Windows Defender ( Formerly Windows Antispyware )

Sep 3, 2005
47
0
0
well,
I wanted to install it after all,
and it said it needed XP SP2, and since I'm not going to install this crap in order to install Windows Defender, I mark this software "Annoying" from the get-go...
 

CVSiN

Diamond Member
Jul 19, 2004
9,289
1
0
Originally posted by: talyn00
and why is SP2 "crap"?

SP2 is crap =/
still slower and more of a pain in the ass than SP1.. i only update casue most MS software including media center demands it now..
 

Homerboy

Lifer
Mar 1, 2000
30,890
5,001
126
Originally posted by: CVSiN
Originally posted by: talyn00
and why is SP2 "crap"?

SP2 is crap =/
still slower and more of a pain in the ass than SP1.. i only update casue most MS software including media center demands it now..

sounds like you fell into the anti-MS marketing. SP2 is PERFECTLY fine on every level. Disable the unneeded Firewall and there is no difference.
 

talyn00

Golden Member
Oct 18, 2003
1,666
0
0
Originally posted by: Homerboy
Originally posted by: CVSiN
Originally posted by: talyn00
and why is SP2 "crap"?

SP2 is crap =/
still slower and more of a pain in the ass than SP1.. i only update casue most MS software including media center demands it now..

sounds like you fell into the anti-MS marketing. SP2 is PERFECTLY fine on every level. Disable the unneeded Firewall and there is no difference.

i find it runs nearly the same as SP1 after disabling some of the more annoying features of SP2 (like the reminders for anti-virus and firewall)
 
Sep 3, 2005
47
0
0

sounds like you fell into the anti-MS marketing. SP2 is PERFECTLY fine on every level. Disable the unneeded Firewall and there is no difference.


please don't make me a brainwashed microsoft hater...

I have no problem with most of their applications but I recall installing SP2 a year ago,
and having to deal with many problems (after working hard to configure NIS to perfection) I don't need a built in pop up blocker ( 'cause I use firefox anyway), don't need their firewall, don't need annoying reminders.

I just don't need SP2...

 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
SP2 has caused an Acer system to become unstable.

Rock solid with the original XP Home.

Flaky when SP2/Updates were installed.

I reinstalled with the OEM disks; dropped on ZA & AVG; burned a Ghost and disabled the Updates.
 

mechBgon

Super Moderator<br>Elite Member
Oct 31, 1999
30,699
1
0
I have no problem with most of their applications but I recall installing SP2 a year ago,
and having to deal with many problems (after working hard to configure NIS to perfection) I don't need a built in pop up blocker ( 'cause I use firefox anyway), don't need their firewall, don't need annoying reminders.

I just don't need SP2...
If you think SP2 is mainly a pop-up blocker, a firewall and reminders, you're merely looking at the superficial stuff. Remember the zero-day WMF exploit that was running around for close to a month before it was brought to light and detectable by antivirus apps? With SP2 and a hardware-DEP-equipped CPU, you could be preemptively protected from that, to give just a single example of how SP2 is better.

And if you think you need an antispyware app like Defender, but not SP2, then I don't understand your logic. :confused: In the WMF exploit example, guess what it was being used to do? Install nasty stuff like SpyAxe. Having used Microsoft AntiSpyware beta before, I can also remark that any "slowdown" resulting from SP2 is going to pale in comparison to the sluggish feel of a system equipped with MS AntiSpyware.

Think about this. If you are installing SP2 on a longstanding Windows install then I do suggest installing it in Safe Mode.
 

JackMDS

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 25, 1999
29,563
432
126
Originally posted by: rogerwilco
well,
I wanted to install it after all,
and it said it needed XP SP2, and since I'm not going to install this crap in order to install Windows Defender, I mark this software "Annoying" from the get-go...
You can always find some body that would call some thing in the world around us "Crap" (and I mean every thing not just computer related, and the same apply to "Annoying from the get-go".:confused:

Can you explain your claims in specific technical terms?:thumbsup:

Did you Benchmarked the Applications that you use on your own computer after upgrading to SP2 and it showed slowed down? I.e. your Word Processor, and the statistics software that you use for your scientific research work did not work well, or alternatively the pr0n is fuzzy, and the music file produced sound in disharmony?
:shocked:

:sun:
 

techs

Lifer
Sep 26, 2000
28,559
4
0
I was running MS Antispy and updated to Defender.
The first thing you notice is there is no longer a systray icon.
You can see these three services running in taskmanager to tell it is running:
MSASCui
MsMpEng
MsPMSPSv

It has one good feature that I like. You can specify a drive or folder to scan, a feature that was missing from MS Antispy.
One really bad decision was to drop the advanced settings (at least I didn't see them) to explore and control things like bho's, browser restore, downloaded active X ,Startup manager and the like. Plus there is no more tracks eraser.

FYI you can uninstall MS Antispy and install Defender then uninstall Defender and re-install MS Antispy with no apparent problems.
Of course you must already have a copy of Windows Antispy downloaded since it is no longer available on the MS website.

I will be installing Defender on a shop computer and do more extensive testing and will post any issues that arise.
 

dawks

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
5,071
2
81
Originally posted by: mechBgon
I have no problem with most of their applications but I recall installing SP2 a year ago,
and having to deal with many problems (after working hard to configure NIS to perfection) I don't need a built in pop up blocker ( 'cause I use firefox anyway), don't need their firewall, don't need annoying reminders.

I just don't need SP2...
If you think SP2 is mainly a pop-up blocker, a firewall and reminders, you're merely looking at the superficial stuff. Remember the zero-day WMF exploit that was running around for close to a month before it was brought to light and detectable by antivirus apps? With SP2 and a hardware-DEP-equipped CPU, you could be preemptively protected from that, to give just a single example of how SP2 is better.

And if you think you need an antispyware app like Defender, but not SP2, then I don't understand your logic. :confused: In the WMF exploit example, guess what it was being used to do? Install nasty stuff like SpyAxe. Having used Microsoft AntiSpyware beta before, I can also remark that any "slowdown" resulting from SP2 is going to pale in comparison to the sluggish feel of a system equipped with MS AntiSpyware.

Think about this. If you are installing SP2 on a longstanding Windows install then I do suggest installing it in Safe Mode.


Well said mech. A Windows XP PC should NOT be on the internet WITHOUT SP2. One of the keys to SP2 was that Microsoft completly changed the way their binaries are compiled, which potentially fixed thousands of bug/security/issues itself.

And yes, installing Windows Defender, without wanting to install SP2 is just stupid. The 2 go hand-in-hand really.

I have SP2 running on 50+ machines at work, and 5-6 personal systems I regularly maintain and have no issues with it. It works flawlessly.

Originally posted by: techs
I was running MS Antispy and updated to Defender.
The first thing you notice is there is no longer a systray icon.
You can see these three services running in taskmanager to tell it is running:
MSASCui
MsMpEng
MsPMSPSv

It has one good feature that I like. You can specify a drive or folder to scan, a feature that was missing from MS Antispy.
One really bad decision was to drop the advanced settings (at least I didn't see them) to explore and control things like bho's, browser restore, downloaded active X ,Startup manager and the like. Plus there is no more tracks eraser.

FYI you can uninstall MS Antispy and install Defender then uninstall Defender and re-install MS Antispy with no apparent problems.
Of course you must already have a copy of Windows Antispy downloaded since it is no longer available on the MS website.

I will be installing Defender on a shop computer and do more extensive testing and will post any issues that arise.

I cant seem to find a setting or any mention of realtime protection. Is this still active in Defender? Thats the biggest selling point for most people I've been installing it for. Kind of a pain if it lets you get infected, then cleans it at night during a scan..
 

techs

Lifer
Sep 26, 2000
28,559
4
0
Originally posted by: dawks
Originally posted by: mechBgon
I have no problem with most of their applications but I recall installing SP2 a year ago,
and having to deal with many problems (after working hard to configure NIS to perfection) I don't need a built in pop up blocker ( 'cause I use firefox anyway), don't need their firewall, don't need annoying reminders.

I just don't need SP2...
If you think SP2 is mainly a pop-up blocker, a firewall and reminders, you're merely looking at the superficial stuff. Remember the zero-day WMF exploit that was running around for close to a month before it was brought to light and detectable by antivirus apps? With SP2 and a hardware-DEP-equipped CPU, you could be preemptively protected from that, to give just a single example of how SP2 is better.

And if you think you need an antispyware app like Defender, but not SP2, then I don't understand your logic. :confused: In the WMF exploit example, guess what it was being used to do? Install nasty stuff like SpyAxe. Having used Microsoft AntiSpyware beta before, I can also remark that any "slowdown" resulting from SP2 is going to pale in comparison to the sluggish feel of a system equipped with MS AntiSpyware.

Think about this. If you are installing SP2 on a longstanding Windows install then I do suggest installing it in Safe Mode.


Well said mech. A Windows XP PC should NOT be on the internet WITHOUT SP2. One of the keys to SP2 was that Microsoft completly changed the way their binaries are compiled, which potentially fixed thousands of bug/security/issues itself.

And yes, installing Windows Defender, without wanting to install SP2 is just stupid. The 2 go hand-in-hand really.

I have SP2 running on 50+ machines at work, and 5-6 personal systems I regularly maintain and have no issues with it. It works flawlessly.

Originally posted by: techs
I was running MS Antispy and updated to Defender.
The first thing you notice is there is no longer a systray icon.
You can see these three services running in taskmanager to tell it is running:
MSASCui
MsMpEng
MsPMSPSv

It has one good feature that I like. You can specify a drive or folder to scan, a feature that was missing from MS Antispy.
One really bad decision was to drop the advanced settings (at least I didn't see them) to explore and control things like bho's, browser restore, downloaded active X ,Startup manager and the like. Plus there is no more tracks eraser.

FYI you can uninstall MS Antispy and install Defender then uninstall Defender and re-install MS Antispy with no apparent problems.
Of course you must already have a copy of Windows Antispy downloaded since it is no longer available on the MS website.

I will be installing Defender on a shop computer and do more extensive testing and will post any issues that arise.

I cant seem to find a setting or any mention of realtime protection. Is this still active in Defender? Thats the biggest selling point for most people I've been installing it for. Kind of a pain if it lets you get infected, then cleans it at night during a scan..

Yes, their is real time protection. The way to see its running is to check on the three services listed above in task manager.
Here's a link to the MS forum where you can see more info:
http://www.microsoft.com/athome/securit...r=33d293cc-19b6-404b-865b-565a73822c7f
 

ND40oz

Golden Member
Jul 31, 2004
1,264
0
86
I installed it, I do have a systray icon, looks like a little castle wall, but I can't update my definition files. Everytime I tray to, it gives me this error code: 0x8024002b with no other information.

Any ideas?

Edit: Windows updates has the updated def files.
 

gsellis

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 2003
6,061
0
0
Originally posted by: mechBgon
If you think SP2 is mainly a pop-up blocker, a firewall and reminders, you're merely looking at the superficial stuff. Remember the zero-day WMF exploit that was running around for close to a month before it was brought to light and detectable by antivirus apps? With SP2 and a hardware-DEP-equipped CPU, you could be preemptively protected from that, to give just a single example of how SP2 is better.

And if you think you need an antispyware app like Defender, but not SP2, then I don't understand your logic. :confused: In the WMF exploit example, guess what it was being used to do? Install nasty stuff like SpyAxe. Having used Microsoft AntiSpyware beta before, I can also remark that any "slowdown" resulting from SP2 is going to pale in comparison to the sluggish feel of a system equipped with MS AntiSpyware.

Think about this. If you are installing SP2 on a longstanding Windows install then I do suggest installing it in Safe Mode.
Last time I had to do an executive report, the number was about 30% of new critical bugs do not effect SP2 or are much lower in impact with SP2.

As for speed, we finally deployed it and it has improved my boot time by about 45 seconds from before (corp developer laptop connected to unix servers for doc and source mgmt, GPO, startup script from server, devices, sync My Docs to network storage). Corporate momentum can sometimes really suck...
 

Fritzo

Lifer
Jan 3, 2001
41,920
2,162
126
Yeah! Security fixes, bug fixes, and security tools automatically enabled that are needed but 95% of computer users don't know how to install muchless use = crap!!!!

:roll:
 

Nocturnal

Lifer
Jan 8, 2002
18,927
0
76
Just to let you know you can't install this if you have a pirated copy of Windows. Even if you're able to download the executable itself, it checks your cd-key and if it isn't valid, no install :)
 

techs

Lifer
Sep 26, 2000
28,559
4
0
Originally posted by: ND40oz
I installed it, I do have a systray icon, looks like a little castle wall, but I can't update my definition files. Everytime I tray to, it gives me this error code: 0x8024002b with no other information.

Any ideas?

Edit: Windows updates has the updated def files.
Interesting because in the Defender forums it says you only see the systray icon when Defender is doing something, like warning you of spyware or perhaps running an update, which is why you may be seeing it. There must be a hundred posts of people asking why no tray icon. I didn't get a tray icon either.

 

techs

Lifer
Sep 26, 2000
28,559
4
0
Edit for my previous post.
You DO still have a Start Up progam control under Advanced but the Browser restore is not there, nor the other things like downloaded Active X.
Hint:
If you want to get more control and really see if it is running go to Advanced and check both boxes to notify you when both unknown and known changes are made.
Then change your IE homepage and you will see the info in systray.
 

BigPoppa

Golden Member
Oct 9, 1999
1,930
0
0
Don't do an XP SP2 install a a well used SP1 machine. Do a fresh SP1 install, update. Install SP2, update. Apply AV/AS. Problems be gone.
 

AdamSnow

Diamond Member
Nov 21, 2002
5,736
0
76
Originally posted by: rogerwilco

sounds like you fell into the anti-MS marketing. SP2 is PERFECTLY fine on every level. Disable the unneeded Firewall and there is no difference.


please don't make me a brainwashed microsoft hater...

I have no problem with most of their applications but I recall installing SP2 a year ago,
and having to deal with many problems (after working hard to configure NIS to perfection) I don't need a built in pop up blocker ( 'cause I use firefox anyway), don't need their firewall, don't need annoying reminders.

I just don't need SP2...



Plese stop talking like this.