- Jul 3, 2003
- 74,544
- 924
- 126
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
And no, the 1 series doesn't count. It is too heavy and far too expensive to count.
Originally posted by: Black88GTA
The 1 series is what the 2002 would have been if it were released today. You could never release something like the 2002 now and still keep it "true" to the original, IMO. First off, you'd have to conform to all safety / emissions regs at an absolute minimum to keep the government happy.
Then comes acceptable fuel consumption, reliability (no carbs), creature comforts, interior appointments, noise insulation, power options, etc. that the manufacturers (especially a high-end nameplate like BMW) practically have to include in their cars to generate any kind of sales. A car without these things at a BMW price point would have very very few buyers. And with all of this stuff, of course, comes lots of extra weight and a high price tag.
Tack all that shit onto an old 2002, with the increased weight and price, and you get a 1-seriesStyle it how you will, maybe take cues from the old 2002, but the new car would be nothing like the original.
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: Black88GTA
The 1 series is what the 2002 would have been if it were released today. You could never release something like the 2002 now and still keep it "true" to the original, IMO. First off, you'd have to conform to all safety / emissions regs at an absolute minimum to keep the government happy.
Then comes acceptable fuel consumption, reliability (no carbs), creature comforts, interior appointments, noise insulation, power options, etc. that the manufacturers (especially a high-end nameplate like BMW) practically have to include in their cars to generate any kind of sales. A car without these things at a BMW price point would have very very few buyers. And with all of this stuff, of course, comes lots of extra weight and a high price tag.
Tack all that shit onto an old 2002, with the increased weight and price, and you get a 1-seriesStyle it how you will, maybe take cues from the old 2002, but the new car would be nothing like the original.
They could have done it so much better than the 1 series though. That thing looks like someone hit it with an ugly stick...repeatedly.
Originally posted by: Black88GTA
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: Black88GTA
The 1 series is what the 2002 would have been if it were released today. You could never release something like the 2002 now and still keep it "true" to the original, IMO. First off, you'd have to conform to all safety / emissions regs at an absolute minimum to keep the government happy.
Then comes acceptable fuel consumption, reliability (no carbs), creature comforts, interior appointments, noise insulation, power options, etc. that the manufacturers (especially a high-end nameplate like BMW) practically have to include in their cars to generate any kind of sales. A car without these things at a BMW price point would have very very few buyers. And with all of this stuff, of course, comes lots of extra weight and a high price tag.
Tack all that shit onto an old 2002, with the increased weight and price, and you get a 1-seriesStyle it how you will, maybe take cues from the old 2002, but the new car would be nothing like the original.
They could have done it so much better than the 1 series though. That thing looks like someone hit it with an ugly stick...repeatedly.
Can't argue with that really. I'm not a huge fan of the 1 either. I don't hate it, but wouldn't buy one. The line is too blurred between the 1 and the 3 series - they are too close in size, in my opinion.
Originally posted by: ballmode
I hate to say it but I would almost want the 128 with sports package just to save the headaches of the turbos 100k miles later
Originally posted by: Arkaign
Originally posted by: ballmode
I hate to say it but I would almost want the 128 with sports package just to save the headaches of the turbos 100k miles later
Ditto with the Audis. I seldom hear of a Turbo Audi or VW lasting more than ~120k miles without some serious work with the turbos, fuel delivery, the top end of the motor, and what not. I expect the *35i BMW's to be more of the same.
Of course, many people who drive those kinds of cars trade them in after 2 years or just lease them for a short period anyway, and those concerns are a non-issue.
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: Black88GTA
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: Black88GTA
The 1 series is what the 2002 would have been if it were released today. You could never release something like the 2002 now and still keep it "true" to the original, IMO. First off, you'd have to conform to all safety / emissions regs at an absolute minimum to keep the government happy.
Then comes acceptable fuel consumption, reliability (no carbs), creature comforts, interior appointments, noise insulation, power options, etc. that the manufacturers (especially a high-end nameplate like BMW) practically have to include in their cars to generate any kind of sales. A car without these things at a BMW price point would have very very few buyers. And with all of this stuff, of course, comes lots of extra weight and a high price tag.
Tack all that shit onto an old 2002, with the increased weight and price, and you get a 1-seriesStyle it how you will, maybe take cues from the old 2002, but the new car would be nothing like the original.
They could have done it so much better than the 1 series though. That thing looks like someone hit it with an ugly stick...repeatedly.
Can't argue with that really. I'm not a huge fan of the 1 either. I don't hate it, but wouldn't buy one. The line is too blurred between the 1 and the 3 series - they are too close in size, in my opinion.
The 1 series is like the ugly midget cousin to the 3 series...inferior in every way yet only slightly so in price.
Originally posted by: rh71
The 1 definitely needs a price reduction but the performance is there, especially given the weight. But everytime I see one passing by, I look at its ass and think it's a Ford. The only saving grace are the nicer rims that make it look somewhat sporty. I understand what BMW is doing, but out-the-door for $40k+ for a 1-series? Only with other people's money.
Originally posted by: Arkaign
Originally posted by: ballmode
I hate to say it but I would almost want the 128 with sports package just to save the headaches of the turbos 100k miles later
Ditto with the Audis. I seldom hear of a Turbo Audi or VW lasting more than ~120k miles without some serious work with the turbos, fuel delivery, the top end of the motor, and what not. I expect the *35i BMW's to be more of the same.
Of course, many people who drive those kinds of cars trade them in after 2 years or just lease them for a short period anyway, and those concerns are a non-issue.
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Originally posted by: Arkaign
Originally posted by: ballmode
I hate to say it but I would almost want the 128 with sports package just to save the headaches of the turbos 100k miles later
Ditto with the Audis. I seldom hear of a Turbo Audi or VW lasting more than ~120k miles without some serious work with the turbos, fuel delivery, the top end of the motor, and what not. I expect the *35i BMW's to be more of the same.
Of course, many people who drive those kinds of cars trade them in after 2 years or just lease them for a short period anyway, and those concerns are a non-issue.
Eh, I'm not so sure. Turbos can work just fine in high-mileage vehicles. I'm over 160k and still climbing with my 951 and there haven't been issues with the turbo. Closing in on 130k with the S70 and the turbo's still in great shape on that too. Water cooling for turbos is a fantastic advantage.
Still whether BMW's application will work as well remains to be seen.
ZV
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Uh? I don't see it.