I'm not familiar with this concept, could you elaborate? I mean, I think I know what breadcrumbing is, but I don't recall having seen it in gnome/kde.Originally posted by: Seeruk
The breadcrumb navigation is also very handy and removes the only thing i preffered about the gnome/kde desktops.
Seems like microsoft has really been paying attention to the little helpers that'll make navigation easier. That's something I would have expected osx to have first. I think we'll see various platforms do some microsoft immitation in the years following vista's release, if they don't do it first :evil:The alt tab thumbnail previews of the screens you are tabbing around is superb (likewise the hovering of a stacked pile of taskbar windows provides similar thumbs)
They actually called the email program 'Mail'? lol :laugh: There's nothing wrong with the name in and of itself, but...Apart from that there is tons of new stuff already... my favourite of which is Microsoft Mail, its the revamped Outlook Express but looks and acts much more like Outlook 2003 thus removing the need to use Outlook (unless you need some of the more corporate features).
Originally posted by: kamper
I'm not familiar with this concept, could you elaborate? I mean, I think I know what breadcrumbing is, but I don't recall having seen it in gnome/kde.The breadcrumb navigation is also very handy and removes the only thing i preffered about the gnome/kde desktops.
They actually called the email program 'Mail'? lol :laugh: There's nothing wrong with the name in and of itself, but...
Like every windows version, the changes will be minimal or look minimal. It will be made for users to be use instantly, and what other way can you archieve that by maintaining the same uniformal look that windows has.
As an more than average user i hope for shadow copies on the desktop/laptop OS, which first made their introduction on w2k3, to be implemented on the system. Its easier to backup and costs less time.
I think he's refering to VSS.Originally posted by: bsobel
As an more than average user i hope for shadow copies on the desktop/laptop OS, which first made their introduction on w2k3, to be implemented on the system. Its easier to backup and costs less time.
Huh? Shadow copy first appeared in XP.
Bill
Originally posted by: spyordie007
I think he's refering to VSS.Originally posted by: bsobel
As an more than average user i hope for shadow copies on the desktop/laptop OS, which first made their introduction on w2k3, to be implemented on the system. Its easier to backup and costs less time.
Huh? Shadow copy first appeared in XP.
Bill
Vista is basically to windows what kernel 2.6 kernel was to the previous 2.4 linux system. Its user interface is a proprietary gui built off of c, c++ and .net that incorporates ideas already found in GNU modifications for the X windows system and tools pioneered by apple for OS X.
Originally posted by: STaSh
Vista is basically to windows what kernel 2.6 kernel was to the previous 2.4 linux system. Its user interface is a proprietary gui built off of c, c++ and .net that incorporates ideas already found in GNU modifications for the X windows system and tools pioneered by apple for OS X.
Do you have anything else to contribute to this forum? This is the third or fourth time I've seen you post this FUD.
Originally posted by: bsobel
As an more than average user i hope for shadow copies on the desktop/laptop OS, which first made their introduction on w2k3, to be implemented on the system. Its easier to backup and costs less time.
Huh? Shadow copy first appeared in XP.
Bill
Originally posted by: Brazen
Originally posted by: bsobel
As an more than average user i hope for shadow copies on the desktop/laptop OS, which first made their introduction on w2k3, to be implemented on the system. Its easier to backup and costs less time.
Huh? Shadow copy first appeared in XP.
Bill
No, I believe only the Shadow Copy client is on XP, but the network share must be located on a Windows 2003 server.
Instead of just saying it's 'FUD' could you explain why for the less informed or so we could put more faith in your statement?
Yes the service existed for backups under XP; but they are refering to using the shadow copy service on shares to restore files to previous versions as you can under 2K3 server:Originally posted by: bsobel
Originally posted by: Brazen
Originally posted by: bsobel
As an more than average user i hope for shadow copies on the desktop/laptop OS, which first made their introduction on w2k3, to be implemented on the system. Its easier to backup and costs less time.
Huh? Shadow copy first appeared in XP.
Bill
No, I believe only the Shadow Copy client is on XP, but the network share must be located on a Windows 2003 server.
The poster talked about shadow copies and making backup-easier. XP includes the Volume Shadow Copy service and the backup application uses it, so I'm not sure what feature he's hoping for (perhaps I'm confused!)
Yeah, I understand that much perfectly. I've just never actually seen it implemented in a filesystem browser.Originally posted by: Seeruk
Originally posted by: kamper
I'm not familiar with this concept, could you elaborate? I mean, I think I know what breadcrumbing is, but I don't recall having seen it in gnome/kde.The breadcrumb navigation is also very handy and removes the only thing i preffered about the gnome/kde desktops.
Hmmm kinda hard in words ... but say you navigate to C drive > Temp folder > folder xyz then in XP to get back up to C you would need to either press the up button twice or close the window and start again (assuming you aint using explorer)
With breadcrumbing you have a toolbar that adds each part of the path as a seperate button as you drill down looking something like:
|C Drive||Temp||XYZ|
so you can navigate back up to any random part of the path with a single click.
I don't think you understand why I'm laughingThey actually called the email program 'Mail'? lol :laugh: There's nothing wrong with the name in and of itself, but...
Hardly gonna win any naming contests is itThen they say beauty is simplicity
![]()
Originally posted by: bsobel
Instead of just saying it's 'FUD' could you explain why for the less informed or so we could put more faith in your statement?
You need more info to have faith in Stash vs a newbie with 8 posts.... Wow, sad.
Windows VISTA! Now with 50% more Linux!Originally posted by: xtknight
What I gathered from it was:
[*]Avalon/WinFX for developers
[*].NET to be used more in the future
[*]New themes
[*]Security fixes under the hood (better rootkit protection? user management?)
[*]IE7
[*]Better Explorer navigation system
[*]Better window management (3d?)
[*]Steeper hardware requirements
[*]New Longhorn Display Model with which OpenGL will be emulated and new graphics cards will have to comply.
[*]New file 'preview' in Explorer which has been in Gnautilus for at least a year.
Right... :roll:Originally posted by: doornail
Don't forget the crippled video unless you buy a DRM-certified monitor. That's WAY new!
Originally posted by: Brazen
Windows VISTA! Now with 50% more Linux!
Why get it all for free when you could have a fraction of the features and PAY PAY PAY !!
Don't forget the crippled video unless you buy a DRM-certified monitor. That's WAY new!