch of crock.

The ticket got thrown out, didnt it? well then she should be greatful that justice won out and STFU already with her whiny-assed BS lawsuit.

You're in a job that involves serving your country, right? And you're one of the biggest Bush supporters I've seen on here. So let me ask you this, do you think it's appropriate or in keeping with your duty if you let your personal political beliefs dictate how you do your job? I can't imagine you would. Like I said, I'm not a big fan of lawsuits, and this one in particular does not seem to involve a lot of pain and suffering, but I like to think of it in terms of punishing a system stupid enough to have cops like this.
 

imported_Lothar

Diamond Member
Aug 10, 2006
4,559
1
0
Like Rainsford said, this is one of the few frivolous lawsuit I actually support.
Teach them a lesson while at it.
 

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
Maybe someone should get a bumper sticker with pictures of people in white hoods on them and some totally crazy slogan about hanging black people or something else totally offensive and see how the ACLU and the left reacts to that.

Where do we draw the line on what people can and can?t say in public? ?Impeach Bush? bumpers stickers, sure why not. But ?I?m tired of all the BuShit? is inappropriate just because of the use of the word ?******? in it. Clever yes, acceptable in public no. How many of us would want to explain that bumper sticker to a 5 year old.

Her suing just shows that she is some off the wall leftist trying to make a statement and nothing else.
 

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Maybe someone should get a bumper sticker with pictures of people in white hoods on them and some totally crazy slogan about hanging black people or something else totally offensive and see how the ACLU and the left reacts to that.

Where do we draw the line on what people can and can?t say in public? ?Impeach Bush? bumpers stickers, sure why not. But ?I?m tired of all the BuShit? is inappropriate just because of the use of the word ?******? in it. Clever yes, acceptable in public no. How many of us would want to explain that bumper sticker to a 5 year old.

Her suing just shows that she is some off the wall leftist trying to make a statement and nothing else.
That statement, of course, being that in spite of people like that cop, she still has a United States Constitution First Amendment right to freedom of speech, specifically freedom of political speech. It's a lesson that too many of the Bush zealots seem to have forgotten. Will some people find it offensive? Sure. Too bad. If you never encounter anything in your community that offends you, you're not living in a truly free society.
 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Maybe someone should get a bumper sticker with pictures of people in white hoods on them and some totally crazy slogan about hanging black people or something else totally offensive and see how the ACLU and the left reacts to that.

Where do we draw the line on what people can and can?t say in public? ?Impeach Bush? bumpers stickers, sure why not. But ?I?m tired of all the BuShit? is inappropriate just because of the use of the word ?******? in it. Clever yes, acceptable in public no. How many of us would want to explain that bumper sticker to a 5 year old.

Her suing just shows that she is some off the wall leftist trying to make a statement and nothing else.

I don't care what's on your bumper, but you better damned well not get a traffic ticket over it.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
349
126
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Maybe someone should get a bumper sticker with pictures of people in white hoods on them and some totally crazy slogan about hanging black people or something else totally offensive and see how the ACLU and the left reacts to that.

Maybe have some actual KKK members try to march right through a Jewish neighborhood, and see how the ACLU handles *that*.

Oh, that's right, we did see how they handled it - they fought for the marchers, and lost a lot of their Jewish contributors.

Where do we draw the line on what people can and can?t say in public? ?Impeach Bush? bumpers stickers, sure why not. But ?I?m tired of all the BuShit? is inappropriate just because of the use of the word ?******? in it. Clever yes, acceptable in public no. How many of us would want to explain that bumper sticker to a 5 year old.

Her suing just shows that she is some off the wall leftist trying to make a statement and nothing else.

Funny, but not surprisingly, you and the courts disagree since the statue was apparently already ruled to violate free speech.

I find the bumper sticker in poor taste; I don't want it on my car, despite my view that the Bush administration is a criminal danger to our nation. However, unlike some, I don't equate what I find in bad taste with what the state should use its police powers to suppress. I support her right to that sticker. The rights of adults to express themselves are not drawn at the point of what it's nice to explain to 5 year olds.

So, where do we draw the line? You could have a big 10 foot sign driven down the street with the f word, and profanities blaring from a loudspeaker.

I'd have to think about where to split the hair. I've actually thought about what the law should be regarding a guy reading an adult magazine on the subway (splitting the hair?)

I'm still considering the topic, but I'd put the line well more liberal than you. But this isn't about that issue; that issue is settled in the law for this situation.

This is about a cop violating his authority by issuing a ticket for a non-criminal matter.

One loudmouth above (not John) posts how because she was found not guilty she should be glad.

I'd like to see him given a ticket for a pro-Bush bumper sticker by a liberal cop who thought any pro-Bush message is offensive, have him go to court, and not complain.
 

senseamp

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
Cops think they can infringe on people's rights and simply get away with it? I hope she wins.
 

lamborghini

Junior Member
Jun 27, 2006
12
0
0
Originally posted by: senseamp
Cops think they can infringe on people's rights and simply get away with it? I hope she wins.

So do I. Let's make this country a police state.
 

jackschmittusa

Diamond Member
Apr 16, 2003
5,972
1
0
Cops are among the public servants that should be made to pay a price for abusing their authority. I have been to DeKalb county too, and I doubt his superiors would do anything on their own, and would allow it to happen again. Perhaps this woman's actions will make the county safe for bumper stickers (and freedom of speech) again.

Those of you that blow this off as inconsequential have no appreation of the freedoms you have, and therefore should not even be considered to have anything worthy to contribute. If you do not understand the subject matter, just quietly observe and learn.
 

BlancoNino

Diamond Member
Oct 31, 2005
5,695
0
0
I thought it was illegal to have a bumper sticker w/ the word Sh*t on it. If not, throw the ticket out. Emotional distress = excuse for big money. In the end, the lawyers and the plaintiff win while everyone else loses.
 

AutumnRayne

Member
Sep 3, 2003
94
0
0
Originally posted by: Craig234


Funny, but not surprisingly, you and the courts disagree since the statue was apparently already ruled to violate free speech.

I find the bumper sticker in poor taste; I don't want it on my car, despite my view that the Bush administration is a criminal danger to our nation. However, unlike some, I don't equate what I find in bad taste with what the state should use its police powers to suppress. I support her right to that sticker. The rights of adults to express themselves are not drawn at the point of what it's nice to explain to 5 year olds.

So, where do we draw the line? You could have a big 10 foot sign driven down the street with the f word, and profanities blaring from a loudspeaker.

I'd have to think about where to split the hair. I've actually thought about what the law should be regarding a guy reading an adult magazine on the subway (splitting the hair?)

I'm still considering the topic, but I'd put the line well more liberal than you. But this isn't about that issue; that issue is settled in the law for this situation.

This is about a cop violating his authority by issuing a ticket for a non-criminal matter.

One loudmouth above (not John) posts how because she was found not guilty she should be glad.

I'd like to see him given a ticket for a pro-Bush bumper sticker by a liberal cop who thought any pro-Bush message is offensive, have him go to court, and not complain.





QFT! Well said Craig. :thumbsup:

 

ericlp

Diamond Member
Dec 24, 2000
6,134
223
106
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Maybe someone should get a bumper sticker with pictures of people in white hoods on them and some totally crazy slogan about hanging black people or something else totally offensive and see how the ACLU and the left reacts to that.

Where do we draw the line on what people can and can?t say in public? ?Impeach Bush? bumpers stickers, sure why not. But ?I?m tired of all the BuShit? is inappropriate just because of the use of the word ?******? in it. Clever yes, acceptable in public no. How many of us would want to explain that bumper sticker to a 5 year old.

Her suing just shows that she is some off the wall leftist trying to make a statement and nothing else.


Cry Sob... It's a right of free speech, now you want to censor what you can put on your bumper? I'll put whatever I want on my bumper ... Thank you very much... I was gonna go online and buy the same one to put on my own bumper...

So what? Who cares what you have on your bumper. Uh, White Hoods and hanging black people is maybe your fantasy but it doesnt even relate to a Bish*t bumper sticker. If you can relate those together then you have a serious problem. I guess you don't mind the how is my driving ? 1800 eat sh*t bumper stickers? Guess nothing wrong with those eh? Seen tons of those... How do you explain that to your six your old? Damn... Wake up.... And for god sake don't vote repub!!! ;)

Where do we draw the line? Well, I'm sure you'd love to draw all over it as long as it fits your needs or ideas. Free Speech ... Get use to it I suppose. Enjoy what rights we have left that is before the bush admin and professor take em all away...
 

Thump553

Lifer
Jun 2, 2000
12,742
2,518
126
The policeman charged her under a statute that was voided 16 years ago. Everyone is supposed to know the laws (remember the maxim ignorance of the law is no excuse) but police officers, as agents of the state, are certainly supposed to know the law.

Frankly in my professional opinion she has an excellent basis for a lawsuit, it's almost a slam dunk on liability. The measure of damages is a different issue.

Sometimes posters here let their political bias overwhelm their ability to think rationally. If you were arrested and charged under a statute that did not exist, don't you think you should have some recourse for that false arrest?

 

shadow9d9

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2004
8,132
2
0
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Maybe someone should get a bumper sticker with pictures of people in white hoods on them and some totally crazy slogan about hanging black people or something else totally offensive and see how the ACLU and the left reacts to that.

Where do we draw the line on what people can and can?t say in public? ?Impeach Bush? bumpers stickers, sure why not. But ?I?m tired of all the BuShit? is inappropriate just because of the use of the word ?******? in it. Clever yes, acceptable in public no. How many of us would want to explain that bumper sticker to a 5 year old.

Her suing just shows that she is some off the wall leftist trying to make a statement and nothing else.


Did you miss the part where the law allows her bumper sticker? Your attempt at censureship is not surprising to me.
 

Harvey

Administrator<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
35,057
60
91
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Maybe someone should get a bumper sticker with pictures of people in white hoods on them and some totally crazy slogan about hanging black people or something else totally offensive and see how the ACLU and the left reacts to that.
Maybe you should learn to read. The ACLU has a long history of defending unpopular and even tasteless causes in the name of preserving all of our rights under the Constitution.
ACLU Statement on Defending Free Speech of Unpopular Organizations (8/31/2000)

NEW YORK--In the United States Supreme Court over the past few years, the American Civil Liberties Union has taken the side of a fundamentalist Christian church, a Santerian church, and the International Society for Krishna Consciousness. In celebrated cases, the ACLU has stood up for everyone from Oliver North to the National Socialist Party. In spite of all that, the ACLU has never advocated Christianity, ritual animal sacrifice, trading arms for hostages or genocide. In representing NAMBLA today, our Massachusetts affiliate does not advocate sexual relationships between adults and children.

What the ACLU does advocate is robust freedom of speech for everyone. The lawsuit involved here, were it to succeed, would strike at the heart of freedom of speech. The case is based on a shocking murder. But the lawsuit says the crime is the responsibility not of those who committed the murder, but of someone who posted vile material on the Internet. The principle is as simple as it is central to true freedom of speech: those who do wrong are responsible for what they do; those who speak about it are not.

It is easy to defend freedom of speech when the message is something many people find at least reasonable. But the defense of freedom of speech is most critical when the message is one most people find repulsive. That was true when the Nazis marched in Skokie. It remains true today.
Even bumbling, babbling boobs like you have the right to blow your smoke and spew your continuous stream of lies.
Where do we draw the line on what people can and can?t say in public? ?Impeach Bush? bumpers stickers, sure why not. But ?I?m tired of all the BuShit? is inappropriate just because of the use of the word ?******? in it. Clever yes, acceptable in public no.
And who the fsck appointed you the official guardian of public taste? :roll:
How many of us would want to explain that bumper sticker to a 5 year old.
Since you're too illiterate to read or understand it, let alone explain it, I guess I'll have to volunteer to try. :cool:
Her suing just shows that she is some off the wall leftist trying to make a statement and nothing else.
Aw... That explains it. She MUST be a < shudder > LEFTIST! You forgot LIBUHRULL, COMMIE and PINKO. :shocked:

You also forgot courageous defender of the U.S. Constitution, but nobody expects you to understand that.
 

smack Down

Diamond Member
Sep 10, 2005
4,507
0
0
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
I thought it was illegal to have a bumper sticker w/ the word Sh*t on it. If not, throw the ticket out. Emotional distress = excuse for big money. In the end, the lawyers and the plaintiff win while everyone else loses.

Free speech is the big winner. The only reason she is suing for emotional distress is so she has standing in the court case. If she didn't have any damages she couldn't sue and make a point. The ACLU isn't out to make a buck on this case.
 

palehorse

Lifer
Dec 21, 2005
11,521
0
76
Originally posted by: Craig234
One loudmouth above (not John) posts how because she was found not guilty she should be glad.

I'd like to see him given a ticket for a pro-Bush bumper sticker by a liberal cop who thought any pro-Bush message is offensive, have him go to court, and not complain.

I believe that I resemble that "loudmouth." So, would I complain? sure I would! but I would do so with an editorial in the paper and a letter to the officer's supervisor in hopes of seeing the ignorant officer disciplined. And if that didnt work, I would continue writing letters or posting fliers until something was done.

What I would not do is SUE FOR DAMAGES over the issue! I'm sorry, but there is no justification for this whiny #%#%'s financial lawsuit.

That said, I see nothing wrong with the BUShit bumper sticker, or any other...
 

shadow9d9

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2004
8,132
2
0
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: Craig234
One loudmouth above (not John) posts how because she was found not guilty she should be glad.

I'd like to see him given a ticket for a pro-Bush bumper sticker by a liberal cop who thought any pro-Bush message is offensive, have him go to court, and not complain.

I believe that I resemble that "loudmouth." So, would I complain? sure I would! but I would do so with an editorial in the paper and a letter to the officer's supervisor in hopes of seeing the ignorant officer disciplined. And if that didnt work, I would continue writing letters or posting fliers until something was done.

What I would not do is SUE FOR DAMAGES over the issue! I'm sorry, but there is no justification for this whiny #%#%'s financial lawsuit.

That said, I see nothing wrong with the BUShit bumper sticker, or any other...


"What I would not do is SUE FOR DAMAGES over the issue!"

Well, since you weren't involved, why should we care what you would do? You seem to think your opinion is the end all.. similar to ProfJohn.
 

shadow9d9

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2004
8,132
2
0
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Maybe someone should get a bumper sticker with pictures of people in white hoods on them and some totally crazy slogan about hanging black people or something else totally offensive and see how the ACLU and the left reacts to that.

If the left are the only defenders of freedom of speech, then we have a huge problem here...
 

PELarson

Platinum Member
Mar 27, 2001
2,289
0
0
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Maybe someone should get a bumper sticker with pictures of people in white hoods on them and some totally crazy slogan about hanging black people or something else totally offensive and see how the ACLU and the left reacts to that.

If the left are the only defenders of freedom of speech, then we have a huge problem here...

Guess what.... WE ARE IN BIG TROUNLE!!!!!!
 

PELarson

Platinum Member
Mar 27, 2001
2,289
0
0
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Maybe someone should get a bumper sticker with pictures of people in white hoods on them and some totally crazy slogan about hanging black people or something else totally offensive and see how the ACLU and the left reacts to that.

Skokie IL
 

kingtas

Senior member
Aug 26, 2006
421
0
0
Originally posted by: Thump553
The policeman charged her under a statute that was voided 16 years ago. Everyone is supposed to know the laws (remember the maxim ignorance of the law is no excuse) but police officers, as agents of the state, are certainly supposed to know the law.

Frankly in my professional opinion she has an excellent basis for a lawsuit, it's almost a slam dunk on liability. The measure of damages is a different issue.

Sometimes posters here let their political bias overwhelm their ability to think rationally. If you were arrested and charged under a statute that did not exist, don't you think you should have some recourse for that false arrest?

the initial stop was made to enforce a non-existant law. That is in violation of her rights, is it not?