WMD Thread: Find the WMD Game - Winner gets 14K Trophy 10% profits and a Barrel of Oil

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
12-17-2003 Find The WMD Game

It may sound like the game has a political subtext ? a satire of the hunt that has thus far found no real WMDs in Iraq. If no one finds the trophy by Election Day 2004, Messer will send the gold and the barrel of oil to President Bush.

But Messer said he has no agenda. He calls himself "a slightly liberal Republican" who believes there are weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, but he's not sure if America will ever find them.


12-14-2003 President Bush speech on Capture of Saddam Hussein. No Mention of WMD?

 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Now the "Real Chicken Little" French want to join in Iraq.
rolleye.gif
 

Cougar

Golden Member
Feb 26, 2000
1,761
0
0
I think going into a long winded speech about WMD's would have been in bad taste (regardless of how you feel about Bush, the War and the reasons we're there). Our boys finally captured that scumbag and that's why he made any statement.

God bless our troops over there and they deserve a massive pat on the back for risking their lives day after day. Saddam's been captured and that's some great news in the midst of all the losses we and the Iraqi people suffer each day.
 

UltraQuiet

Banned
Sep 22, 2001
5,755
0
0
Neither did Tony Blair and he said Saddam was aiming WMD at England to be launched in 45 minutes.

He never said any such thing.

Every time I read I read one of your posts I am continuously amazed at just how fscking stupid you really are. It is blatantly obvious why you had the legal problems that you did, why you had such a hard time finding a job and the continuous beratement you suffer on this board. The stupid will be punished.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Neither did Tony Blair and he said Saddam was aiming WMD at England to be launched in 45 minutes.

He never said any such thing.

Every time I read I read one of your posts I am continuously amazed at just how fscking stupid you really are. It is blatantly obvious why you had the legal problems that you did, why you had such a hard time finding a job and the continuous beratement you suffer on this board. The stupid will be punished.
WTF Dave, what does that have to do with the topic of this thread?
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Neither did Tony Blair and he said Saddam was aiming WMD at England to be launched in 45 minutes.

He never said any such thing.

Every time I read I read one of your posts I am continuously amazed at just how fscking stupid you really are. It is blatantly obvious why you had the legal problems that you did, why you had such a hard time finding a job and the continuous beratement you suffer on this board. The stupid will be punished.
WTF Dave, what does that have to do with the topic of this thread?

Blair gave a speech earlier today around 9am our time and he did not mention the WMD either.

There were posts and discussions here about Blair's pre-war speech where he said Saddam will unleash WMD in 45 minutes.
How quickly people forget. Especially Bush loyalists.


 

UltraQuiet

Banned
Sep 22, 2001
5,755
0
0
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Neither did Tony Blair and he said Saddam was aiming WMD at England to be launched in 45 minutes.

He never said any such thing.

Every time I read I read one of your posts I am continuously amazed at just how fscking stupid you really are. It is blatantly obvious why you had the legal problems that you did, why you had such a hard time finding a job and the continuous beratement you suffer on this board. The stupid will be punished.
WTF Dave, what does that have to do with the topic of this thread?

The first sentence is just a correction to the continuously wrong Dave "Chicken Little" Mcowen.

The second part is just me venting at him for having to continuously suffer/wade through his idiocy to get to the posts worth reading. I'm done now.
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Neither did Tony Blair and he said Saddam was aiming WMD at England to be launched in 45 minutes.

He never said any such thing.

Every time I read I read one of your posts I am continuously amazed at just how fscking stupid you really are. It is blatantly obvious why you had the legal problems that you did, why you had such a hard time finding a job and the continuous beratement you suffer on this board. The stupid will be punished.
WTF Dave, what does that have to do with the topic of this thread?

The first sentence is just a correction to the continuously wrong Dave "Chicken Little" Mcowen.

The second part is just me venting at him for having to continuously suffer/wade through his idiocy to get to the posts worth reading. I'm done now.

Oh I get it. The News should change the Title from the capture of saddam to "We got the WMD!"

 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Neither did Tony Blair and he said Saddam was aiming WMD at England to be launched in 45 minutes.

He never said any such thing.

Every time I read I read one of your posts I am continuously amazed at just how fscking stupid you really are. It is blatantly obvious why you had the legal problems that you did, why you had such a hard time finding a job and the continuous beratement you suffer on this board. The stupid will be punished.
WTF Dave, what does that have to do with the topic of this thread?

The first sentence is just a correction to the continuously wrong Dave "Chicken Little" Mcowen.

The second part is just me venting at him for having to continuously suffer/wade through his idiocy to get to the posts worth reading. I'm done now.
Sorry Dave, I was being an extreme hypocrite.
 

UltraQuiet

Banned
Sep 22, 2001
5,755
0
0
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Neither did Tony Blair and he said Saddam was aiming WMD at England to be launched in 45 minutes.

He never said any such thing.

Every time I read I read one of your posts I am continuously amazed at just how fscking stupid you really are. It is blatantly obvious why you had the legal problems that you did, why you had such a hard time finding a job and the continuous beratement you suffer on this board. The stupid will be punished.
WTF Dave, what does that have to do with the topic of this thread?

The first sentence is just a correction to the continuously wrong Dave "Chicken Little" Mcowen.

The second part is just me venting at him for having to continuously suffer/wade through his idiocy to get to the posts worth reading. I'm done now.

Oh I get it. The News should change the Title from the capture of saddam to "We got the WMD!"

No you don't "get it". You're obviously not smart enough to "get it".

Provide a link to this "Tony Blair and he said Saddam was aiming WMD at England to be launched in 45 minutes." or shut up and go away.

Please.


 

MonstaThrilla

Golden Member
Sep 16, 2000
1,652
0
0
I saw on NBC this morning that the search for WMDs is being ended, and the human resources used for that search are being shifted to other, more important, missions.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
73,633
6,454
126
Good grief, UQ, I'm sure glad you don't get as mad at Bush and Blair when they misrepresent the facts.
 

gaga38

Member
Apr 15, 2003
33
0
0
Originally posted by: MonstaThrilla
I saw on NBC this morning that the search for WMDs is being ended, and the human resources used for that search are being shifted to other, more important, missions.

good because it is a waste of time and human ressources to chase a ghost
ppl would be more useful to secure irak
 

Murphyrulez

Golden Member
Mar 24, 2001
1,890
0
0
Originally posted by: zzzz
look here
see at other links blair 45 minutes claim


Nowhere does it say that Saddam was going to launch WMD in 45 minutes. Those links say that Saddam COULD launch WMD in 45 minutes. Sorta like it could take GWB 5 minutes to give the order to launch nukes.

Blair was making the threat known, making it clear how little time they would have if Saddam would decide to do it.


What's the problem?
 

LunarRay

Diamond Member
Mar 2, 2003
9,993
1
76
I don't think the word "England" was used in that context. Their missle capabilities were less than 800km as I understand it and more like 300 km max.
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
No mention of WMD?

Why exactly should WMDs be mentioned? Saddam was captured - THAT was the news - THAT is what Bush spoke about.

I think people are still trying to find things to overshadow this capture event with other "why not..." rhetoric. Yes we still need to secure the country, Yes we still need to capture OBL, Yes we still need to find out what happened to the WMDs - but that DOES NOT mean that this capture of Saddam isn't a big event. Not only is it a big event in our continued war in Iraq - but it is a HUGE event for the people of Iraq. Saddam will no longer be a threat to the people of Iraq - He will never return to power. Hopefully the people of Iraq will be able to free themselves from the fear that he might return. Sure there may be more attacks - sure there might be more "stormy weather" ahead in Iraq but this most definately is good news for all involved....except for Saddam loyalists;) Maybe now people will focus on the other good news and allow it to be reported...but maybe I ask/expect too much...

Just a question I asked myself during all the shows this morning which none of them to my knowledge addressed specifically was - I wonder how much manpower will be freed up to now focus on other things instead of just Saddam. IMO there had to have been hundreds if not thousands of people(across many agencies and units) whos specific task it was to find Saddam.
This question has nothing to do with the Kay thing but todays events could however affect the outcome of the continuance of the Kay situation. But that can be addressed in a different thread. I am very curious to see what kind of manpower was specifically assigned to finding and tracking Saddam - IMO the number was quite significant.

CkG
 

Gaard

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
8,911
1
0
The claim was that it was thought that Iraq could launch WMD within 45 minutes of giving the order. Launch...as in ground troops (or a similarly close target). A while back Dave was like "Oh my GOD!!! Blair said that Iraq could attack England with WMD within 45 minutes!" I told Dave "No Dave. The claim wasn't that he could attack England, but that he could attack ground troops." Apparently Dave chose to ignore this because he has stated this false claim on numerous occasions since that.

If someone is still a subscriber they could do a 'body' search for '45 minutes' by me....to verify my story.


The statement is simply more BULLSH!T by dmcowen674.
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: Gaard
The claim was that it was thought that Iraq could launch WMD within 45 minutes of giving the order. Launch...as in ground troops (or a similarly close target). A while back Dave was like "Oh my GOD!!! Blair said that Iraq could attack England with WMD within 45 minutes!" I told Dave "No Dave. The claim wasn't that he could attack England, but that he could attack ground troops." Apparently Dave chose to ignore this because he has stated this false claim on numerous occasions since that.

If someone is still a subscriber they could do a 'body' search for '45 minutes' by me....to verify my story.


The statement is simply more BULLSH!T by dmcowen674.

So you still stick to your guns that Blair wasn't selling the Britons a Bill Of Goods?
rolleye.gif
 

Gaard

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
8,911
1
0
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Gaard
The claim was that it was thought that Iraq could launch WMD within 45 minutes of giving the order. Launch...as in ground troops (or a similarly close target). A while back Dave was like "Oh my GOD!!! Blair said that Iraq could attack England with WMD within 45 minutes!" I told Dave "No Dave. The claim wasn't that he could attack England, but that he could attack ground troops." Apparently Dave chose to ignore this because he has stated this false claim on numerous occasions since that.

If someone is still a subscriber they could do a 'body' search for '45 minutes' by me....to verify my story.


The statement is simply more BULLSH!T by dmcowen674.

So you still stick to your guns that Blair wasn't selling the Britons a Bill Of Goods?
rolleye.gif

WTF are you talking about?