The fastest i3 (4370) is 3.8 Ghz. Here is G3258 at 3.8Ghz on a B85 motherboard, with a stock cooler:
IMAGE
The G3258 costs $60, and the i3-4370 costs $150. If anyone really thinks Hyperthreading and an extra 1MB of cache is worth $90, well, a fool is born every day.
Only advantage for the 860K over the Pentium it seems is to dupe games that "require" quad cores and or AVX. Though it's entirely possible some games that require 4 cores really need them thanks to crappy coding (AC Unity, Dying Light).
WOW!!! Fantastic information in here, guys... thank you!
I'm sure glad I asked because the AMD chip sure left me disappointed. The cheapest H81 mobo + i3 seems a far better choice overall.
Heck, I should hunt for some used i3 or i5 processors. My local kijiji has a couple deals to be had, one place even had a used i5-2500(non-K) for $95 CDN which is very tempting. Newegg still sells 1155 ITX H61 boards. I even saw a G520 Celeron for a lousy $20 but I'll lose the onboard WIFI that route....
Looks like the AMD route is cheap for a reason. Such a shame... I used to be a big AMD fan for the value+performance.
WOW!!! Fantastic information in here, guys... thank you!
I'm sure glad I asked because the AMD chip sure left me disappointed. The cheapest H81 mobo + i3 seems a far better choice overall.
Heck, I should hunt for some used i3 or i5 processors. My local kijiji has a couple deals to be had, one place even had a used i5-2500(non-K) for $95 CDN which is very tempting. Newegg still sells 1155 ITX H61 boards. I even saw a G520 Celeron for a lousy $20 but I'll lose the onboard WIFI that route....
Looks like the AMD route is cheap for a reason. Such a shame... I used to be a big AMD fan for the value+performance.
All CPUs will get some legs back, no matter the brand. This bechmark is supposed to be a worst case scenario for CPU load, so there's a good chance 4 threaded CPUs will be able to feed all but the top end GPUs.So maybe we see DX12 give AMD some legs back (when used with larger dGPU at medium or high settings)?
All CPUs will get some legs back, no matter the brand. This bechmark is supposed to be a worst case scenario for CPU load, so there's a good chance 4 threaded CPUs will be able to feed all but the top end GPUs.
860k on sale at fry's today $64.
Intel i3 is always a bad deal. Check the price of Intel G3258.
But yes, 860K is viable. You'd need to move to a Intel CPU to make the most of a >$150 video card. But paired with a $120 video card, it offers little disadvantage compared to any Intel processor when gaming.
860k on sale at fry's today $64.
A dual core is a waste of money in 2015.
860k on sale at fry's today $64.
Just an FYI: beware any review featuring a Kaveri quad (860k, 7850k, etc) clocked over 4.5 ghz. There are many FM2+ motherboards that effectively restrict Kaveri chips to 4.5 ghz, beyond which point there is no scaling with clockspeed whatsoever. Some users have reported slower results at 4.6/4.7 ghz than at 4.5 ghz.
The ASRock board used in the hardcoreware.net benchmark is certainly guilty of scaling problems beyond 4.5 ghz.
The problem may be more of an issue with the APUs than with the 860k, though I've certainly heard of people still having the problem with an 860k before.
Dunno how you can even consider the 860k.
Didn't you already have another thread/posts in a thread earlier about going to a 4790k blue max?
