Are you trying to elevate the insult 'retard' to a new level?
No, I don't recall using that insult, in part because more retarded people wouldn't make the mistakes you do.
How am I suppose to check "what I heard'? I heard what I heard. I made no cliam about he was able to do what he said.
If you had just posted 'you heard this', I could understand the mistake. You don't expect the Republicans to do something so ridiculously clear against the constitution.
But you did not just say you heard this. You challenged someone who had posted, after it was discussed what the Republicans were doing, and someone else posted that they thought there were legal obstacles with doing it, based on nothing more than basically repeating the first statement what the Republicans said, without any checking into the question the person raised about the legal issues.
It would be like someone saying 'the healthcare bill requires mandatory insurance purchase', and someone saying there are constitutional questions about the government doing that, and you responding 'no, you heard Nancy Pelosi say the bill has that'. Not adding anything to the discussion about the legal challenged - just pretending to address them. And then when someone says 'too bad you can't bother to check the issue a little before you post', you respond with the sort of attacks you did.
You are just reinforcing the point with your response. You can't be bothered to check.
Nowhere did I comment about the law etc. I only commented about what he said.
You *responded* to the point there were legal issues with what he said not with any informed response - but by implying that was wrong just because he said it.
And now you pretend you did not imply he was wrong for no reason, by acting like a bratty child.
Finally to make yourself even more ridiculous, you post an argument I already made about how even if unconstitutional there's a chance it could affect the vote before any unconstitutionality has any impact, as if it's your point and you are actually saying anything about the legal issues you couldn't be bothered to check before you attacked a post about them - and you are childishly insulting yet again.
Too bad the ignore function doesn't work for you as I tried it before, and manually doesn't always miss your 'posts'.