http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/13/...al-galaxy-s-and-s-ii-galaxy-ace-from-lawsuit/
Uh but the SGS1 was the main offender in trade dress issues I'd say. The SGS2 maybe a little, but it was more square. THe T-Mobile Vibrant is the only one I'd say looks too much like an iPhone, but if they're cutting away the main SGS1 and SGS2, then really Samsung got a huge breather. The Captivate, Fascinate, and Epic 4G aren't really iPhone clones.
Yes they do. You could make Eclipse look very similar to that. Lots of IDE's look very alike. I know this because I work with compilers that work on embedded devices.
It looks like the judge was referring specifically to the international versions of the SGS1/2.
“Why did you not let them [Intel] know [about Williams] before last night” the Judge asked.
“I don’t know why,” a Samsung attorney said.
“I want to see papers, I don’t trust what any lawyer tells me in this courtroom[,” Koh said, deferring a ruling until formal briefs are submitted.
Thus far I've been staying out of this thread in case I needed to moderate, but this quote from Judge Lucy Koh is too good not to mention it:
http://cdn.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4394020/Sparks-fly-as-Intel-shows-up-at-Apple-case
Thus far I've been staying out of this thread in case I needed to moderate, but this quote from Judge Lucy Koh is too good not to mention it:
http://cdn.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4394020/Sparks-fly-as-Intel-shows-up-at-Apple-case
As background, the issue is that an expert witness for Samsung had reviewed Intel code but Samsung didn't notify Intel in a timely manner that their witness would be called so Intel objected to the witness testifying. But I thought the quote at the end was amusing.
It's worth mentioning that I work for Intel - which is how I heard about this - and that I'm not a spokesperson for Intel and I'm not commenting in any way about the trial.
You've clearly never done of sort of work.
Sure the window arrangements are pretty standard across most IDEs, but look at the gradation syling, the icons, the toolbar, the box with controls on the right bottom, etc. Whoever made this thing, deliberately put a ton of effort to make it look like xcode. Heck, look at the Windows buttons on the top right corner, they look completely out of place in the software.
Thus far I've been staying out of this thread in case I needed to moderate, but this quote from Judge Lucy Koh is too good not to mention it:
http://cdn.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4394020/Sparks-fly-as-Intel-shows-up-at-Apple-case
As background, the issue is that an expert witness for Samsung had reviewed Intel code but Samsung didn't notify Intel in a timely manner that their witness would be called so Intel objected to the witness testifying. But I thought the quote at the end was amusing.
It's worth mentioning that I work for Intel - which is how I heard about this - and that I'm not a spokesperson for Intel and I'm not commenting in any way about the trial.
More procedural screw-ups from Samsung's attorneys. Do they find them at online paper mills?
Samsung is in the top 10 biggest companies in the world by revenue, beating Apple. If they're losing in court, it's not because they don't have the money to hire better lawyers. Apple has just been able to get some highly damning documents (e.g. internal memo re: Touchwiz, internal e-mails, e-mails from Google telling them not to copy Apple) into evidence, and Samsung just has the weaker case. At this point, their PR is in damage mitigation mode, relying on a tired 'fighting over rectangles' argument, but anyone who's studied trade dress knows it's about much more than that.