• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Windows 8 kill code

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Nothinman said:
And even without that specific example, we shouldn't be so willing to give away the rights to our devices on the hopes that a company won't abuse those rights. Because inevitably they will, whether it's intentional or not.
Click to expand...

Don't buy the product. Google and Apple are already doing the same thing in the tablet space. Are you suprised that MS moving into the same space is going to do the same thing?
 
Brovane said:
Don't buy the product. Google and Apple are already doing the same thing in the tablet space. Are you suprised that MS moving into the same space is going to do the same thing?
Click to expand...

Of course I'm not surprised, but Google and Apple are much more niche right now which is why most people don't care or haven't noticed. If MS can actually pull this off you know they'll want to apply it to the desktop side eventually too and that will be one huge step towards never owning your PC again.
 
I'm shocked at the number of people who think it's acceptable to have a company take liberties with their computers. What if the USA re-instituted black slavery, but said we're not actually going to do it? You could look at the last hundred or so years, and say "Yea, maybe they won't", but if I were black, I'd be very uncomfortable, and likely GingTFO of Dodge as soon as possible.
 
lxskllr said:
I'm shocked at the number of people who think it's acceptable to have a company take liberties with their computers. What if the USA re-instituted black slavery, but said we're not actually going to do it? You could look at the last hundred or so years, and say "Yea, maybe they won't", but if I were black, I'd be very uncomfortable, and likely GingTFO of Dodge as soon as possible.
Click to expand...
That's a terrible analogy. Slavery is never good; app killswitches are usually good.
 
ViRGE said:
That's a terrible analogy. Slavery is never good; app killswitches are usually good.
Click to expand...

While I'm not a fan of the analogy either, I would never consider an app kill switch operated by a large corporation a good thing either.
 
ViRGE said:
That's a terrible analogy. Slavery is never good; app killswitches are usually good.
Click to expand...

Then you got wrong point. The point is when there's a contract that says one thing, history, and verbal statements are worthless. It doesn't matter what Apple, Amazon, MS, or you say, when there's a piece of paper that defines what you can do.

On the specific point of kill switches, they aren't good. Maybe I actually like that particular piece of malware. Bonzai buddy had a huge following, even from people that knew it's true nature. A less drastic case is RealPlayer. I liked that bit of software, and after some tweaking, I eliminated its most egregious behavior. The final decision should always be with the person that owns the hardware.
 
lxskllr said:
On the specific point of kill switches, they aren't good. Maybe I actually like that particular piece of malware. Bonzai buddy had a huge following, even from people that knew it's true nature.
Click to expand...
This is true. I knew a lady that installed Bonzai Buddy, and Comet Cursor, intentionally, because she liked them. WeatherBug too.
 
You guys realize that newer processors are going to have a kill switch as well? I'd wager about a week after release someone will come out with a "patch" to disable the MS kill code and remove it from the computer. Same thing with a BIOS update to disable the kill switch on the processor.
 
vtx1300 said:
I hope not ..RMS is insane as far as being a developer ... here is a recent interview with him.
http://www.jupiterbroadcasting.com/17822/richard-stallman-gnulas-s20e10/
Click to expand...

I saw that show, as well as a couple others to get a feel for what they're about. Never again. It's a terrible show, and they're terrible interviewers. RMS is a Buddha, and a guidepost to the enlightened path. Those 2 clowns would be lucky to accomplish in 20 lifetimes what RMS has accomplished in this one.
 
I thought it was very fair show. All his views didn't seem so insane till the end when he started saying:

If you make a living as paid programmer to support your kids
then you need to get another job

The thing to do is - do not have kids in the first place.

If you are making "non-free" software - it is unethical
basically it's the same as being an Enron executive ripping off shareholders.

and then look at the distros which he is against
http://www.gnu.org/distros/common-distros.html
 
Last edited:
vtx1300 said:
I thought it was very fair show. All his views didn't seem so insane till the end when he started saying:

If you make a living as paid programmer to support your kids
then you need to get another job

The thing to do is - do not have kids in the first place.

If you are making "non-free" software - it is unethical
basically it's the same as being an Enron executive ripping off shareholders.
Click to expand...

Those are no surprises. He's held those positions his whole life. Proprietary software is bad, period. To RMS there is no way to make an honest living, and live an ethical life by making proprietary software. There aren't any degrees, where some level of proprietary software is ok.

In general, I think he's right. I don't follow as stringent a path, but I consider that more a failing on my part than of his.

Edit:
With the distros, it's because they allow non-free software. Again, it's more stringent than my views, but it makes sense, even on a practical level. By saying "fsck it, Flash works ok, and it doesn't hurt much" it leads to apathy, and complacency where people start accepting more and more proprietary software as ok. You see that with 100% proprietary software users as shown in this thread. 15 years ago no one would have accepted the egregious DRM, and remote kill switches many seem to accept today. If you let your rights go a little bit at a time, one day you find you have no rights at all.
 
Last edited:
I just don't want programmers even flipping my burgers - but I do have faith they will make some good s/w - and if they need to feed their kids along the way - I don't diss them for it
 
vtx1300 said:
I just don't want programmers even flipping my burgers - but I do have faith they will make some good s/w - and if they need to feed their kids along the way - I don't diss them for it
Click to expand...

I don't have a problem with them getting paid, but they can do that with free software too. Like lxskllr, I'm not as outwardly extreme about it as RMS. But I'm always going to choose free software for myself whenever possible because I don't want to get locked into some corporation's proprietary data formats and the like.
 
In my opinion, it is better to have kill switch but let end user make a call whether to delete the app or not. Like most of the phone and tablet users, being not-so-technical, would not even know if any malicious app is pilfering their personal info. Let user have control over the final action like spell checker, let me know and I will decide what to do the next.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top