Originally posted by: TranceNation
what's wrong with just getting wireless speakers?
Originally posted by: crystal
Heh, whenever they market one that is acceptable good, I would replace it with the current set up at home. No more wires around the house, woohoo... I wonder what those 10K wires saleman will do to stay in business. Wires sale with 99% off maybe?![]()
Hmm... how much power can you send wirelessly? Sometimes you need more than 100W per speaker...Originally posted by: fyleow
Originally posted by: crystal
Heh, whenever they market one that is acceptable good, I would replace it with the current set up at home. No more wires around the house, woohoo... I wonder what those 10K wires saleman will do to stay in business. Wires sale with 99% off maybe?![]()
You'd need to have D/A converters at every speaker for that to work right? It's going to cost way too much money to get the quality that audiophiles are looking for.
Originally posted by: scottdog81
ok, so has anyone done this?
Here is what I was thinking:
I could have the front 3 speakers / sub wired obviously, since they won't be having to go across my living room.
For the surround speakers I would get a pair of them. So does the transmitter for the wireless speakers just hook into the receiver? This is the part that confuses me. Also, can someone recommend me a good pair of wireless speakers that aren't going to cost me an arm and a leg. I'd like to keep my entire budget under $1k (including receiver/5.1 setup).